pappu
07-30 12:05 PM
Ok well this discussion is not going anywhere. The whole point of the flowers campaign is to make the CHC realize that they can help the illegals without damaging provisions for legal immigrants right now. The illegals issue will take a LOT more thought than the issues faced by the legals. THAT is the point we are trying to drive home via the flowers campaign.
However if the IV core thinks this is a bad idea, then there is no point in doing this now.
If the flower campaign is getting old, let us do a "Fruits of our Labour" campaign on Labour Day.
On a lighter note:
Now I had suggested the IV DC Rally back in March of 2006 and it was termed by the Core/Legal counsel as a bad idea. Guess what happend after a year and half? The DC rally in Sep 2007. Let's hope the same thing doesnt happen for this flower campaign.
If a rally was done in March 2006, I doubt even 500 people would have come. IV was new. IV did not have enough funds for it..People were not confident about protest too. It was only after the San Jose rally and Flower campaign and doing lobbying for one and a half year, the community got confident. IV membership also grew by that time. So with the idea, timing also needs to be right.
However if the IV core thinks this is a bad idea, then there is no point in doing this now.
If the flower campaign is getting old, let us do a "Fruits of our Labour" campaign on Labour Day.
On a lighter note:
Now I had suggested the IV DC Rally back in March of 2006 and it was termed by the Core/Legal counsel as a bad idea. Guess what happend after a year and half? The DC rally in Sep 2007. Let's hope the same thing doesnt happen for this flower campaign.
If a rally was done in March 2006, I doubt even 500 people would have come. IV was new. IV did not have enough funds for it..People were not confident about protest too. It was only after the San Jose rally and Flower campaign and doing lobbying for one and a half year, the community got confident. IV membership also grew by that time. So with the idea, timing also needs to be right.
wallpaper Zac Efron And Vanessa Hudgens
sb724
10-08 02:56 PM
Hi Mygc2006,
Can you let us know which code is mentioned for your kids in finger print notice.
My kid got notice with code 2
Thanks
I have two kids, my son is 8 years and daughter is 5 years old. Since it clearly says in 485 form that FP is not required for kids below 14, we didn't pay for FP fee of kids and attorney confirmed it then. We got FP notices for me and my wife on Aug 1st and we completed it. Later on after a week we received FP notices for my son and daughter for Aug 23rd even though we didn't send the FP $ for them. We just went and completed the FP for kids on Aug 23rd :)
I know one of my friend who sent FP money for his kids along with 485 application even though they were below 14 and he did get FP notice for them and they all got GC approved now. He was a March filer.
Can you let us know which code is mentioned for your kids in finger print notice.
My kid got notice with code 2
Thanks
I have two kids, my son is 8 years and daughter is 5 years old. Since it clearly says in 485 form that FP is not required for kids below 14, we didn't pay for FP fee of kids and attorney confirmed it then. We got FP notices for me and my wife on Aug 1st and we completed it. Later on after a week we received FP notices for my son and daughter for Aug 23rd even though we didn't send the FP $ for them. We just went and completed the FP for kids on Aug 23rd :)
I know one of my friend who sent FP money for his kids along with 485 application even though they were below 14 and he did get FP notice for them and they all got GC approved now. He was a March filer.
HV000
04-14 07:38 PM
Hi guys,
If you want mre data on whats going on, I finally got my welcome notice today. My PD is July 24- 2003 EB2 category.
Good luck for everyone is fighting for GC. Everybody's day will come.
Thanks
Congrats! I guess you filed at TSC??
If you want mre data on whats going on, I finally got my welcome notice today. My PD is July 24- 2003 EB2 category.
Good luck for everyone is fighting for GC. Everybody's day will come.
Thanks
Congrats! I guess you filed at TSC??
2011 Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens
optimystic
02-28 05:48 PM
We got our EADs in Nov 2007. My wife has ITIN (she is a housewife and we dont have any plans in near future for her to work). Is it mandatory that we should apply for her SSN now that she has an EAD and eligible to get SSN? I know having SSN is good for a lot of reasons (building credit history, job purposes etc), but just wondering if we need to apply now or could wait until the tax filing rush this year and apply in May/June...
more...
