eb3retro
09-06 07:57 PM
you forgot to add one more point..which I did for you..
Take a look at who is against me?
1. people whose's PD is now CURRENT. they do not want more people to be CURRENT when their case is still pending.
2. People who are EB3. which is not going to move at all.
3. IV member who are not interested in pushing PD for the time being. People like June, 2006, July 2006 is not their interest to help.
4. For opening one of the dumb thread.
What is wrong to think postive for the people who are close to be CURRENT at this moment?
you cold people.
Take a look at who is against me?
1. people whose's PD is now CURRENT. they do not want more people to be CURRENT when their case is still pending.
2. People who are EB3. which is not going to move at all.
3. IV member who are not interested in pushing PD for the time being. People like June, 2006, July 2006 is not their interest to help.
4. For opening one of the dumb thread.
What is wrong to think postive for the people who are close to be CURRENT at this moment?
you cold people.
wallpaper Hairstyle 2010 2011
hoolahoous
02-06 01:43 PM
Is it ok to have a gap between H1B expiry date (say July 31, 2008) and start of EAD (Oct 1, 2008) when a person is in AOS?
I would think it would be okay since AOS is a status (not EAD) which you maintain. EAD just allows you to work for anyone (but not maintain status. For status you use AOS/485)
I would think it would be okay since AOS is a status (not EAD) which you maintain. EAD just allows you to work for anyone (but not maintain status. For status you use AOS/485)
wandmaker
10-03 12:13 PM
we have a long way to go, IV needs your support. contribute.
2011 Posted in: Hairstyles,Rihanna
Ennada
11-13 10:26 AM
I am ready to help. I got GC this Sept. Still active and want to stay active for the cause.
Please feel free to email me when need arises.
Please feel free to email me when need arises.
more...
ShantiRam
07-17 11:12 AM
But can the core members know for sure what CIS is going to do? I mean guys sitting on the top of CIS are the one making the decisions and I dont beleive IV members will be paged by CIS when a decision is made. I also do not beleive that CIS is negotiating with any non government organization (i,e AILA, IV or anyone else). I doubt if anything is going to happen..after all but I sincerely hope I am proved wrong.
anilsal
10-23 09:49 PM
Interestingly, the article by Erin lists a number of organizations working on various issues affecting Indians. It may be worthwhile to contact each of those organizations and appraise them of the issues with legal immigration. Some of them may add our agenda to theirs.
Since retrogression (and other legal immigration issues) affects Indians along with people of other countries like China, these organizations pushing an agenda for Indians, will in fact, indirectly help legal immigration IMHO.
Since retrogression (and other legal immigration issues) affects Indians along with people of other countries like China, these organizations pushing an agenda for Indians, will in fact, indirectly help legal immigration IMHO.
more...
optimystic
03-27 03:05 PM
~~~ bump ~~~
I think more ideas required. Sooner or later most of the IV members are likely to face this due to GC delays.
1) Say simply "I have work permit and dont need any visa sponsoring" (No need to explain in detail that the work permit allows to work for any company in US etc...simply 'work permit' , and the reason to mention H1B is to divert their attention to another thing thats in your favour)
2) If they ask what kind of work permit...tell them subtly they are not supposed to ask as per law.
3) If they start to dig deeper, then you know that they intend to filter out EAD people.
At that point, if you want to catch them in their act eventually and take them to task, you can lie and say you have green card.Especially to middlemen recruiters who are not going to do the eventual hiring anyway. But only lie orally and not in any written or electronic form. And be as subtle and vague as you can.
If its a direct company trying to hire you, then tell them "I have all required docs and will provide at I-9". If they still insist on finding out about EAD.....I dont know if it will help to tell the truth and be left stranded with no response and no proof to take them to task....or get vindictive and to lie thru your teeth and gather as much proof as possible to arm yourself with to possibly complain when they reject you at hiring stage when they realise you have no GC.
[when I say 'vindictive' its not in the negative sense of the word...]
I think more ideas required. Sooner or later most of the IV members are likely to face this due to GC delays.
1) Say simply "I have work permit and dont need any visa sponsoring" (No need to explain in detail that the work permit allows to work for any company in US etc...simply 'work permit' , and the reason to mention H1B is to divert their attention to another thing thats in your favour)
2) If they ask what kind of work permit...tell them subtly they are not supposed to ask as per law.
3) If they start to dig deeper, then you know that they intend to filter out EAD people.
