BimmerFAn
10-07 01:42 PM
No.. the probationary period is granted for you to either complete 2 years of college or serve 2 years in the armed forces. Since I already completed my college degree there would be no probationary period. The implementation measures for this bill would have to be worked out 180 days after passage according to the text in the bill itself.
You are right that the current immigration laws are unfair to international students. But, EB-2 is completely clear for ROW.. the only backlog is India and China.. and frankly thats just government regulation interfering with market conditions. The fact is, there are simply too many applicants from those two countries and the government has to step in to bring it back to normal distribution. There are a number of factors why India is so backlogged.. good and bad..
Let's hope for something to happen, because whatever it is, it will certainly be better than what we have now.
You are right that the current immigration laws are unfair to international students. But, EB-2 is completely clear for ROW.. the only backlog is India and China.. and frankly thats just government regulation interfering with market conditions. The fact is, there are simply too many applicants from those two countries and the government has to step in to bring it back to normal distribution. There are a number of factors why India is so backlogged.. good and bad..
Let's hope for something to happen, because whatever it is, it will certainly be better than what we have now.
wallpaper Jennifer Aniston Hairstyle
kavas
05-24 10:12 AM
Good effort but the text of your petition is not emphatic , it seems specific to the Advanced Degree holders facing retrogression and does not highlight the plight of millions of legal EB based GC seekers facing retrogression.
You may want to broaden the focus of your appeal.
You may want to broaden the focus of your appeal.
immig4me
11-12 09:38 AM
"No chance in hell" is how I would put it for any kind of pro-immigration reform in 2011 (CIR, piece meal or otherwise). Of course, the antis (Smith/King) in the house will pass an enforcement-only bill which will, of course, die in the senate.
Then, 2012 will dawn on us, God willing, and that will be an election year. Nobody will go near the word "immigration".
We have seen this movie over and over and over again.
Let's see what Harry does in the lameduck session in the Senate. He may do some grandstanding to prove it to the Latinos that he tried but, the GOP blocked it (since he promised that he would introduce immigration bill in the lameduck session). If by God's grace, it somehow passes the Senate, then, we may be home free (chances of that happening is as good as winning a lottery).
Not sure how we will be "home free" if the DREAM ACT passes? Did you mean to say, we are free to go back to India?
Then, 2012 will dawn on us, God willing, and that will be an election year. Nobody will go near the word "immigration".
We have seen this movie over and over and over again.
Let's see what Harry does in the lameduck session in the Senate. He may do some grandstanding to prove it to the Latinos that he tried but, the GOP blocked it (since he promised that he would introduce immigration bill in the lameduck session). If by God's grace, it somehow passes the Senate, then, we may be home free (chances of that happening is as good as winning a lottery).
Not sure how we will be "home free" if the DREAM ACT passes? Did you mean to say, we are free to go back to India?
2011 Jennifer Aniston in 81st
rameshvaid
10-25 12:55 PM
Thanks RameshVaid. I have just arrived from India after about 8 months delay. I lost close to $50K in this mess and yes the apartment guys here did not leave me without extracting their pound of flesh. I was barely able to save my job (visa approval came in the last week of my allowed leave of absence). I finally got a new rental apartment and moved some of my belongings that my friends saved yesterday. I sincerely believe that we need to highlight our plight to the authorities concerned and I hope to draft a letter as soon as I can get my life back together.
Thanks again for your offer of help.
Thank GOD and am sure you must be releived now and there is nothing to feel happy to come out of this mess. I agree with you to write to the authorities but none is going to listen to our plight but no harm in letting them know what we are and have gone through.
Good Luck..
RV
Thanks again for your offer of help.
Thank GOD and am sure you must be releived now and there is nothing to feel happy to come out of this mess. I agree with you to write to the authorities but none is going to listen to our plight but no harm in letting them know what we are and have gone through.
Good Luck..