Eternal_Hope
12-12 01:36 PM
Although there doesn't seem to be much support for this campaign, there is no harm in throwing these suggestions out there:
1. To have any small impact we should have 100s if not 1000s of people mailing their credentials.
2. There should be a date decided around which everyone would mail their stuff.
3. The mailings should be to atleast a few common addresses (maybe some prominent senate and house members).
4. The cover letter should be common for everyone, expressing why we are mailing these degrees.
5. The personal letter should be ...well....personal.
6. We should not make any markings, coloring on the degree granting instiution's name as a mark of respect to the alma-mater. Maybe we can put black dots on the edges, or something symbolic of this nature.
If there is sufficient interest among IV members then please let it be known on this thread immediately.
I volunteer to be part of the group which can coordinate this.
1. To have any small impact we should have 100s if not 1000s of people mailing their credentials.
2. There should be a date decided around which everyone would mail their stuff.
3. The mailings should be to atleast a few common addresses (maybe some prominent senate and house members).
4. The cover letter should be common for everyone, expressing why we are mailing these degrees.
5. The personal letter should be ...well....personal.
6. We should not make any markings, coloring on the degree granting instiution's name as a mark of respect to the alma-mater. Maybe we can put black dots on the edges, or something symbolic of this nature.
If there is sufficient interest among IV members then please let it be known on this thread immediately.
I volunteer to be part of the group which can coordinate this.
a_to_z_gc
06-05 05:42 PM
That's not a good sign. Looks like instead of processing the Labor, they have now adopted to torment people by asking their credentials...
God help us...
Philli
God help us...
Philli
more...
gcapplicant05
03-10 11:49 PM
I just got a letter in the mail stating that my GC is approved. When would my GC card be mailed ?.
On a thankful note, My experience with Jean Martin has been very good. There was no hickup at any stage. Some of my friends were caught up with their employers who would either slow down the filings to retaing the employee for a longer period or negotiate harder. With such apprehensions I had pursued my GC process. Except for a few administrative delays here and there mine was a smooth sailing. My salary went from 60K 4 years back to over 150K at present. I had referred 3 of my friends so far who just got their I-140 filed.
As far as the "DOL audit", I did not receive any such notifications and 2 more of my friends even got their H1's approved in Feb' 08 !
Forums are being used to just air grieviences, but I think we should also comment org's which do a good job. My 2 cents
On a thankful note, My experience with Jean Martin has been very good. There was no hickup at any stage. Some of my friends were caught up with their employers who would either slow down the filings to retaing the employee for a longer period or negotiate harder. With such apprehensions I had pursued my GC process. Except for a few administrative delays here and there mine was a smooth sailing. My salary went from 60K 4 years back to over 150K at present. I had referred 3 of my friends so far who just got their I-140 filed.
As far as the "DOL audit", I did not receive any such notifications and 2 more of my friends even got their H1's approved in Feb' 08 !
Forums are being used to just air grieviences, but I think we should also comment org's which do a good job. My 2 cents
2010 zac efron and vanessa hudgens
J
06-29 12:13 AM
wow all r gud entries :pleased:
i voted for freeskier89 Gallery though :P
i voted for freeskier89 Gallery though :P
more...
gillella
10-04 05:20 PM
I just cancelled previously scheduled appointment (28 feb 2007) for my parents and re-scheduled it for 2nd Nov 2006
hair Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens
kate123
09-21 02:37 PM
Please complain to DOL.. I worked with a company for about 9 months and later on I even gave notice 1 month in advance,, but still my employer didnt pay me for the last month... I complained to dept of labor few days ago. I won the case and they said I will get the money with in 2 or 3 days.
Please complain about these fraudsters!!!
