pappu
06-07 12:24 PM
Experts on this subject should send an email to logiclife with ther full contact info and IV ID so that they can be available on call to solve any tech issues of the site. Thanks
wallpaper friends quotes wallpaper.
immigal
01-28 04:05 PM
The hourly rate gets multiplied by the number of normal working hours per year company.
As per onenet, it comes up as
hourly rate * 260 days*(Hours per day which is usually 8 hours.Or some companies have 7.75 working hours per day).
Also onenet mentions the annual wage next to the hourly rate by using above formula of hourly rate*260*8.
Also as per my lawyer, bonus is not part of the wages.
Hi! Guys
I'm in a similar position i have been offered a new position (similar to current job) with another employer with salary like 97k plus bonus comes to 100k ,it is more then my current salary a but less then LCA Specified rate of $50.88/HR.
If the LCA $ 50.88/HR how do they calculate the annual salary ??
Will it be $50.88 /HR*160 Hours (per month )* 12 months = $97689,if it is calculated this way then i should be fine ,i think so.
I would appreciate if any you of guy's can give some valuable advice ??
Thanks
GCNJ
As per onenet, it comes up as
hourly rate * 260 days*(Hours per day which is usually 8 hours.Or some companies have 7.75 working hours per day).
Also onenet mentions the annual wage next to the hourly rate by using above formula of hourly rate*260*8.
Also as per my lawyer, bonus is not part of the wages.
Hi! Guys
I'm in a similar position i have been offered a new position (similar to current job) with another employer with salary like 97k plus bonus comes to 100k ,it is more then my current salary a but less then LCA Specified rate of $50.88/HR.
If the LCA $ 50.88/HR how do they calculate the annual salary ??
Will it be $50.88 /HR*160 Hours (per month )* 12 months = $97689,if it is calculated this way then i should be fine ,i think so.
I would appreciate if any you of guy's can give some valuable advice ??
Thanks
GCNJ
pappu
06-07 12:24 PM
Experts on this subject should send an email to logiclife with ther full contact info and IV ID so that they can be available on call to solve any tech issues of the site. Thanks
2011 friends quotes wallpaper. cute
ivar
08-29 10:06 PM
Hi,
I am in a messy situation and need advices. My h1 extension was denied on Aug 27 , 2009 and my I94 expired on Aug 16, 2009. I would appreciate if someone can tell me the options that I have right now. Am I in out of status and should I stop working immediately. It will be a week before I get the letter from USCIS. I just got it in the email as I had registered at their site.
I also wanted to know if I can transfer my H1 now even though the I94 is expired.
any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Sorry to hear about your case. I think there were some threads earlier about H1 extension denials. I don't remember exactly and i am not an expert but i think you can appeal and there are certain number of days you can work till you get the decision.. but don't take my word just dig in more into earlier threads. Let us know the reason behind your denial after you receive your letter from USCIS.
I am in a messy situation and need advices. My h1 extension was denied on Aug 27 , 2009 and my I94 expired on Aug 16, 2009. I would appreciate if someone can tell me the options that I have right now. Am I in out of status and should I stop working immediately. It will be a week before I get the letter from USCIS. I just got it in the email as I had registered at their site.
I also wanted to know if I can transfer my H1 now even though the I94 is expired.
any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Sorry to hear about your case. I think there were some threads earlier about H1 extension denials. I don't remember exactly and i am not an expert but i think you can appeal and there are certain number of days you can work till you get the decision.. but don't take my word just dig in more into earlier threads. Let us know the reason behind your denial after you receive your letter from USCIS.
more...
Macaca
10-17 10:07 AM
U.S. Tech Workers Fight Back (http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/oct2007/db20071015_302399.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index _companies) The Programmers Guild is issuing a rebuttal following calls for unlimited green cards for some foreign workers. Can Congress reach a compromise? By Moira Herbst | Business Week, October 15, 2007
The Guild's main issues with the proposal: It would not require employers to try to hire Americans first, and it could swamp the market with tens of thousands of additional workers, because it would require only foreign workers to hold bachelors' degrees to compete with Americans.
How can BS foriegn worker competing with Americans lead to not hiring American FIRST?
The Guild's main issues with the proposal: It would not require employers to try to hire Americans first, and it could swamp the market with tens of thousands of additional workers, because it would require only foreign workers to hold bachelors' degrees to compete with Americans.