RV
more...
mchundi
07-18 03:50 PM
My husband is in his 6th year of H1-B. He has an approved PERM Labor
application ( pending I-140, EB-2, He has a Masters degree from the US in
computer engg). I am on a H1-b & have been on H status for little less than 4 years. I too have an approved PERM Labor application & an approved I-140, EB2, waiting to file for I485 due to retrogression. I had a couple of questions & would appreciate if you could
answer these for me :
1) Should he decide to quit his job & plan to study full time, would he have to
go on F-1 status or is he eligible to be on H-4 status based on my H1-B
status (even though he would have completed 6 years in H1B status by then & would be in 7th year of H-1B status based on extension received by virtue of approved PERM Labor/I-140, but I would still be in my 4th-5th year of H status with an approved PERM Labor/I-140, EB2) ?
1: He is not elgible for H4 status beyond 6 years based on ur H1, while u r under the 6 year limit.
U shud take a legal advice on the H1 to F1 part. I dont know how advisible (F1)this is. H is a dual intent VISA while F is not.
2) In another scenario, assuming my husband gets a 3 year H1-B extension (beyond the sixth year, based on approved PERM Labor/I-140), would another employer be able to file for H1-B on his behalf if he finds a job with another employer & decide to quit his present job ? If so his Green Card Processing would need to be re-started & then would he be able to retain his Priority Date. Also if his current employer chooses not to give his Labor approval/I-140 approval documents, will he still be able to change jobs & get H1-B filed from another employer.
2: He can get 3 year H1-B based on the approved labor and (after approval of I140) as long as PD is not current and his current G.C is in Process with the same or different employer.
--MC
application ( pending I-140, EB-2, He has a Masters degree from the US in
computer engg). I am on a H1-b & have been on H status for little less than 4 years. I too have an approved PERM Labor application & an approved I-140, EB2, waiting to file for I485 due to retrogression. I had a couple of questions & would appreciate if you could
answer these for me :
1) Should he decide to quit his job & plan to study full time, would he have to
go on F-1 status or is he eligible to be on H-4 status based on my H1-B
status (even though he would have completed 6 years in H1B status by then & would be in 7th year of H-1B status based on extension received by virtue of approved PERM Labor/I-140, but I would still be in my 4th-5th year of H status with an approved PERM Labor/I-140, EB2) ?
1: He is not elgible for H4 status beyond 6 years based on ur H1, while u r under the 6 year limit.
U shud take a legal advice on the H1 to F1 part. I dont know how advisible (F1)this is. H is a dual intent VISA while F is not.
2) In another scenario, assuming my husband gets a 3 year H1-B extension (beyond the sixth year, based on approved PERM Labor/I-140), would another employer be able to file for H1-B on his behalf if he finds a job with another employer & decide to quit his present job ? If so his Green Card Processing would need to be re-started & then would he be able to retain his Priority Date. Also if his current employer chooses not to give his Labor approval/I-140 approval documents, will he still be able to change jobs & get H1-B filed from another employer.
2: He can get 3 year H1-B based on the approved labor and (after approval of I140) as long as PD is not current and his current G.C is in Process with the same or different employer.
--MC
GCKaMaara
11-17 10:47 AM
Bump ^^^^
more...
astral1977
01-08 03:49 PM
AC21 comes into picture only if you have filed for I-485. And AC21 is for switching jobs to same or similar job.
Priority dates can be retained with I-140 approval also. And of course, no matter what is said on forums it is always better that folks consult with their attorney. And they would be willing to help.
Priority dates can be retained with I-140 approval also. And of course, no matter what is said on forums it is always better that folks consult with their attorney. And they would be willing to help.
2010 Jennifer Aniston and her
kumar1
11-30 04:01 PM
I have "one more last question (desi style)" -- Do you need AP to drive on US freeways?
My wife is in India and I am here in the US. I got an offer from Company A offering me 1 dollar per hour more and I would like to give that job to my wife who is in India doing Masters in home science but she can be a SAP functional consultant. Her mom makes very good chicken Biryani so I can "arrange" her H-1B and once she is here she can change her status to B-1 and she would start doing QA job......Menwhile, I would get my Passport/AP/EAD/PIO/Library Card/Credit Card/Visa/Master Card/Birth Certificate renewed.