Please complain about these fraudsters!!!
more...
karthik204
05-31 11:59 AM
� Increased employer obligations. The bill would impose stringent new requirements on all H-1B employers. Under current law, employers who are deemed to be H-1B dependent � i.e., employers with more than 15% of their workforce comprised of H-1B workers � and employers who have violated labor requirements are required to attest that they have not displaced U.S. workers in the hiring of an H-1B employer and that they have attempted to recruit U.S. workers for open positions. The Senate bill would extend these requirements to all H-1B employers (though a proposed amendment to the bill, discussed below, would dispense with the broadening of the attestation requirements). In addition, employers would be subject to outplacement restrictions, which would limit their ability to place H-1B workers at client sites.
� Increased government audits, investigations and penalties. The bill would expand the Department of Labor's authority to investigate matters related to labor condition application (LCA) compliance, and would authorize DOL to conduct annual audits of at least one percent of all H-1B employers in a given year. Penalties for LCA violations would be doubled.
� Impact on permanent residence. The bill's impact on an H-1B nonimmigrant's ability to apply for permanent residence is unclear. Under current law, both H and L nomimmigrants benefit from the "dual intent" doctrine, which allows these foreign nationals to pursue immigrant visas without jeopardizing their nonimmigrant status. The Senate bill would eliminate certain facets of the dual intent doctrine, but would continue to allow H nonimmigrants to seek extensions of their nonimmigrant stay past the six-year limitation if they are the beneficiaries of a pending merit-based immigrant petition.
Additional Requirements for the L-1 Visa Category
The bill would impose increased requirements and restrictions on L-1 petitions filed on behalf of foreign nationals entering the United States to establish a new office. New office petitions would be required to be supported by detailed business plans and evidence of sufficient funds and physical premises adequate for operation of the office, and would be approved for an initial period of no more than 12 months. L-2 spouses of new office intracompany transferees would be ineligible for employment authorization during the initial 12 months. In addition, the bill would authorize the Department of Homeland Security to conduct audits of at least one percent of all L-1 employers in a given year, and employers who fail to comply with the requirements of the L-1 program would be subject to penalties and debarment.
Changes to the F Student Visa Program
Some favorable changes are proposed for the F student visa category. The bill would increase the optional practical training (OPT) period from the current 12 months to 24 months, and would increase off-campus employment opportunities for students, subject to wage and recruitment requirements. A new F-4 student visa category would be created for foreign nationals pursuing advanced degrees in mathematics, engineering, information technology or natural sciences, and these individuals would be eligible to pursue permanent residence without jeopardizing their nonimmigrant status.
Revamped Temporary Worker Program
S. 1348 would create a new Y nonimmigrant temporary worker category, which would ultimately incorporate the existing H-2A agricultural worker program and the H-2B nonagricultural worker programs and re-designate those programs as Y-2A and Y-2B, with substantially increased quotas. The bill would also create a new Y-1 category, which would permit the admission of up to 200,000 temporary nonagricultural workers for initial periods of up to two years, subject to recruitment and wage requirements. Y-1 nonimmigrants would be eligible for two additional two-year periods of stay, though they would be required to depart the United States for at least 12 months abroad between periods of stay. Y-1 nonimmigrants accompanied or joined by dependents would be limited to two two-year periods of stay, and would be subject to income requirements and limitations on stay for family members. The Y-2B category would admit up to 100,000 temporary nonagricultural workers for non-renewable periods of stay of 10 months. The Y nonimmigrant category would not take effect until certain border security and enforcement programs are instituted. Until implementation of the Y program, the bill would retain the current temporary worker programs, but the H-2A category would be subject to additional employer obligations.
Worksite Enforcement and Employment Eligibility Verification
Under current law, employers are required to verify the eligibility of all new hires by examining documents that establish a worker's identity and employment authorization and to make attestations of compliance on Form I-9. In addition, employers may currently elect to participate on a voluntary basis in the Basic Pilot Program, an electronic system that verifies workers' employment authorization against government databases.