At that point, if you want to catch them in their act eventually and take them to task, you can lie and say you have green card.Especially to middlemen recruiters who are not going to do the eventual hiring anyway. But only lie orally and not in any written or electronic form. And be as subtle and vague as you can.
If its a direct company trying to hire you, then tell them "I have all required docs and will provide at I-9". If they still insist on finding out about EAD.....I dont know if it will help to tell the truth and be left stranded with no response and no proof to take them to task....or get vindictive and to lie thru your teeth and gather as much proof as possible to arm yourself with to possibly complain when they reject you at hiring stage when they realise you have no GC.
[when I say 'vindictive' its not in the negative sense of the word...]
2010 Hairstyles Pictures 2011
psaxena
08-24 03:49 PM
its cheap and something is common in the food and U
that is the word "CHEAP".
Let me know where to send $$ so that you can buy dog food, but this donation will be a reimbursement on presenting the reciepts.
Why dont you donate money to me and I can decide what I would like to eat.
Donating leftovers shows what kind of donor you are...
that is the word "CHEAP".
Let me know where to send $$ so that you can buy dog food, but this donation will be a reimbursement on presenting the reciepts.
Why dont you donate money to me and I can decide what I would like to eat.
Donating leftovers shows what kind of donor you are...
more...
jnayar2006
03-23 08:38 AM
sent the following comment:
=============================================
As a highly skilled and qualified (legal) alien worker in the high-tech industry, and having worked for US corporations over the last several years, I think this bill has some great provisions to make the process of applying for legal residency more efficient, effective, and above all, humane.
However, the clause that imposes strict country-based caps on employment based immigration is extremely detrimental to employment-based immigration and goes in quite the opposite vein of capturing unused visa numbers and other measures. If skilled workers from particular nations are fulfilling most of the employment needs, and if there are enough visa numbers left over after allocating to applicants from other nations, currently the remaining visa numbers are distributed in a fair manner among applicants from oversubscribed countries - and this clause favorable to legal skilled immigration is removed in the latest bill introduced by the Senator. I urge the Senator and other proponents of legal immigration who know of the immense benefit to the nation from educated and highly skilled legal immigrants to rethink the removal of these favorable clauses from the comprehensive immigration reform bill. Soft-cap on country quotas (and redistribution of *unused* visas after the diversity-based allocation is done) is based on sound economic principles of matching demand and supply. Thank you.
=============================================
=============================================
As a highly skilled and qualified (legal) alien worker in the high-tech industry, and having worked for US corporations over the last several years, I think this bill has some great provisions to make the process of applying for legal residency more efficient, effective, and above all, humane.
However, the clause that imposes strict country-based caps on employment based immigration is extremely detrimental to employment-based immigration and goes in quite the opposite vein of capturing unused visa numbers and other measures. If skilled workers from particular nations are fulfilling most of the employment needs, and if there are enough visa numbers left over after allocating to applicants from other nations, currently the remaining visa numbers are distributed in a fair manner among applicants from oversubscribed countries - and this clause favorable to legal skilled immigration is removed in the latest bill introduced by the Senator. I urge the Senator and other proponents of legal immigration who know of the immense benefit to the nation from educated and highly skilled legal immigrants to rethink the removal of these favorable clauses from the comprehensive immigration reform bill. Soft-cap on country quotas (and redistribution of *unused* visas after the diversity-based allocation is done) is based on sound economic principles of matching demand and supply. Thank you.
=============================================
hair rihanna-hairstyle
gc_on_demand
10-13 01:16 PM
I was in same boat. Desi company was not giving me ref letter and I asked my EX - colleague who was not with desi company any more and he gave me noterised letter on his current company and it worked. I had same job duties but desi company denied to give detail letter . They gave me simple letter with title and duration.
more...
gdilla
07-23 07:24 PM
Well, i'll let you know if i get rejected there, homes. If I knew that was the case, then I'd do it anyways. i won't let this country hold me hostage. It's not a big deal. So what if you go to canada for 3 days.... sheesh. Do you know how many Canadians immigrating to the US criss-cross the border everyday? It's a boatload. They have business on both sides, meetings, etc. No Canadian would get a GC if that were the case.
Just because you got admitted in to US doesn't mean a thing as far as GC processing is concerned. I wouldn't risk it.
