viksi82
11-09 12:13 PM
IS the HDFC bank receipt number a 10 digit one? It has space for only 10 digits on the website while booking an appointment. My number has an 'A' before the 10 digits. When i enter just the 10 digits it says "Cast from string "undefined/undefined/undefined" to type 'Date' is not valid". 2 business days havent been completed yet (since the payment) and that might be one of the reasons but i am not sure yet. Anybody see this before?
Also, as i understand once this goes through, i will be able to fill in the details for the DS-156 and DS-157 automatically and dont need to go to any other site. Appreciate your insight.
Also, as i understand once this goes through, i will be able to fill in the details for the DS-156 and DS-157 automatically and dont need to go to any other site. Appreciate your insight.
wallpaper blue_eyes dog fang game_cg
xyz2005
10-19 01:59 PM
What you say holds good only if USCIS is informed on the job change with AC21 before GC approval.
If you have never informed USCIS about AC21 and your GC got approved, then how are you going to prove to USCIS that you were holding a similar or same position with the new employer during naturalization? Do they accept AC21 papers during naturalization or what?
I 1 million % agree with Munna Bhai and his statements. American desi, AC21 is meaningless if you get GC from new employer and informing USCIS about switch is OPTIONAL. For later Citizenship purposes, just stay with new employer for another 6 months. Munna Bhai is cent percent correct in his recommendations/statements....That is very well documented and discussed in immigration forums etc.
Take care
Best Regards,
If you have never informed USCIS about AC21 and your GC got approved, then how are you going to prove to USCIS that you were holding a similar or same position with the new employer during naturalization? Do they accept AC21 papers during naturalization or what?
I 1 million % agree with Munna Bhai and his statements. American desi, AC21 is meaningless if you get GC from new employer and informing USCIS about switch is OPTIONAL. For later Citizenship purposes, just stay with new employer for another 6 months. Munna Bhai is cent percent correct in his recommendations/statements....That is very well documented and discussed in immigration forums etc.
Take care
Best Regards,
ganguteli
06-10 03:12 PM
If you don't agree, pls. google the cases won on stupid reasons.. One example is as below..
http://trouble.iotashan.com/jokes/stupid-lawsuits.cfm
Why did you not tell us before. You want to fight this case for 'stupid reasons'.
Sorry was pulling your leg.. :D
But I did have valid reasons. We want to know more than 'Yes it is possible/No it is not possible' from legal experts.
http://trouble.iotashan.com/jokes/stupid-lawsuits.cfm
Why did you not tell us before. You want to fight this case for 'stupid reasons'.
Sorry was pulling your leg.. :D
But I did have valid reasons. We want to know more than 'Yes it is possible/No it is not possible' from legal experts.
2011 tattoo Styles dog hairstyles. dog dog hairstyle. hairstyles for dogs.
Vikul
08-12 04:01 PM
Have not been active in IV cuz of work load but have been following the IV events very closely . As luck wld have it I am in town this weekend. Anything I can do help out:
1) Printing out flyer colored/(b/w).
2) I can take a video of the event if u don;t get someone professional.
3) Call other IV members.
4) Anything else .. no mater how trivial it is.
Hope this helps
Vikul
1) Printing out flyer colored/(b/w).
2) I can take a video of the event if u don;t get someone professional.
3) Call other IV members.
4) Anything else .. no mater how trivial it is.
Hope this helps
Vikul
more...
chinta_ramesh
08-29 11:45 AM
They have to do this ...no other option I guess. They are not build to take this much load !!!
guropovi
11-08 09:23 PM
We already sent letter to previous precident like this. But no improvement. Everyone is deaf. No one hear our screams. Waste of time and energy. Any how best of luck.
more...
go_gc_way
09-13 09:07 PM
It is raining now. After seeing the visa bulletin, it depresses my mind terribly in this gloomy weather.....
Two month is not just good enough and it is raining.
Yes it is very sad to wait so many years in the Que. One can always draw comparisions and down play our situation but fact is this indeed a strange situation.
Such a portability to shift employer is indeed very much required. For example to be able to go to another employer when your I-140 is approved which is immigrant petition.
This year, it self, we need to ask and get atleast the minimum done. Such as recap of unused visas & ability to apply for 485 while numbers are retrogressed.
Two month is not just good enough and it is raining.
Yes it is very sad to wait so many years in the Que. One can always draw comparisions and down play our situation but fact is this indeed a strange situation.