The Senate bill would retain the I-9 attestation system, but would reduce the number of documents that a foreign national could use to demonstrate identity and employment authorization. The bill would also substantially increase employers' record retention obligations from the current three-year maximum to seven years. In addition, the proposal would essentially expand the Basic Pilot program, requiring all employers to participate in an electronic eligibility verification system that would be phased in for new hires within 18 months after enactment. Within three years of enactment, employers would be required to use the system to re-verify the employment eligibility of all employees � an estimated 145 million workers. The bill would also impose substantially higher penalties for worksite violations.
Regularization Program for Undocumented Immigrants
S. 1348 aims to resolve the status of the undocumented population by introducing a new Z nonimmigrant visa category that would permit eligible undocumented workers and their family members to regularize their status and eventually apply for permanent residence. Z nonimmigrants would be granted an initial period of stay of four years, renewable indefinitely in four-year increments. These individuals would ultimately be eligible to apply for permanent residence during a five-year period after immigrant visa backlogs in the family and employment categories are eliminated. To obtain permanent residence, Z nonimmigrants would be subject to a merit-based points evaluation that would assess their U.S. employment history, home ownership, medical insurance and other criteria. They would also be required to depart the United States and return to their home countries (or "touch back") in order to establish eligibility for permanent residence.
Proposed Amendments to the Senate Bill
Late last week, Senators Maria Cantwell (D-WA), John Cornyn (R-TX), Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) announced an amendment to the Senate bill that would make important changes to several of the employment-related provisions of the Senate bill. With respect to immigrant visas, the amendment would restructure the proposed merit-based program to add several of the features of the current employment-based system. The amendment would add an employer sponsorship component, and would create programs equivalent to the first, second and third employment-based preference categories for foreign nationals of extraordinary ability, outstanding professors and researchers, multinational executives and managers, advanced degree professionals, foreign nationals of exceptional ability, and professional workers (though the amendment would not provide for an equivalent to the current "other worker" subcategory). The amendment would also restore the labor certification requirement for the second and third employment-based preference categories, but would not provide for a national interest waiver of the requirement. In addition, the amendment proposes an additional 140,000 immigrant visa numbers for employer-sponsored merit immigrants, and would create a quota exemption for certain highly skilled immigrants who have at least three years of U.S. work experience. Regarding the H-1B program, the amendment would eliminate the 20,000 ceiling on cap exemptions for foreign nationals holding advanced degrees from U.S. universities and create a new exemption for foreign nationals holding foreign advanced degrees in the sciences, technology, engineering or mathematics. The amendment would also dispense with the Senate bill's expansion of the recruitment and non-displacement attestation requirement to all H-1B employers.
� Increased government audits, investigations and penalties. The bill would expand the Department of Labor's authority to investigate matters related to labor condition application (LCA) compliance, and would authorize DOL to conduct annual audits of at least one percent of all H-1B employers in a given year. Penalties for LCA violations would be doubled.
� Impact on permanent residence. The bill's impact on an H-1B nonimmigrant's ability to apply for permanent residence is unclear. Under current law, both H and L nomimmigrants benefit from the "dual intent" doctrine, which allows these foreign nationals to pursue immigrant visas without jeopardizing their nonimmigrant status. The Senate bill would eliminate certain facets of the dual intent doctrine, but would continue to allow H nonimmigrants to seek extensions of their nonimmigrant stay past the six-year limitation if they are the beneficiaries of a pending merit-based immigrant petition.
Additional Requirements for the L-1 Visa Category
The bill would impose increased requirements and restrictions on L-1 petitions filed on behalf of foreign nationals entering the United States to establish a new office. New office petitions would be required to be supported by detailed business plans and evidence of sufficient funds and physical premises adequate for operation of the office, and would be approved for an initial period of no more than 12 months. L-2 spouses of new office intracompany transferees would be ineligible for employment authorization during the initial 12 months. In addition, the bill would authorize the Department of Homeland Security to conduct audits of at least one percent of all L-1 employers in a given year, and employers who fail to comply with the requirements of the L-1 program would be subject to penalties and debarment.