Just because you got admitted in to US doesn't mean a thing as far as GC processing is concerned. I wouldn't risk it.
hot Rihanna#39;s long red hairstyle
hello
05-11 09:59 AM
Dream Act Reintroduced Today
more...
house Rihanna New Hairstyle 2011
dallasums
09-06 04:39 PM
Try to get through TTK services any official documents..though you may need to spend some money.
Here is the url www.yourmaninindia.com
Here is the url www.yourmaninindia.com
tattoo Rihanna+haircut+2011
immi_seeker
09-28 09:37 AM
Here is my case:
7th year H1 extension expring Feb 2008
I-140 approved in 2006
485/EAD/AP notices received 2 week go.
Now the questions are...
1) What is the advantage of getting H1 extension(once I get the EAD) ? Is it worth ?
2) What is the risk of changing employers after 180 days?
3) What if I continue on H1(same employer) even after getting EAD and if 485 denied ?
4) What if I change my employer and 485 denied ?
5) If my 485 denied and Can I stay as long as my H1 expires(same employer) or has to leave the country immediately?
Any answers or other suggestion would be greatly appreciated........
1.Even if your 485 gets denied you will not be out of status
2.As long as the job is of "similar" category as specified in your LC risk is minimal
3.You have a chance to appeal for motion to reopen the 485
4.No difference even if you work for same employer and 485 is denied
5.Yes, you can stay till end of H1, because you have a valid legal status
7th year H1 extension expring Feb 2008
I-140 approved in 2006
485/EAD/AP notices received 2 week go.
Now the questions are...
1) What is the advantage of getting H1 extension(once I get the EAD) ? Is it worth ?
2) What is the risk of changing employers after 180 days?
3) What if I continue on H1(same employer) even after getting EAD and if 485 denied ?
4) What if I change my employer and 485 denied ?
5) If my 485 denied and Can I stay as long as my H1 expires(same employer) or has to leave the country immediately?
Any answers or other suggestion would be greatly appreciated........
1.Even if your 485 gets denied you will not be out of status
2.As long as the job is of "similar" category as specified in your LC risk is minimal
3.You have a chance to appeal for motion to reopen the 485
4.No difference even if you work for same employer and 485 is denied
5.Yes, you can stay till end of H1, because you have a valid legal status
more...
pictures Rihanna Funky hairstyle
milind70
08-08 11:25 AM
I just have this scenario.
If it sounds stupid just ignore my post.
I am working for company A.
485 has been filed and after 180 days( on the safer side let me say 240 days) i move to Company B.
When i transfer to company B (i think it wont matter if i use H-1B transfer or EAD). Dont want to get into discussion about using H-1B/EAD.
Now if i find Company C who wants to hire me after i get my GC or later on.
Meanwhile USCIS sends me a RFE about my employement, what are my options.
Thanks a lot.
There are some grey areas like GC is for permnanent employement with sponsoring employer. But after acquiring GC you are can change or switch jobs easily. Atleast thats what many people presume but there have been cases when GC was revoke when people jumped jobs in short span after they got their GC when USCIS asked them why thier GC sgould not be revoked when thier intent was not to take up the job offer. But this does nto mean you can switch jobs, you can and you should they dont expect you bound the sponsoring employee for life time. In such cases discreationn of USCIS officer investigating the case comes into picture he uses his judgement like how much time the employee served the employee was it a fair enough move etc Was the intent for empoyement there in the first place etc. Hence you will find that most lawyer sites recommend not to chnage jobs for atleast six months afte getting the GC and mind you all these things are taken into consideration when you apply for naturalization.
Now coming to the question it seems techincaly correct but it there are cases when people used AC21 and they have not been issued RFEs but there are cases when people were issued RFEs when they had used AC21. There is no clear cut answer to this but again the discreation the USCIS officer uses is the intent and secondly also depends the on period elapsed or time for eg. a friend of mine who filed his 485 in 2002 was issued a RFE in 2005 about his employement ,like whom did he work for now and if he did work for the sponsoring employer ,USCIS asked for an employement letter from employer .
Changing employers when you have recnetly got GC can raise question about intent ,this might affect naturalization or questions raised right away after the move is made(even though this is rare unless someone complains ) but deifnately your LPR case is reviewed during naturalization .
If it sounds stupid just ignore my post.
I am working for company A.
485 has been filed and after 180 days( on the safer side let me say 240 days) i move to Company B.
When i transfer to company B (i think it wont matter if i use H-1B transfer or EAD). Dont want to get into discussion about using H-1B/EAD.