Such a portability to shift employer is indeed very much required. For example to be able to go to another employer when your I-140 is approved which is immigrant petition.
This year, it self, we need to ask and get atleast the minimum done. Such as recap of unused visas & ability to apply for 485 while numbers are retrogressed.
2010 pictures My dog hairstyle dog
roseball
10-01 04:49 PM
Thank you all for the useful information. Today I had a consultation with one of the senior attorneys from Muxxxx law firm. She says that cross changeability is applicable to do so. The same is mentioned by the senior and other members in the thread.
In accordance to my actual question, lawyer told me 2 options.
option #1: apply EB2 with the current employer for the future job (by promoting or similar job role change). But in this case, risk is there, high possible audit expectation, spending money and time. Audit could take more than 1 year.
option #2: change to the new employer and as per the job requirement do the EB2. This is smooth sailing. Audit expectation is less.
I'm not sure still what is the best option to go with. I really appreciate your suggestions and comments. Please help me to find some clear path.
Thank you so much
Arun
If you have a choice, I would root for Option#2 which is more straightforward with no grey areas. I have been through this process and sharing my views based on my personal experience. I worked for my original GC sponsoring employer for 8.5 yrs. It was a tough decision to quit but I had no choice. That was the only way I could get my GC. I changed jobs in July 2009 and the new employer filed my Eb-2 PERM end of March 2010. Received PERM approval mid August 2010 and employer filed EB-2 I-140 under premium processing end of August 2010 with a request to port my EB-3 Nov 2003 PD. In a week my I-140/I-485 were concurrently approved (Sep 3rd, 2010). I joined my previous employer in Jan 2001 after completion of my MS and my current employer is the second company I worked for so far. Both companies are large corporations in the field of mobile communications r&d.
I have seen others starting a new process within the same company as well. My old company wanted to restart another process in EB-2 but they could not start it as they continuously had lay-offs in my line of business. So I had to quit my job and join another company. I think if your company is large with diversified business areas, you have a better chance of getting through without an audit. I believe its tough to go through Option#1 if you work for a consulting company. End of the day, you should decide on an option which best suits your personal situation (type of company, your field, qualifications). Good luck.
In accordance to my actual question, lawyer told me 2 options.
option #1: apply EB2 with the current employer for the future job (by promoting or similar job role change). But in this case, risk is there, high possible audit expectation, spending money and time. Audit could take more than 1 year.
option #2: change to the new employer and as per the job requirement do the EB2. This is smooth sailing. Audit expectation is less.
I'm not sure still what is the best option to go with. I really appreciate your suggestions and comments. Please help me to find some clear path.
Thank you so much
Arun
If you have a choice, I would root for Option#2 which is more straightforward with no grey areas. I have been through this process and sharing my views based on my personal experience. I worked for my original GC sponsoring employer for 8.5 yrs. It was a tough decision to quit but I had no choice. That was the only way I could get my GC. I changed jobs in July 2009 and the new employer filed my Eb-2 PERM end of March 2010. Received PERM approval mid August 2010 and employer filed EB-2 I-140 under premium processing end of August 2010 with a request to port my EB-3 Nov 2003 PD. In a week my I-140/I-485 were concurrently approved (Sep 3rd, 2010). I joined my previous employer in Jan 2001 after completion of my MS and my current employer is the second company I worked for so far. Both companies are large corporations in the field of mobile communications r&d.
I have seen others starting a new process within the same company as well. My old company wanted to restart another process in EB-2 but they could not start it as they continuously had lay-offs in my line of business. So I had to quit my job and join another company. I think if your company is large with diversified business areas, you have a better chance of getting through without an audit. I believe its tough to go through Option#1 if you work for a consulting company. End of the day, you should decide on an option which best suits your personal situation (type of company, your field, qualifications). Good luck.
more...
deardar
10-29 08:46 AM
how did it go ?
Eager to know.
Sorry, I wasn't able to make it
Eager to know.
Sorry, I wasn't able to make it
hair Pulmenarian dog hairstyle
chanduv23
12-03 01:38 PM
I think all those things were OK when economy was good. Now the table has turned. It gives them more justifying reason to object on self-employment. My opinion.
Agreed. But in adherence with rules, USCIS may ask for evidence in interview such as paystubs, W2 just to prove that the self employment is legitimate.