Changes to the F Student Visa Program
Some favorable changes are proposed for the F student visa category. The bill would increase the optional practical training (OPT) period from the current 12 months to 24 months, and would increase off-campus employment opportunities for students, subject to wage and recruitment requirements. A new F-4 student visa category would be created for foreign nationals pursuing advanced degrees in mathematics, engineering, information technology or natural sciences, and these individuals would be eligible to pursue permanent residence without jeopardizing their nonimmigrant status.
Revamped Temporary Worker Program
S. 1348 would create a new Y nonimmigrant temporary worker category, which would ultimately incorporate the existing H-2A agricultural worker program and the H-2B nonagricultural worker programs and re-designate those programs as Y-2A and Y-2B, with substantially increased quotas. The bill would also create a new Y-1 category, which would permit the admission of up to 200,000 temporary nonagricultural workers for initial periods of up to two years, subject to recruitment and wage requirements. Y-1 nonimmigrants would be eligible for two additional two-year periods of stay, though they would be required to depart the United States for at least 12 months abroad between periods of stay. Y-1 nonimmigrants accompanied or joined by dependents would be limited to two two-year periods of stay, and would be subject to income requirements and limitations on stay for family members. The Y-2B category would admit up to 100,000 temporary nonagricultural workers for non-renewable periods of stay of 10 months. The Y nonimmigrant category would not take effect until certain border security and enforcement programs are instituted. Until implementation of the Y program, the bill would retain the current temporary worker programs, but the H-2A category would be subject to additional employer obligations.
Worksite Enforcement and Employment Eligibility Verification
Under current law, employers are required to verify the eligibility of all new hires by examining documents that establish a worker's identity and employment authorization and to make attestations of compliance on Form I-9. In addition, employers may currently elect to participate on a voluntary basis in the Basic Pilot Program, an electronic system that verifies workers' employment authorization against government databases.
The Senate bill would retain the I-9 attestation system, but would reduce the number of documents that a foreign national could use to demonstrate identity and employment authorization. The bill would also substantially increase employers' record retention obligations from the current three-year maximum to seven years. In addition, the proposal would essentially expand the Basic Pilot program, requiring all employers to participate in an electronic eligibility verification system that would be phased in for new hires within 18 months after enactment. Within three years of enactment, employers would be required to use the system to re-verify the employment eligibility of all employees � an estimated 145 million workers. The bill would also impose substantially higher penalties for worksite violations.
Regularization Program for Undocumented Immigrants
S. 1348 aims to resolve the status of the undocumented population by introducing a new Z nonimmigrant visa category that would permit eligible undocumented workers and their family members to regularize their status and eventually apply for permanent residence. Z nonimmigrants would be granted an initial period of stay of four years, renewable indefinitely in four-year increments. These individuals would ultimately be eligible to apply for permanent residence during a five-year period after immigrant visa backlogs in the family and employment categories are eliminated. To obtain permanent residence, Z nonimmigrants would be subject to a merit-based points evaluation that would assess their U.S. employment history, home ownership, medical insurance and other criteria. They would also be required to depart the United States and return to their home countries (or "touch back") in order to establish eligibility for permanent residence.
Proposed Amendments to the Senate Bill
Late last week, Senators Maria Cantwell (D-WA), John Cornyn (R-TX), Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) announced an amendment to the Senate bill that would make important changes to several of the employment-related provisions of the Senate bill. With respect to immigrant visas, the amendment would restructure the proposed merit-based program to add several of the features of the current employment-based system. The amendment would add an employer sponsorship component, and would create programs equivalent to the first, second and third employment-based preference categories for foreign nationals of extraordinary ability, outstanding professors and researchers, multinational executives and managers, advanced degree professionals, foreign nationals of exceptional ability, and professional workers (though the amendment would not provide for an equivalent to the current "other worker" subcategory). The amendment would also restore the labor certification requirement for the second and third employment-based preference categories, but would not provide for a national interest waiver of the requirement. In addition, the amendment proposes an additional 140,000 immigrant visa numbers for employer-sponsored merit immigrants, and would create a quota exemption for certain highly skilled immigrants who have at least three years of U.S. work experience. Regarding the H-1B program, the amendment would eliminate the 20,000 ceiling on cap exemptions for foreign nationals holding advanced degrees from U.S. universities and create a new exemption for foreign nationals holding foreign advanced degrees in the sciences, technology, engineering or mathematics. The amendment would also dispense with the Senate bill's expansion of the recruitment and non-displacement attestation requirement to all H-1B employers.