Sorry, I can not go to bed unless I spend 1 hour each night on Murthy.com. MurthiJi is my hero. Should I go with Rajiv Khanna? Wait a minute, this weekend, I am invited to a desi party, I need to discuss this with my friends. It is 10 PM, I need to go to work to Xerox all my immigration papers, FedEx is damn expensive!
Wait....I got an email from Company B, they are ready to do my mother in law's F-1 visa. One more last question -- When she lands, can I go to SFO airport to pick her up, I am on AP and I am stressed.
I have one more last question...............Please reply....it is urgent.
Hello Hello.....I loved your post.....
yesterday I returned safely from work, no accident. I drove at about 60 miles per hr. on highways and about 20 MPH in the town. But overall a good driving experience, no hassles. I carried my driver's license, I saw few police patrols on the way, but they didn't stop me and didn't ask me for my license. Very cool...everybody can drive now.
My wife is in India and I am here in the US. I got an offer from Company A offering me 1 dollar per hour more and I would like to give that job to my wife who is in India doing Masters in home science but she can be a SAP functional consultant. Her mom makes very good chicken Biryani so I can "arrange" her H-1B and once she is here she can change her status to B-1 and she would start doing QA job......Menwhile, I would get my Passport/AP/EAD/PIO/Library Card/Credit Card/Visa/Master Card/Birth Certificate renewed.
Sorry, I can not go to bed unless I spend 1 hour each night on Murthy.com. MurthiJi is my hero. Should I go with Rajiv Khanna? Wait a minute, this weekend, I am invited to a desi party, I need to discuss this with my friends. It is 10 PM, I need to go to work to Xerox all my immigration papers, FedEx is damn expensive!
Wait....I got an email from Company B, they are ready to do my mother in law's F-1 visa. One more last question -- When she lands, can I go to SFO airport to pick her up, I am on AP and I am stressed.
I have one more last question...............Please reply....it is urgent.
Hello Hello.....I loved your post.....
yesterday I returned safely from work, no accident. I drove at about 60 miles per hr. on highways and about 20 MPH in the town. But overall a good driving experience, no hassles. I carried my driver's license, I saw few police patrols on the way, but they didn't stop me and didn't ask me for my license. Very cool...everybody can drive now.
more...
GCcomesoon
11-15 10:19 AM
Hi
I would suggest we all members from MI, gather together in Detroit downtown & do silent march with banners & our messages. Just like what we did in DC
Thanks
GCcomesoon
I would suggest we all members from MI, gather together in Detroit downtown & do silent march with banners & our messages. Just like what we did in DC
Thanks
GCcomesoon
hair Hairstyle+jennifer+aniston
urwelcome
10-28 08:16 AM
Vxg,
How did you directly contacted TSC directly? I have been calling to National service center # and they just opened a SR for me.
Thanks
How did you directly contacted TSC directly? I have been calling to National service center # and they just opened a SR for me.
Thanks
more...
sweet_jungle
12-23 10:25 PM
Is the PD correct on your approval notice, July 2003?
Thought I will post an update on my case. I got my approval notice yesterday but my wife's application has not yet been approved. So I called the USCIS to try and find out what was happening and on my first attempt they said the application was sent to TSC for adjudication and they, NSC, had no further info. The person that I spoke to asked me to call again and pretend as if I had no receipt number and she said that way I will be able to speak to someone who will be able to direct my call and raise a service request.
That didn't go very far. The lady that I spoke to kept driving me around in circle and finally told me that there was no way they could help me. She kept insisting that I write directly to TSC and find out what was going on.
Frustrated I hung up and decided to call again and this I punched in the receipt #. Luckily I got hold of someone who was a more understanding and helpful. She sounded Latino (no racial judgment here, only glad that I got a chance to speak with someone who understood the pain). She was surprised that my wife application had been sent to TSC and not adjudicated at NSC. She said she was going request for both our files and ones she got that she was going to present that to the IO who approved my case and ask the officer why my wife�s wasn't adjudicated. She said at times it so happens that files get separated. She took down my phone number and said that she would get back to me in a weeks time.
Keeping my fingers crossed and hope that my wife's case is also approved soon.