We have been seeing RFEs for AR11 address changes requesting people to send an updated employer letter - additional questions during AOS interviews .... The only time we don't see all this is when USCIS has not used up its quota and DOS moves bulletin well ahead forcing USCIS to pick low hanging fruits - and that is the time people get lucky.
Agreed. But in adherence with rules, USCIS may ask for evidence in interview such as paystubs, W2 just to prove that the self employment is legitimate.
We have been seeing RFEs for AR11 address changes requesting people to send an updated employer letter - additional questions during AOS interviews .... The only time we don't see all this is when USCIS has not used up its quota and DOS moves bulletin well ahead forcing USCIS to pick low hanging fruits - and that is the time people get lucky.
more...
FUNTIMES
08-26 12:29 PM
smahwal,
Looks like you are in good shape to get approved soon. Did you do anything specific to resolve the situation like opening an SR, infopass etc.
I have been noticing soft LUDs on my EAD and 485. The EAD was issued about 2 months ago and I have had 2 soft luds on that and on the 485 in the last week.
Any ideas on what that means?
Looks like you are in good shape to get approved soon. Did you do anything specific to resolve the situation like opening an SR, infopass etc.
I have been noticing soft LUDs on my EAD and 485. The EAD was issued about 2 months ago and I have had 2 soft luds on that and on the 485 in the last week.
Any ideas on what that means?
hot cute HairStyle
chanduv23
03-19 08:12 PM
TCS employees give into it. When people know the implications and issues with the company why join such companies?
I have interacted with employees from Infosys, TCS, Satyam, Wipro .... all Indian companies ... many have issues, low pay, long work hours, immobility. Once again this proves that Indians (as we are) give into it. We do have a mindset of "adjusting to the situation" and think "getting exploited" is a part of life.
The way these companies do business is also not great. They give client free programmers and attract clients for low billing rates and lowe rates. They provide 1 consultant free for every 4 consultants. What a life these people have?????? Where is growth and where is professionalism?????
Before we actually blame the companies, the employees must educate themsleves and their co workers. A lot of people I know at TCS, when they left the company, they used to carry letterheads with them and get reference letter from a friend as company won't give.
Dear friends, please educate your co workers, and friends working in these companies, ask them to be aware of their rights.
I have interacted with employees from Infosys, TCS, Satyam, Wipro .... all Indian companies ... many have issues, low pay, long work hours, immobility. Once again this proves that Indians (as we are) give into it. We do have a mindset of "adjusting to the situation" and think "getting exploited" is a part of life.
The way these companies do business is also not great. They give client free programmers and attract clients for low billing rates and lowe rates. They provide 1 consultant free for every 4 consultants. What a life these people have?????? Where is growth and where is professionalism?????
Before we actually blame the companies, the employees must educate themsleves and their co workers. A lot of people I know at TCS, when they left the company, they used to carry letterheads with them and get reference letter from a friend as company won't give.
Dear friends, please educate your co workers, and friends working in these companies, ask them to be aware of their rights.
more...
house images My dog hairstyle dog
rangaswamy
08-06 08:58 AM
Yes, you are rite. As per my knowledge, (gathered from asking lawyers & INS customer service), H1 does become invalid once you enter on AP.
My lawyers categorically told me that entering on ap does not invalidate your H1B. Using Ead will invalidate your h1.
You can enter on ap and successfully renew your h1 thereafter. There are people who have done this.
While i know this information is good, you should check with your lawyer to avoid any complications.
My lawyers categorically told me that entering on ap does not invalidate your H1B. Using Ead will invalidate your h1.
You can enter on ap and successfully renew your h1 thereafter. There are people who have done this.
While i know this information is good, you should check with your lawyer to avoid any complications.
tattoo to any dog#39;s hairstyle.
chanduv23
03-05 01:42 PM
If this is true then I am sure not many people will be having pay slips for the all H1B period. I have been on H1 from past 4-5 years. I did not keep all pay slips with me. I only had payslips for beginning and ending of each company I worked for. If I have to carry all pay slips I basically take them in Check-in baggage and need a stroller to take them into the consulate. More paperwork mean more difficult for both non-immigrants and the consulate to prepare or to review them. Thank god I got my visa stamped early last month and it stays that way until 2011. Good luck for others.
