diptam
06-11 06:54 PM
That's what i'm trying to figure out. Won't it be a headache for the lawyers then how they will defend themselves ? Its not my/our Job to go after them and ask them to follow up for USCIS errors - Isn't it ?
I mean in no way they should penalize me - its an issue between lawyer and USCIS. We are not supposed to know every law just because we're immigrant.
I didn't follow what you mean by "mass screening" - whom that affects generally ?
A good lawyer always follows rule laid by USCIS. Every officer is not expert in rules and regulations.
Consequences may be RFE and then one need to prove that it was not his/her mistake. And then USCIS will start doing mass screening (in fact this is happening with clients of couple of lawyers - we have some of the threads for it).
I mean in no way they should penalize me - its an issue between lawyer and USCIS. We are not supposed to know every law just because we're immigrant.
I didn't follow what you mean by "mass screening" - whom that affects generally ?
A good lawyer always follows rule laid by USCIS. Every officer is not expert in rules and regulations.
Consequences may be RFE and then one need to prove that it was not his/her mistake. And then USCIS will start doing mass screening (in fact this is happening with clients of couple of lawyers - we have some of the threads for it).
wallpaper 1 nuclear power plant and the
pappu
06-16 05:34 PM
sent to my attorney Dehai Tao.
Thank you.
Pls request your attorneys to sign up for this Free publicity feature for them on IV.
Thank you.
Pls request your attorneys to sign up for this Free publicity feature for them on IV.
brb2
05-23 08:43 AM
This article is depressing, but this could very well be the outcome and the house speaker has proven in the past to do what he says he will do. I would not be surprised if Diane Fienstein who is continuosly pushing the illegal immigrant issue beyond what even moderate republicans can accept will be a sure way to get the whole bill gutted in the senate. Read the article in Washington times for yourself.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/22/AR2006052201516.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/22/AR2006052201516.html
2011 nuclear power plant.
shree19772000
02-03 05:18 PM
So here are my concluding remarks on this topic based on logic life's answers...
Short sale and foreclosures should be no different from buying a regular property, downpayment wise and loan wise.
But it could take longer to close and you may have to spend some money upfront for inspection which you may loose if the bank does not approve.
Do foreclosures have to be approved by bank too? I know the short sales have to be.
Short sale and foreclosures should be no different from buying a regular property, downpayment wise and loan wise.
But it could take longer to close and you may have to spend some money upfront for inspection which you may loose if the bank does not approve.
Do foreclosures have to be approved by bank too? I know the short sales have to be.
more...
JunRN
12-29 04:56 PM
Regarding AC21, we make our own decision as each of us has different circumstances.
Some are already contented with the current employer (petitioner) and don't want to join another company. They do not need AC21.
Some are not really contented with the current employer (petitioner), but don't want to take the risk of using AC21. Let's respect their decision.
Some are not contented with the current employer (petitioner), so they invoked AC21. Let's respect their decision.
The thing is, whatever we do, let's weigh the risk against gain. It's called calculated risk.
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL!!!
Some are already contented with the current employer (petitioner) and don't want to join another company. They do not need AC21.
Some are not really contented with the current employer (petitioner), but don't want to take the risk of using AC21. Let's respect their decision.
Some are not contented with the current employer (petitioner), so they invoked AC21. Let's respect their decision.
The thing is, whatever we do, let's weigh the risk against gain. It's called calculated risk.
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL!!!
purgan
04-13 02:23 PM
logiclife, to answerr your question, Sen Lott was a co-sponsor of last years SKIL bill as well.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02691:@@@P
However, I wonder why Sen Enzi is not a cosponsor this time?
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02691:@@@P
However, I wonder why Sen Enzi is not a cosponsor this time?
more...
minimalist
06-21 11:02 AM
Answer is obvious. Tell your "friend of friend" ;) never to lie on immigration forms.
I don't get his case any way. How is going to cliam back pay if he never worked for this employer?
He researched a lot of forums and consulted a few contingency lawyers and gathered correctly that Employer is ultimately responsible for Employee.
However there is a wrinkle to his situation.He stayed with friends/relatives. Employer is not notified. I am not sure if the lawyers he spoke to understand this or not.
The only possible way to make a case out of it is by saying that the employer has been notified.
He is already in trouble. I think he may get into bigger trouble by misrepresenting. As he is desperate he may not be thinking it thoroughly. May be I am over thinking it but just wanted to see what others think.
I noticed your italics. If you mean to say it is probaly classic my problem beng stated as friend's problem, I am here since 2001 and am using EAD for past 1.5 years.
I am hoping desi3993 or some one who speak very authoritatively on similar issues would respond.
I don't get his case any way. How is going to cliam back pay if he never worked for this employer?
He researched a lot of forums and consulted a few contingency lawyers and gathered correctly that Employer is ultimately responsible for Employee.
However there is a wrinkle to his situation.He stayed with friends/relatives. Employer is not notified. I am not sure if the lawyers he spoke to understand this or not.
The only possible way to make a case out of it is by saying that the employer has been notified.
He is already in trouble. I think he may get into bigger trouble by misrepresenting. As he is desperate he may not be thinking it thoroughly. May be I am over thinking it but just wanted to see what others think.
I noticed your italics. If you mean to say it is probaly classic my problem beng stated as friend's problem, I am here since 2001 and am using EAD for past 1.5 years.
I am hoping desi3993 or some one who speak very authoritatively on similar issues would respond.