Thought I will post an update on my case. I got my approval notice yesterday but my wife's application has not yet been approved. So I called the USCIS to try and find out what was happening and on my first attempt they said the application was sent to TSC for adjudication and they, NSC, had no further info. The person that I spoke to asked me to call again and pretend as if I had no receipt number and she said that way I will be able to speak to someone who will be able to direct my call and raise a service request.
That didn't go very far. The lady that I spoke to kept driving me around in circle and finally told me that there was no way they could help me. She kept insisting that I write directly to TSC and find out what was going on.
Frustrated I hung up and decided to call again and this I punched in the receipt #. Luckily I got hold of someone who was a more understanding and helpful. She sounded Latino (no racial judgment here, only glad that I got a chance to speak with someone who understood the pain). She was surprised that my wife application had been sent to TSC and not adjudicated at NSC. She said she was going request for both our files and ones she got that she was going to present that to the IO who approved my case and ask the officer why my wife�s wasn't adjudicated. She said at times it so happens that files get separated. She took down my phone number and said that she would get back to me in a weeks time.
Keeping my fingers crossed and hope that my wife's case is also approved soon.
hot New Long Hairstyles 2011:
soma
01-14 11:18 AM
I just saw an old article in immigration.com.......this is something which happened in 2002...can't it be repeated for this year? From what I've understood they did recapture the unused family visa numbers of the previous fiscal year and used the numbers for EB
the link is as follows.....
http://www.immigration.com/newsletter1/dosvisavail.html
the article is as follows..............
Projected Employment-Based Visa Availability - DOS
A pool of approximately 130,000 additional Employment-based numbers was established by the provisions outlined in AC21. The department so far has used approximately 30,000 of those numbers, and the remaining 100,000 numbers can be used if/when the regular annual employment limit is reached. During FY-2002 there were approximately 25,000 unused Family numbers, and these numbers are added to the FY-2003 Employment limit. This means that for FY-2003 the Employment limit will be approximately 165,000, plus any numbers required from the remaining AC21 pool.
Based on visa number use during the past two years the department expects the Employment-based categories to remain "Current" (with the possible exception of the Other Workers category) through at least the end of FY-2004. Changes in demand from the immigration and Naturalization Service could impact this estimate and require the AC21 "pool" to be used up earlier, resulting in some Employment categories becoming oversubscribed.
VARIOUS DETERMINATIONS OF NUMERICAL LIMITS ON IMMIGRANTS REQUIRED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT
DETERMINATION OF FAMILY PREFERENCE NUMERICAL LIMIT FOR FY-2002
Terms of the Immigration and Nationality Act:
INA 201(c) specifies that the worldwide level of family-sponsored preference immigrants for a fiscal year is equal to:
480,000,
minus the number of immigrants described in subparagraphs (A) and B) of INA 201(b)(2) who, in the previous fiscal year, were issued immigrant visas or who otherwise acquired lawful permanent resident status*,
minus the number of aliens described in subparagraph INA 201(c)(4),plus employment preference immigrant numbers which were unused during the previous fiscal year.
Under INA 201, however, the family-sponsored preference limitation for any fiscal year may not be less than 226,000.
Immediate Relative Immigrant Totals for FY-2001:
Immigrant visa workload reports received by the Department of State from consular posts worldwide show that during FY-2001 a total of 172,087 immediate relative (IR) visas were issued. This total is subject to a net reduction of 24, however, to take account of issued visas returned unused to consular offices and thus "recaptured" under INA 206.
Figures on adjustments of status at local offices of the Immigration and Naturalization Service compiled and provided by INS Headquarters indicate that a total of 273,981 immigrants were granted lawful permanent residence at INS offices in the United States during FY-2001 in the categories for spouses, children and parents of U.S. citizens;
this figure includes persons who acquired permanent residence after having been admitted in nonimmigrant "K" (fiance(e)) status. Another 6 children accompanying immediate relative parents were admitted under INA 211(a).
* The immigrants described in these subparagraphs are 1) immediate relatives, i.e., spouses, children and parents of U.S. citizens, 2) children admitted under INA 211(a) on the basis of prior issuance of an immigrant visa to their accompanying parent who is such immediate relative, and 3) children born to a lawful permanent resident during a temporary visit abroad.