How can BS foriegn worker competing with Americans lead to not hiring American FIRST?
indio0617
08-19 09:11 PM
Strategically, where do you think the next one should be ?
more...
gcformeornot
05-29 04:24 PM
Urgent Notice of Intent to Deny I-485, LCA amendment not filed - Topic Powered by Infopop (http://murthyforum.atinfopop.com/4/OpenTopic?a=tpc&s=1024039761&f=1474093861&m=8951088502&r=1511058602#1511058602)
Murthy Law Firm Attorney 6
Attorney posted May 29, 2010 12:34 PM
Call the Murthy Law Firm after the holiday weekend and get some help.
We have started to see this issue. The USCIS trying to deny I-485s due to LCA failures. The reason the LCAs aren't proper, usually, is that the employer relocated the person w/o doing a new LCA. The employee usually has no idea, since the LCA is the employer's filing and there used to be a lot less attention/awareness about LCA issues.
We have developed a number of arguments regarding this matter....including the "no fault of your own" concept and arguments regarding status violations vs LCA violations etc. This is a new development.
The reason why it is important is that it is necessary to be in status when filing the I-485. Prior status violations exceeding 180 days prior to or after filing the I-485 are grounds for I-485 denials.
It is a complicated topic. If the USCIS persists in this matter, there are going to be a lot of cases with this type of problem.
Murthy Law Firm Attorney 6
Attorney posted May 29, 2010 12:34 PM
Call the Murthy Law Firm after the holiday weekend and get some help.
We have started to see this issue. The USCIS trying to deny I-485s due to LCA failures. The reason the LCAs aren't proper, usually, is that the employer relocated the person w/o doing a new LCA. The employee usually has no idea, since the LCA is the employer's filing and there used to be a lot less attention/awareness about LCA issues.
We have developed a number of arguments regarding this matter....including the "no fault of your own" concept and arguments regarding status violations vs LCA violations etc. This is a new development.
The reason why it is important is that it is necessary to be in status when filing the I-485. Prior status violations exceeding 180 days prior to or after filing the I-485 are grounds for I-485 denials.
It is a complicated topic. If the USCIS persists in this matter, there are going to be a lot of cases with this type of problem.
2010 love quotes wallpapers.
jcrajput
10-01 03:37 PM
What PD has to do with EAD renewal?
more...
chaanakya
02-22 11:21 PM
Hi there
This situation is not that complex. Here are the basics:
1. Your wife is currently present in the US legally, her status is AOS pending with you as the principal applicant.
2. Your wife's H1b status is no longer valid, since she has no paystubs, the employer-employee relationship never existed. Her employer can withdraw her petition. It is somewhat hard to believe that the employer filed for H1b without getting a contract signed first. But either way, if you say you knew nothing about this, an email trail or something might lead back to you. Not advisable to sour the relationship there.
3. If you want your wife to be on H4, she can get a visa from India anytime since your H1b is perfectly valid. That is one of the simpler ways to get her on H4. You can also apply for a change in status to H4 within the US.
Hope that clears up any confusion :)
This situation is not that complex. Here are the basics:
1. Your wife is currently present in the US legally, her status is AOS pending with you as the principal applicant.
2. Your wife's H1b status is no longer valid, since she has no paystubs, the employer-employee relationship never existed. Her employer can withdraw her petition. It is somewhat hard to believe that the employer filed for H1b without getting a contract signed first. But either way, if you say you knew nothing about this, an email trail or something might lead back to you. Not advisable to sour the relationship there.
3. If you want your wife to be on H4, she can get a visa from India anytime since your H1b is perfectly valid. That is one of the simpler ways to get her on H4. You can also apply for a change in status to H4 within the US.
Hope that clears up any confusion :)
hair cute friendship quotes
unseenguy
05-16 02:57 PM
Compare the future:
New leadership of India:
Dr. Manmohan Singh (PhD economics Cambridge, UK), architect of current Indian economy.
Palniappan Chidambaram (MBA Harvard), finance minister in earstwhile congress govt.
Pranab Mukherjee - Long time service in Indian foreign affairs.
Upcoming leaders:
Sachin Pilot
Milind Deora
Rahul Gandhi
Arun Jaitley
Narendra Modi
New leadership in US:
Barack Obama - No prior govt experience. Harvard educated lawyer.
Joe Biden - Didn't bother to read education, long time service in US senate.
Dick Durbin - Lawyer from somewhere. Americas one of the finest senators.
Chuck Grassley - Farmer from Iowa. Always on the wrong side of a legislation that does not involve farming.
The only leader stands out to me in the new dispensation is Hillary Clinton.