hot zac efron and vanessa hudgens
santiwar
04-28 01:13 PM
Feels like 1998 all over again. Guys, this is a forum related to immigration, not some Aptech/NIIT message board :p
more...
house A scroungy looking Zac Efron
sukhwinderd
10-09 10:27 PM
I guess you are missing a few points...
1. The backlog does not include the oncoming requests for the other categories (which is fine for EB3, because even EB3-ROW is back-logged)
2. Fall-over across categories .. and since EB3-ROW itself is backlogged, there is no fall-over for EB3 I/C/M
3. Fall-down happens in a sequence, ie EB5 -> EB1 -> EB2 -> EB3 .. since EB2 itself has over-subscribed categories, there is nothing which falls down to EB3
Hence EB3 roughly gets only its quota... which for over-subscribed is ~3k
i think you are counting spillover across categories within same country but not spillover across countries as per stated in the law and my first post. so if spillover across countries is applied then all unused visas should trickle down to backlogged countries.
(A) EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS NOT SUBJECT TO PER COUNTRY LIMITATION IF ADDITIONAL VISAS AVAILABLE
1. The backlog does not include the oncoming requests for the other categories (which is fine for EB3, because even EB3-ROW is back-logged)
2. Fall-over across categories .. and since EB3-ROW itself is backlogged, there is no fall-over for EB3 I/C/M
3. Fall-down happens in a sequence, ie EB5 -> EB1 -> EB2 -> EB3 .. since EB2 itself has over-subscribed categories, there is nothing which falls down to EB3
Hence EB3 roughly gets only its quota... which for over-subscribed is ~3k
i think you are counting spillover across categories within same country but not spillover across countries as per stated in the law and my first post. so if spillover across countries is applied then all unused visas should trickle down to backlogged countries.
(A) EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS NOT SUBJECT TO PER COUNTRY LIMITATION IF ADDITIONAL VISAS AVAILABLE
tattoo Efron made Vanessa Hudgens
pappu
06-16 05:34 PM
sent to my attorney Dehai Tao.
Thank you.
Pls request your attorneys to sign up for this Free publicity feature for them on IV.
Thank you.
Pls request your attorneys to sign up for this Free publicity feature for them on IV.
more...
pictures zac efron and vanessa hudgens
insbaby
05-26 05:29 PM
May be we need a H1B Classification System
---------------------------------------------------
H1B Infant/Toddler - Just get approval notice
H1B Kids - 1 - 3 Years
H1B Adult - 4 - 6 years
H1B Parent - 7 - 10 Years
H1B GrandParent - 11 - 15 Years
H1B Duck - 16 Years and above
---------------------------------------------------
Looks like we have more H1B Parents now...
---------------------------------------------------
H1B Infant/Toddler - Just get approval notice
H1B Kids - 1 - 3 Years
H1B Adult - 4 - 6 years
H1B Parent - 7 - 10 Years
H1B GrandParent - 11 - 15 Years
H1B Duck - 16 Years and above
---------------------------------------------------
Looks like we have more H1B Parents now...
dresses Zac Efron and Vanessa
CrazyWorld
09-03 10:30 PM
No, now I am a W2 employee with company "A" who sponsored my GC, I want to move to company "B" on 1099 basis. Company "B" can provide me a EVL if needed. company "A" is NOT going to withdraw 140 as well.
1099 cannot be the ONLY source of income on EAD (while 485 pending).
1099 means Independent Contractor (IC) means you are working for a client and they pay you for the services u performed on 1099.