Now if i find Company C who wants to hire me after i get my GC or later on.
Meanwhile USCIS sends me a RFE about my employement, what are my options.
Thanks a lot.
There are some grey areas like GC is for permnanent employement with sponsoring employer. But after acquiring GC you are can change or switch jobs easily. Atleast thats what many people presume but there have been cases when GC was revoke when people jumped jobs in short span after they got their GC when USCIS asked them why thier GC sgould not be revoked when thier intent was not to take up the job offer. But this does nto mean you can switch jobs, you can and you should they dont expect you bound the sponsoring employee for life time. In such cases discreationn of USCIS officer investigating the case comes into picture he uses his judgement like how much time the employee served the employee was it a fair enough move etc Was the intent for empoyement there in the first place etc. Hence you will find that most lawyer sites recommend not to chnage jobs for atleast six months afte getting the GC and mind you all these things are taken into consideration when you apply for naturalization.
Now coming to the question it seems techincaly correct but it there are cases when people used AC21 and they have not been issued RFEs but there are cases when people were issued RFEs when they had used AC21. There is no clear cut answer to this but again the discreation the USCIS officer uses is the intent and secondly also depends the on period elapsed or time for eg. a friend of mine who filed his 485 in 2002 was issued a RFE in 2005 about his employement ,like whom did he work for now and if he did work for the sponsoring employer ,USCIS asked for an employement letter from employer .
Changing employers when you have recnetly got GC can raise question about intent ,this might affect naturalization or questions raised right away after the move is made(even though this is rare unless someone complains ) but deifnately your LPR case is reviewed during naturalization .
dresses rihanna haircuts 2011. rihanna
gimme_GC2006
05-08 04:28 PM
hehehhe..I have Wii :D
Also, I think I will start visiting AINP forums now..this is becoming such a hopeless thing.
I am not sure if making noise is going to yield any benefit as it is going to be, "GC is a privilege not a right" thing..
:cool::cool:
Also, I think I will start visiting AINP forums now..this is becoming such a hopeless thing.
I am not sure if making noise is going to yield any benefit as it is going to be, "GC is a privilege not a right" thing..
:cool::cool:
more...
makeup celebrity Rihanna Short Pixie
fromnaija
12-09 10:21 AM
In your fianc�'s case, make sure you are married before you file 485. You will need to put her name on your 485. You don't have to wait until she completes her HRR.
girlfriend Rihanna Hairstyles. http
Bimmer740i
07-20 01:31 PM
I've seen UnitedNations on these (IV) forums. Search with his handle and send a PM.
hairstyles 2011 Rihanna Hairstyles
sumansk
02-09 07:30 PM
Dont Worry... While the time your 485 is adjusted.. the law would be in place called the CIR to take care of retrogression ann u would be able to go back and come back and apply for GC with approval date within 6 months or less.
So njy yr freedom..and forget abt denial...Life is too short for all these tensions...:):D
So njy yr freedom..and forget abt denial...Life is too short for all these tensions...:):D
dummgelauft
11-12 06:53 PM
Te bill isuseless.. it mentions against employing foreign worker but companies can always outsource .........
Take the job to the worker, if you can not bring the worker to the job...
Precisely the reason Microsoft and Google have operations in Canada.
These two lawmakers are engaging in nothing less than a witch hunt.
Also, I believe (correct me me if I am wrong), Grassley is up for re-election for 2010....he is trying to position himself in line with his constituents.
Take the job to the worker, if you can not bring the worker to the job...
Precisely the reason Microsoft and Google have operations in Canada.
These two lawmakers are engaging in nothing less than a witch hunt.
Also, I believe (correct me me if I am wrong), Grassley is up for re-election for 2010....he is trying to position himself in line with his constituents.
nivedit.tyagi
02-06 08:50 AM
Rajesh,
Indraneel ,
amsgc,
guyfromsg,
Vik ,
Nikhil
Can we decide upon a time to meet over a weekend to discuss further actions.
You can post your availability here and we can decide.
Lets get the ball rolling from our end.
--
Thanks,
Nivedit
Indraneel ,
amsgc,
guyfromsg,
Vik ,
Nikhil
Can we decide upon a time to meet over a weekend to discuss further actions.
You can post your availability here and we can decide.
Lets get the ball rolling from our end.
--
Thanks,
Nivedit
No comments:
Post a Comment