US's upcoming leaders:
Bobby Jindal
Sarah Palin
Tim Pawlenty
Barack Obama
Anyways democratic party is now full of old hags.
Personalities are for yourself to compare.
New leadership of India:
Dr. Manmohan Singh (PhD economics Cambridge, UK), architect of current Indian economy.
Palniappan Chidambaram (MBA Harvard), finance minister in earstwhile congress govt.
Pranab Mukherjee - Long time service in Indian foreign affairs.
Upcoming leaders:
Sachin Pilot
Milind Deora
Rahul Gandhi
Arun Jaitley
Narendra Modi
New leadership in US:
Barack Obama - No prior govt experience. Harvard educated lawyer.
Joe Biden - Didn't bother to read education, long time service in US senate.
Dick Durbin - Lawyer from somewhere. Americas one of the finest senators.
Chuck Grassley - Farmer from Iowa. Always on the wrong side of a legislation that does not involve farming.
The only leader stands out to me in the new dispensation is Hillary Clinton.
US's upcoming leaders:
Bobby Jindal
Sarah Palin
Tim Pawlenty
Barack Obama
Anyways democratic party is now full of old hags.
Personalities are for yourself to compare.
more...
BEC_fog
03-05 03:26 PM
I was exactly in the same situation as you. I got my I-140 approval in May 2007 and applied for H1B three year extension in June 2007. The dates became current in July 2007 and I got our H1B/H4 approval for 1 Year. As per Yates memo, I should have got 3 year extension with I-140 approval and dates not being current when I applied for H1B extension(June2007). I forced my company Attorney to contact USCIS CSC to ammend the approval of our H1B/H4 for three years. Though it took more than 6 months, but I got my H1B ammended approval for 3 years :) in Feb 2008. My I-485 is pending when they ammended my approval to 3 years. So, If you have I-140 approved and dates are not current when you applied for H1B/H4 extension, one should get 3 year approval and not 1 year, even if I-485 is pending.
canleo98 is correct...the date that is used to consider if your priority date is current or not for your 3 year extension is the date when you filed for your H-1B extension and not the date when the USCIS is approving your H-1B. I had specifically asked my attorney this question and he affirmed that.
canleo98 is correct...the date that is used to consider if your priority date is current or not for your 3 year extension is the date when you filed for your H-1B extension and not the date when the USCIS is approving your H-1B. I had specifically asked my attorney this question and he affirmed that.
hot friends quotes wallpaper.
chanduv23
11-06 10:30 AM
If they are forcing onto you, as per me, you can give the AC21 Paper and G-28. After a couple of months sent a new G-28 from the old/current lawyer with whom you want to go. They will not know about it. This is just my opinion but may be wron as well.
just say no - don't get into this at all. Company wont fire you for this.
just say no - don't get into this at all. Company wont fire you for this.
more...
house friendship quotes wallpapers.
TheOmbudsman
06-14 10:36 AM
Provisions which included increase in visa numbers for EB immigrants existed prior to the creation of IV. That was true for multiple bills. Lobbying for tHat was never a big accomplishment. It is more like a wrong strategy, just a waste of time and resources.
We need to lobby by striking a bill that deals with less controversial issues, such as a moderate increase of H1B and a relief to the veterans in the greencard process only. That would be way more acceptable by the public opinion.
Being part of CIR will give us 1% of chances to see this passing. Also, if pro CIR senators get replaced coming next elections - strong evidences so far indicate that is the case - than CIR would be less likely to pass.
We need to lobby in favor of SKIL bill and against the passage of CIR.
The job market is good so why not we look for a new job, get a better postion, negotiate a deal with them to start GC in 6 months after starting.
The pros are: career growth, better pay, avoiding agony of this retrogression
The cons are: PD will be in 2006-2007
Hopefully they'll deal with this retrogression problem in the next year or so. Looks like the CIR timing is really bad and reps want to use it as a political issue against dems.
It's understandable for people with PD's in 2002-2003 (EB2) and 2002 (EB3) but for others, it is incomprehensible that they are waiting for this thing to become current. I personally dont think that it is worth waiting at the expense of one's career.
It's unfortunate that they combined the retrogression problem with illegal immigration. May be we should have just lobbied for addressing retrogression rather than asking for a number of other provisions like spouse, visa numbers, etc.
I respect the effort being put in by IV folks and am not suggesting that they could have taken a different lobbying approach but I hope that they are already thinking of alternatives for this CIR thing.