All paystubs is difficult - I agree. It is better if they ask for w2 from previous years and paystubs for current year - makes more sense
All paystubs is difficult - I agree. It is better if they ask for w2 from previous years and paystubs for current year - makes more sense
more...
pictures dog haircuts
neoneo
09-28 01:52 AM
I've heard at least two July 2nd cases who have already got their AP. So, hang in there .
dresses Cute Hairstyles For Dogs
EndlessWait
12-21 04:02 PM
as per the ONET code , if the job description is exactly the same..does USCIS care about the title..I looked up the responsibilities of "Programmer Analyst" vs "Software Engineer"..they both seem to be different as per ONET..but in reality they both could share the same job description..what do u guys think?
oh well.. first it was Labor, then I-140, then 485.. ead,ap etc. etc..and now AC21... how many times do we have to prove and wait with USCIS..
:(
oh well.. first it was Labor, then I-140, then 485.. ead,ap etc. etc..and now AC21... how many times do we have to prove and wait with USCIS..
:(
more...
makeup dog hairstyle. jenny mcarthy
eb3_nepa
03-22 03:30 PM
Not true. Diversity visa lottery is exactly for that... getting diversity. EB visas are for Employment based immigration. If India and China do a good job in training people then their population should not be penalized for that. This is like saying if the government does not interfere, all the jobs will go to the whites, so no company can hire more than 20% from any ethnic class...
I kinda agree with this statement. Employment based visas are not made to promote diversity. Besides if other coutries except India & China have the qualified people they will still get their GCs, just that everyone will have to wait in ONE common queue based SOLELY on date of application.
All the views expressed here are true actually, both for and against the argument.
Yes, the lawsuit is an extreme idea, but at the same time educating the law-makers about the per-country quota is not a bad start.
My 2 cents on this is, that some of the law-makers already know abt the per-country limit and unless there are some undercurrents flowing that we dont know of, i see no harm in amoljak's point of view.
I kinda agree with this statement. Employment based visas are not made to promote diversity. Besides if other coutries except India & China have the qualified people they will still get their GCs, just that everyone will have to wait in ONE common queue based SOLELY on date of application.
All the views expressed here are true actually, both for and against the argument.
Yes, the lawsuit is an extreme idea, but at the same time educating the law-makers about the per-country quota is not a bad start.
My 2 cents on this is, that some of the law-makers already know abt the per-country limit and unless there are some undercurrents flowing that we dont know of, i see no harm in amoljak's point of view.
girlfriend Strong like Ox, smart like
blacktongue
04-26 12:11 PM
Since mavrick PlainSpeak is here...I know where this thread will lead to...so bye.
Mav PSpeak approch divide conquer EB2 EB3 :)
She cares none of IV. Saw thread killing advocacy contributions. She herself no contribute. Frustrated sole.
Mav PSpeak approch divide conquer EB2 EB3 :)
She cares none of IV. Saw thread killing advocacy contributions. She herself no contribute. Frustrated sole.
hairstyles love their little dogs!
BharatPremi
11-07 11:35 AM
There is a saying that Mangoes don't drop off the tree by reciting Mantras. [/B]
And problem is that mangoes are banned to be imported from Asia ... You should have written "Apples" in place of "mangoes"... You scared me:D
And problem is that mangoes are banned to be imported from Asia ... You should have written "Apples" in place of "mangoes"... You scared me:D
goel_ar
12-02 03:56 PM
UN will respond - why don't you go back to your home country , your country of citizenship?
Your 'Human Rights' are not violated by GC wait. It is the law you were aware but didn't anticipate that it is that long a wait.
This guys want maximum aspirint EB immigrants ouf of the country and take Fresh H1's to loot them.. that is the only reason for the pursuit... Really Frustrating, I share the same experience as yourself. Spuse cannot work/H1 extension delayes RFE/cannot stamp H1 to stamp inside US.. This is really treating us like slaves. We should complain to UN for Human Rights.
Your 'Human Rights' are not violated by GC wait. It is the law you were aware but didn't anticipate that it is that long a wait.
This guys want maximum aspirint EB immigrants ouf of the country and take Fresh H1's to loot them.. that is the only reason for the pursuit... Really Frustrating, I share the same experience as yourself. Spuse cannot work/H1 extension delayes RFE/cannot stamp H1 to stamp inside US.. This is really treating us like slaves. We should complain to UN for Human Rights.
gc_kaavaali
09-08 03:34 PM
today My AP renewal application had status change. Status has below details; Does it means it is approved?
Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.
On September 8, 2008 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service.
Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.
On September 8, 2008 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service.
No comments:
Post a Comment