INS admission figures record 929 children accorded permanent resident status after birth abroad to a permanent resident of the United States.
-2-
Employment Preference Number Use for FY-2001:
The employment-based preference limit for FY-2001 was 192,074. (Visa Bulletin No. 36, Vol. VIII, dated August 3, 2001 provided information on FY-2001 limitations.) A total of 186,536 of these numbers were used for FY-2001 visa issuances or INS adjustments of status and, as required by INA 203(b)(6), an additional 30 were applied to special immigrants who were issued visas or adjusted status during FY-2000 under INA 101(a)(27)(K) [certain U.S. armed forces personnel]. Another 2 were charged for children admitted under INA 211(a) accompanying parents with employment preference visas. There were also 5 employment preference visas returned unused to consular offices; the numbers assigned to these issuances were thus "recaptured" under INA 206.
Total unused numbers: 192,074 - (186,536 + 2) - 30 + 5 = 5,511.
Calculation of FY-2002 Family-Sponsored Preference Limitation:
Immediate relative visa issuances during FY-2001: 172,087
(minus net total of "recaptured" FY-2001 IR visas: - 24)
Immediate relative adjustments of status by INS: 273,981
Children admitted after birth to immediate relative visa holders: 6
Children admitted after birth abroad to lawful permanent residents: ___929
Immediate Relative etc. Total: 446,979
FY-2001 worldwide family-sponsored level figure: 480,000
minus IR etc. total calculated above: -446,979
minus aliens paroled into the United States under Section 212(d)(5) in the second preceding fiscal year(FY-2000): -
n/a*
plus unused FY-2001 employment pref. numbers: + _5,511
Total: 38,532
Since under the law the family-sponsored preference limitation for any fiscal year may not be less than 226,000, the limit for FY-2002 is fixed at:
226,000
the link is as follows.....
http://www.immigration.com/newsletter1/dosvisavail.html
the article is as follows..............
Projected Employment-Based Visa Availability - DOS
A pool of approximately 130,000 additional Employment-based numbers was established by the provisions outlined in AC21. The department so far has used approximately 30,000 of those numbers, and the remaining 100,000 numbers can be used if/when the regular annual employment limit is reached. During FY-2002 there were approximately 25,000 unused Family numbers, and these numbers are added to the FY-2003 Employment limit. This means that for FY-2003 the Employment limit will be approximately 165,000, plus any numbers required from the remaining AC21 pool.
Based on visa number use during the past two years the department expects the Employment-based categories to remain "Current" (with the possible exception of the Other Workers category) through at least the end of FY-2004. Changes in demand from the immigration and Naturalization Service could impact this estimate and require the AC21 "pool" to be used up earlier, resulting in some Employment categories becoming oversubscribed.
VARIOUS DETERMINATIONS OF NUMERICAL LIMITS ON IMMIGRANTS REQUIRED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT
DETERMINATION OF FAMILY PREFERENCE NUMERICAL LIMIT FOR FY-2002
Terms of the Immigration and Nationality Act:
INA 201(c) specifies that the worldwide level of family-sponsored preference immigrants for a fiscal year is equal to:
480,000,
minus the number of immigrants described in subparagraphs (A) and B) of INA 201(b)(2) who, in the previous fiscal year, were issued immigrant visas or who otherwise acquired lawful permanent resident status*,
minus the number of aliens described in subparagraph INA 201(c)(4),plus employment preference immigrant numbers which were unused during the previous fiscal year.
Under INA 201, however, the family-sponsored preference limitation for any fiscal year may not be less than 226,000.
Immediate Relative Immigrant Totals for FY-2001:
Immigrant visa workload reports received by the Department of State from consular posts worldwide show that during FY-2001 a total of 172,087 immediate relative (IR) visas were issued. This total is subject to a net reduction of 24, however, to take account of issued visas returned unused to consular offices and thus "recaptured" under INA 206.