I know that I am weighing in my alternatives and hopefully everyone who is affected by this retrogression are thinking of their alternatives.
Peace out!
We need to lobby by striking a bill that deals with less controversial issues, such as a moderate increase of H1B and a relief to the veterans in the greencard process only. That would be way more acceptable by the public opinion.
Being part of CIR will give us 1% of chances to see this passing. Also, if pro CIR senators get replaced coming next elections - strong evidences so far indicate that is the case - than CIR would be less likely to pass.
We need to lobby in favor of SKIL bill and against the passage of CIR.
The job market is good so why not we look for a new job, get a better postion, negotiate a deal with them to start GC in 6 months after starting.
The pros are: career growth, better pay, avoiding agony of this retrogression
The cons are: PD will be in 2006-2007
Hopefully they'll deal with this retrogression problem in the next year or so. Looks like the CIR timing is really bad and reps want to use it as a political issue against dems.
It's understandable for people with PD's in 2002-2003 (EB2) and 2002 (EB3) but for others, it is incomprehensible that they are waiting for this thing to become current. I personally dont think that it is worth waiting at the expense of one's career.
It's unfortunate that they combined the retrogression problem with illegal immigration. May be we should have just lobbied for addressing retrogression rather than asking for a number of other provisions like spouse, visa numbers, etc.
I respect the effort being put in by IV folks and am not suggesting that they could have taken a different lobbying approach but I hope that they are already thinking of alternatives for this CIR thing.
I know that I am weighing in my alternatives and hopefully everyone who is affected by this retrogression are thinking of their alternatives.
Peace out!
tattoo Friends+quotes+wallpapers
gcnirvana
02-16 01:10 PM
Sue did mention Bill Gates was over in Capitol Hill talking about H1B increase. I have it recorded in my DVR ;)
The above is the complete story except that I did not hear Bill Gates. I heard that companies were pushing for H1B a short while ago.
The above is the complete story except that I did not hear Bill Gates. I heard that companies were pushing for H1B a short while ago.
more...
pictures hair funny friend quote. funny
vivache
02-21 04:49 PM
I agree.
The other issue is that my labor got through ..so the lawyer is filing the 1 140 this week and that will give me 3 year extension and enable me to switch jobs if needed or even travel for 3 yrs without getting the visa stamped every year ..
This is why the h1/h4 will be filed once the 1 140 gets approved.
This whole visa/gC thing has so many constraints and factors .. it's a nightmare for an individual but a goldmine for the lawyers.
My company lawyers are so slow .. We shod start a separate thread on bad lawyers .. at least to get the cathartic good feel :)
The other issue is that my labor got through ..so the lawyer is filing the 1 140 this week and that will give me 3 year extension and enable me to switch jobs if needed or even travel for 3 yrs without getting the visa stamped every year ..
This is why the h1/h4 will be filed once the 1 140 gets approved.
This whole visa/gC thing has so many constraints and factors .. it's a nightmare for an individual but a goldmine for the lawyers.
My company lawyers are so slow .. We shod start a separate thread on bad lawyers .. at least to get the cathartic good feel :)
dresses below to your friends#39;
gondalguru
07-19 10:56 PM
Folks,
I have applied for my I-140 and I -485 Concurrently as my PD became current in July. I had very less time to file for I- 140 in PP as i have got my my LC only in June 3 rd week. so i filed both of them concurrently.
Now that USCIS is accepting I -485s again , and at the same time there is no PP for I -140 i am not sure whether i will be able to use AC 21 portability after 6 months OR not.
Fellow members please let me know what are the chances of getting the I-140 PP back in August.
Thanks to IV .
Yes you can still use AC21 portability act. It is easier and safer if your I-140 is approved but in the case of concurrent filing USCIS will look at pending I-140 and see if it was approvable at the time it was filed. Now this decision will depend on discretion of the officer adjudicating your case so situation might get little tricky here. If you filed using immigration attorney that he will be able to handle this situation with out much trouble.
I have applied for my I-140 and I -485 Concurrently as my PD became current in July. I had very less time to file for I- 140 in PP as i have got my my LC only in June 3 rd week. so i filed both of them concurrently.
Now that USCIS is accepting I -485s again , and at the same time there is no PP for I -140 i am not sure whether i will be able to use AC 21 portability after 6 months OR not.
Fellow members please let me know what are the chances of getting the I-140 PP back in August.
Thanks to IV .