AC 21 is for those who switch employers.... but you are not switching employer... If you are an IC then you don't have an employer (self-employed) and you get paid by a client for the services you perform to them.
I hope this helps...
1099 cannot be the ONLY source of income on EAD (while 485 pending).
1099 means Independent Contractor (IC) means you are working for a client and they pay you for the services u performed on 1099.
AC 21 is for those who switch employers.... but you are not switching employer... If you are an IC then you don't have an employer (self-employed) and you get paid by a client for the services you perform to them.
I hope this helps...
more...
makeup Zac Efron, Vanessa Hudgens
ajaykk
07-19 10:55 AM
Thanks tx Guy, nkhari for your inputs and Thank You desi3933 for your reply. Appreciate it.
girlfriend Zac Efron And Vanessa Hudgens
nayekal
03-26 06:22 PM
I am just applying for it as a back...
1. Go to this link to take skills assessment
http://www.acs.org.au/index.cfm?action=show&conID=skillassessment
2. You can take IELTS before applying for Australian GC.
3. Check here to access the number of points you can get (you should get atleast 120 Points)
http://www.workpermit.com/australia/point_calculator.htm
4. You can go over here to find the details regarding applying for Australian GC
http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/skilled-workers/
Good Luck..
1. Go to this link to take skills assessment
http://www.acs.org.au/index.cfm?action=show&conID=skillassessment
2. You can take IELTS before applying for Australian GC.
3. Check here to access the number of points you can get (you should get atleast 120 Points)
http://www.workpermit.com/australia/point_calculator.htm
4. You can go over here to find the details regarding applying for Australian GC
http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/skilled-workers/
Good Luck..
hairstyles Vanessa Hudgens and Zac Efron
lostinbeta
10-21 06:20 PM
How to use QuicK Masks....
Select the layer with your image.....
Underneith the Foreground and Background colors in the Tools Toolbar there will be two rectangles, one on the left that is a white rectangle with a white circle inside... this is to stop using quick mask... on the right there is a dark rectangle with a white circle inside, this is to entery quick mask mode.
Click the one to enter quick mask mode.
Use the paint brush tool (best at a small size and used with the softer brushes), With the brush, fill in the area that you DO NOT want to be selected (in this case, your body)
Now hit the button to exit the quick mask and the area surrounding the spot you colored it will be selected. Now you can just delete this and be left with your head :)
I hope that helps.
Select the layer with your image.....
Underneith the Foreground and Background colors in the Tools Toolbar there will be two rectangles, one on the left that is a white rectangle with a white circle inside... this is to stop using quick mask... on the right there is a dark rectangle with a white circle inside, this is to entery quick mask mode.
Click the one to enter quick mask mode.
Use the paint brush tool (best at a small size and used with the softer brushes), With the brush, fill in the area that you DO NOT want to be selected (in this case, your body)
Now hit the button to exit the quick mask and the area surrounding the spot you colored it will be selected. Now you can just delete this and be left with your head :)
I hope that helps.
moonrah
06-26 02:18 AM
hey stop bashing the bush admin for everything that's happening. If at all someone's helping our cause it's the repubs, and not the dems who are more concerned with appeasing the illegals.
body....nobody is bashing anybody...please read the post carefully and be objective abt it..
body....nobody is bashing anybody...please read the post carefully and be objective abt it..
whitecollarslave
04-10 04:44 PM
Purgan, read the 2007 Ombudsmans report for other examples of disparity in processing at different centers.
But again, people are losing sight of the main issue: that you cannot set cutoff dates by PD and use RD as the criterial for processing. Either at TSC or at NSC. That is what the campaign/letters should be about.
Well said. Can this be part of the so called "Phase II" of the campaign?
But again, people are losing sight of the main issue: that you cannot set cutoff dates by PD and use RD as the criterial for processing. Either at TSC or at NSC. That is what the campaign/letters should be about.
Well said. Can this be part of the so called "Phase II" of the campaign?
No comments:
Post a Comment