Figures on adjustments of status at local offices of the Immigration and Naturalization Service compiled and provided by INS Headquarters indicate that a total of 273,981 immigrants were granted lawful permanent residence at INS offices in the United States during FY-2001 in the categories for spouses, children and parents of U.S. citizens;
this figure includes persons who acquired permanent residence after having been admitted in nonimmigrant "K" (fiance(e)) status. Another 6 children accompanying immediate relative parents were admitted under INA 211(a).
* The immigrants described in these subparagraphs are 1) immediate relatives, i.e., spouses, children and parents of U.S. citizens, 2) children admitted under INA 211(a) on the basis of prior issuance of an immigrant visa to their accompanying parent who is such immediate relative, and 3) children born to a lawful permanent resident during a temporary visit abroad.
INS admission figures record 929 children accorded permanent resident status after birth abroad to a permanent resident of the United States.
-2-
Employment Preference Number Use for FY-2001:
The employment-based preference limit for FY-2001 was 192,074. (Visa Bulletin No. 36, Vol. VIII, dated August 3, 2001 provided information on FY-2001 limitations.) A total of 186,536 of these numbers were used for FY-2001 visa issuances or INS adjustments of status and, as required by INA 203(b)(6), an additional 30 were applied to special immigrants who were issued visas or adjusted status during FY-2000 under INA 101(a)(27)(K) [certain U.S. armed forces personnel]. Another 2 were charged for children admitted under INA 211(a) accompanying parents with employment preference visas. There were also 5 employment preference visas returned unused to consular offices; the numbers assigned to these issuances were thus "recaptured" under INA 206.
Total unused numbers: 192,074 - (186,536 + 2) - 30 + 5 = 5,511.
Calculation of FY-2002 Family-Sponsored Preference Limitation:
Immediate relative visa issuances during FY-2001: 172,087
(minus net total of "recaptured" FY-2001 IR visas: - 24)
Immediate relative adjustments of status by INS: 273,981
Children admitted after birth to immediate relative visa holders: 6
Children admitted after birth abroad to lawful permanent residents: ___929
Immediate Relative etc. Total: 446,979
FY-2001 worldwide family-sponsored level figure: 480,000
minus IR etc. total calculated above: -446,979
minus aliens paroled into the United States under Section 212(d)(5) in the second preceding fiscal year(FY-2000): -
n/a*
plus unused FY-2001 employment pref. numbers: + _5,511
Total: 38,532
Since under the law the family-sponsored preference limitation for any fiscal year may not be less than 226,000, the limit for FY-2002 is fixed at:
226,000
more...
house Similar Hairstyles
harsh
03-22 12:46 PM
Another question for all you guys. I have over 3 years of experience and am currently close to completing my MS. So, once the MS is completed, possibly by end fall 2006, will I be eligible for STEM? or I would have to work for another 3 years after completion of MS to be eligible?
tattoo wedding hairstyles.
RadioactveChimp
04-08 02:19 AM
nice man! They look great! Oh man, I found this site a while back where you can upload images and get some companyto print out actual stamps and send them to you. WE should do that. As in "we" I mean the forum. lol
more...
pictures Jennifer Aniston Hairstyles
logiclife
01-19 01:01 PM
Youtube is a great tool to get our message across.
If any of you can think of creative ideas of producing 30 second videos that send a very very sharp message of how USA is squandering its innovative edge by ignoring the highly-skilled, and if its funny in any way, it would give Immigration Voice, the publicity that cannot be bought.
We will continue to put more videos on Youtube. Zazona and his friends can do whatever they want to do, we dont care.
If any of you can think of creative ideas of producing 30 second videos that send a very very sharp message of how USA is squandering its innovative edge by ignoring the highly-skilled, and if its funny in any way, it would give Immigration Voice, the publicity that cannot be bought.
We will continue to put more videos on Youtube. Zazona and his friends can do whatever they want to do, we dont care.
dresses wedding hairstyle updos
WeShallOvercome
08-06 06:22 PM
I thought USCIS recently clarified that one need not be in H1 status (or even in the country) to get a 7th year H1 extension based on a old LC or 485.