Yes you can still use AC21 portability act. It is easier and safer if your I-140 is approved but in the case of concurrent filing USCIS will look at pending I-140 and see if it was approvable at the time it was filed. Now this decision will depend on discretion of the officer adjudicating your case so situation might get little tricky here. If you filed using immigration attorney that he will be able to handle this situation with out much trouble.
more...
makeup 2011 friends quotes wallpaper.
logiclife
12-03 08:49 PM
Anything related to information security also goes through lengthy security background checks at consulates when you do visa revalidation, because of it being on TAL.
Just because you do "information security" does not mean that you cannot find a job in the regular sector. Lots of companies need some form of security in their software/applications.
Why don't you relax a bit and then scout outside the government sector? They do not have US citizenship requirements. Maybe it may be worthwhile to change your job profile to be an "information systems engineer/professional" and bank on ur software skills (java,c++,c, oracle etc).
He is right.
One of the main reasons why H1B workers are so competitive is that they are willing and capable to quickly learn new programming/technical skills and are willing to relocate ANYWHERE in the country within a matter of days.
Also, the job market has improved tremendously in last 2 years and you should not find any problem in getting another job that may have a different technology/skill required. You dont have to stick to the same job description when transferring from one H1 to another. That is only neccesary when you are thru your GC process.
Just because you do "information security" does not mean that you cannot find a job in the regular sector. Lots of companies need some form of security in their software/applications.
Why don't you relax a bit and then scout outside the government sector? They do not have US citizenship requirements. Maybe it may be worthwhile to change your job profile to be an "information systems engineer/professional" and bank on ur software skills (java,c++,c, oracle etc).
He is right.
One of the main reasons why H1B workers are so competitive is that they are willing and capable to quickly learn new programming/technical skills and are willing to relocate ANYWHERE in the country within a matter of days.
Also, the job market has improved tremendously in last 2 years and you should not find any problem in getting another job that may have a different technology/skill required. You dont have to stick to the same job description when transferring from one H1 to another. That is only neccesary when you are thru your GC process.
girlfriend Posted in Best Friend Quotes
oomshiva
06-27 09:07 AM
Hi ,
I want to know what kind of jobs can a person on H4 status take after getting an EAD, any jobs like in wmart,etc or a good bank job or any high class reputed job, i am asking this as do the uscis see what kind of jobs the dependent on H4 visa did after getting their ead before adjusting their or before giving Greencard.
just wanted to know the options one has after getting an EAD.
thanks in advance for the reply.
oom
I want to know what kind of jobs can a person on H4 status take after getting an EAD, any jobs like in wmart,etc or a good bank job or any high class reputed job, i am asking this as do the uscis see what kind of jobs the dependent on H4 visa did after getting their ead before adjusting their or before giving Greencard.
just wanted to know the options one has after getting an EAD.
thanks in advance for the reply.
oom
hairstyles hairstyles friendship quotes
vallabhu
07-31 06:16 PM
Man this is good news for you and me also.I am also same or similar situation like you.
My original I-140 and 485 denied due to 3 year degree issue.after that we applied eb3 labor from same employer and got approved and we filed new EB3 I-140 in texas center.
We posted the docs on 05/26/2009 it will reach by 06/01/2009 and lets see what will happen after my second I-140 approval.
Guys please help us..if any body in this situation please share your thoughts...
it will help us to get back out 485 status.
thanks
Ganapati.
Hi Ganapati, I am in same situation as yours, do you have any update on your case, I just got my second I140 approved
My original I-140 and 485 denied due to 3 year degree issue.after that we applied eb3 labor from same employer and got approved and we filed new EB3 I-140 in texas center.
We posted the docs on 05/26/2009 it will reach by 06/01/2009 and lets see what will happen after my second I-140 approval.
Guys please help us..if any body in this situation please share your thoughts...
it will help us to get back out 485 status.
thanks
Ganapati.
Hi Ganapati, I am in same situation as yours, do you have any update on your case, I just got my second I140 approved
diqingshen
07-05 06:50 PM
the files yet. So maybe they are instructed by their lawyers not to in case the judge rules against them.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
zigma
02-06 09:45 AM
For the year 2006, H1's
Contribution to Social Security: $5B
Payment in taxes: $6B
Contribution to the economy: $18B
Being Free in the land of the Free: Priceless
For everything else, there is GreenCard
Contribution to Social Security: $5B
Payment in taxes: $6B
Contribution to the economy: $18B
Being Free in the land of the Free: Priceless
For everything else, there is GreenCard
No comments:
Post a Comment