If thats the case, then why cant we go to EAD for a few months and say within a year come back to H1 (so we are not counted in the new quota, and get a 3year H1 extension because of approved I-140)?
If you are not counted in the new quota, you can switch back from EAD to H1.
What I meant was you can't just enter on AP and work on H1.
If thats the case, then why cant we go to EAD for a few months and say within a year come back to H1 (so we are not counted in the new quota, and get a 3year H1 extension because of approved I-140)?
If you are not counted in the new quota, you can switch back from EAD to H1.
What I meant was you can't just enter on AP and work on H1.
more...
makeup jennifer aniston wedding
checklaw
04-03 12:32 PM
Hi,
I applied for FOIA and i got the receipt, but all they will send me is a photocopy of my approved I-140.
I already have a photocopy i dont need another photocopy.
I need the original I-140 that is on a paper like original 797 with the watermark etc on a orange uscis paper.
Did you get a photocopy on a plain black and white paper (or) did you get something which looks like original ??
Please reply...
The I-140 is the employers petition for the foreign alien and hence belongs to the employer. I do not think you can get an original.
checklaw
I applied for FOIA and i got the receipt, but all they will send me is a photocopy of my approved I-140.
I already have a photocopy i dont need another photocopy.
I need the original I-140 that is on a paper like original 797 with the watermark etc on a orange uscis paper.
Did you get a photocopy on a plain black and white paper (or) did you get something which looks like original ??
Please reply...
The I-140 is the employers petition for the foreign alien and hence belongs to the employer. I do not think you can get an original.
checklaw
girlfriend jennifer aniston wedding
saikatmandal
11-15 11:15 AM
I think this is a great idea. We have to keep the limelight (read government, press, media etc) on our issue and cause.
I am fine with Christmas tree or another flower campaign or for that matter any other innovative idea.
GUESS IT IS TIME TO ACT
ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS !
Can we quickly think of an action plan and set this rolling... we have very few days between now and the holiday season (Dec 25)
Can one of our Administrators put a thread on the main page.
I am fine with Christmas tree or another flower campaign or for that matter any other innovative idea.
GUESS IT IS TIME TO ACT
ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS !
Can we quickly think of an action plan and set this rolling... we have very few days between now and the holiday season (Dec 25)
Can one of our Administrators put a thread on the main page.
hairstyles jennifer-anistons-chic-
Peacelover
11-05 03:31 PM
PeacLover,
Aslo don't worry about the threat your uncle gave of contacting embbasy...
Good luck...
tabletpc,
thanks for your suggession, I believe we have a good lawyer (he is a civil lawyer) and seems to be a person of integrity so I am hoping that side is take care of,
I am really worried about my uncle doing something crazy and thats why I need to get a good criminal lawyer who is also familiar with the NRI aspect of the law.
Anyways I will talk to my lawyer about the mediation and see how we can benefit from that.
Thanks for your comments.
Aslo don't worry about the threat your uncle gave of contacting embbasy...
Good luck...
tabletpc,
thanks for your suggession, I believe we have a good lawyer (he is a civil lawyer) and seems to be a person of integrity so I am hoping that side is take care of,
I am really worried about my uncle doing something crazy and thats why I need to get a good criminal lawyer who is also familiar with the NRI aspect of the law.
Anyways I will talk to my lawyer about the mediation and see how we can benefit from that.
Thanks for your comments.
ras
06-13 12:18 PM
I have a loan there too and I asked a couple of financial advisor - They all had the same opinion. If someone finds out otherwise please let us know.
Thanks
I contacted a cpa and they said it is possible.
Thanks
I contacted a cpa and they said it is possible.
psk79
11-01 06:42 PM
Like I said earlier, i got my returned FP notices in mail. So ANYBODY WITH SUCH AN ONLINE STATUS, CAN YOU TELL ME IF THEIR ONLINE STATUS WILL CHANGE BACK TO ENDING AT ALL??
or is it going to just stay like this "document mailed" until we get approved ????????????? just wondering how to get this status thing updated????????????
or is it going to just stay like this "document mailed" until we get approved ????????????? just wondering how to get this status thing updated????????????
No comments:
Post a Comment