2010 Fukushima nuclear power
skongara
05-07 12:23 PM
I am just worried about the fact that i am not with the same employer who file my 140 petetion.But still i wanna join back him. I had to leave him because of my h1b extension problems.But i am very much happy with him and wanna get back to him. Anyone been in this situation.
more...
hariswaminathan
02-02 01:24 PM
Ah that is a new process i believe. Didnt have to do that earlier (2001).
hair Applicability of Fukushima
whiteStallion
05-14 04:38 PM
This may be a digression, but I have a 3 years Diploma and 11 years experience.
The job I'm doing is advertised as minimum Masters requirement....exact wordings :
"Will accept a Bachelors/equivalent and 5 years of progressively
responsible experience in lieu of a Masters/equivalent and 3 years of
experience. Will also accept 7 years experience in lieu of an
MS/equiv.+3/BS/equiv.+5"
I qualify against the 7 years experience qualification...applied for my PERM recently.. My questions are
1. Do I qualify for a EB2 or a EB3 ?
2. As mentioned in this thread, even if I'm through with the PERM, can my I140 get jeopardised due to this qualification mix-n-match in future ?
3. If so, is there a safer way of dealing with it ?
Appreciate your inputs!
The job I'm doing is advertised as minimum Masters requirement....exact wordings :
"Will accept a Bachelors/equivalent and 5 years of progressively
responsible experience in lieu of a Masters/equivalent and 3 years of
experience. Will also accept 7 years experience in lieu of an
MS/equiv.+3/BS/equiv.+5"
I qualify against the 7 years experience qualification...applied for my PERM recently.. My questions are
1. Do I qualify for a EB2 or a EB3 ?
2. As mentioned in this thread, even if I'm through with the PERM, can my I140 get jeopardised due to this qualification mix-n-match in future ?
3. If so, is there a safer way of dealing with it ?
Appreciate your inputs!
more...
pcs
01-13 08:29 AM
Congrats !!!!
More often than not 12 years take all the fun away...
By the way, please do not forget IV & continue to spread the good word about IV
More often than not 12 years take all the fun away...
By the way, please do not forget IV & continue to spread the good word about IV
hot Fukushima nuclear power plant
sledge_hammer
02-18 02:18 PM
She hadn't mentioned that she did not report to work before I had posted my comment.
Now that we know she did not report to work, yes, the employer is off the hook. The onus though is now on the employee to maintain her status because she has an I-94 attached to her H-1b approval.
It is not always employer is 'abusing' the system, sometimes 'employees' too directly or indirectly. Honestly, gopudeep will not report this to DOL or USCIS. BTW, employer will not be in trouble because gopudeep did not report to work and the employer can get off the hook easily.
Now that we know she did not report to work, yes, the employer is off the hook. The onus though is now on the employee to maintain her status because she has an I-94 attached to her H-1b approval.
It is not always employer is 'abusing' the system, sometimes 'employees' too directly or indirectly. Honestly, gopudeep will not report this to DOL or USCIS. BTW, employer will not be in trouble because gopudeep did not report to work and the employer can get off the hook easily.
more...
house Fukushima nuclear power
go_guy123
10-08 11:08 AM
He is a lawyer not a politician.
Does Hispanic caucus help approve his client applications?
I do not see any big deal in saying this.
Guess what....I am proven correct...
What i said that Ron Gotcher knows that EB reform is held hostage by CHC.
What a coincidence...I had read this post long back but didn't remember the author...actually it was written by
Ron Gotcher himself admitting that Hispanic caucus was holding up EB reform.
Its time to pull the teeth of the CHC - Immigration Information Discussion Forum (http://immigration-information.com/forums/blogs/ron-gotcher/9-its-time-to-pull-the-teeth-of-the-chc.html)
You want another truth:
Democratic party as well as Obama knows that if they dare pass amnesty (CIR)....independent and conservative (GOP voters) will throw them into the dungeon of political irrelevance. Democratic party will be politically finished..out of majority in Senate and Congress.
Does Hispanic caucus help approve his client applications?
I do not see any big deal in saying this.
Guess what....I am proven correct...
What i said that Ron Gotcher knows that EB reform is held hostage by CHC.
What a coincidence...I had read this post long back but didn't remember the author...actually it was written by
Ron Gotcher himself admitting that Hispanic caucus was holding up EB reform.
Its time to pull the teeth of the CHC - Immigration Information Discussion Forum (http://immigration-information.com/forums/blogs/ron-gotcher/9-its-time-to-pull-the-teeth-of-the-chc.html)
You want another truth:
Democratic party as well as Obama knows that if they dare pass amnesty (CIR)....independent and conservative (GOP voters) will throw them into the dungeon of political irrelevance. Democratic party will be politically finished..out of majority in Senate and Congress.
tattoo ichi Nuclear Power Plant
alapkd
09-14 01:16 AM
such admin posers should be banned but why are u posting such political opinions anyways this is not a forum to discuss politics it is to discuss immigration policy issues and problems.
even if u remain anonymous your comments will be posted on a public forum which is created for a certain purpose and you might undermine its effort.
i think it is time to recognize that being such a small minority with above average economic status every single of us is representing the whole community. both parties agree on immigration reform which will help us. the only major opposition to our cause is from few groups posing to represent american technology professionals. whether ur ideaology is liberal or conservative is of no importance to immigration matters.
i see lot of posts of all kinds even for ICICI bank!! but political comments are a PR nightmare.
IV can put a disclaimer that whatever is posted in forums is not its own opinion but ur doing a damage to IV check out opinions of dailykos and other liberal blogs they are not taken kindly by conservative media. go discuss politics on politics blogs.
as far as guys giving red dots i think they are not being sincere about their own actions.
even if u remain anonymous your comments will be posted on a public forum which is created for a certain purpose and you might undermine its effort.
i think it is time to recognize that being such a small minority with above average economic status every single of us is representing the whole community. both parties agree on immigration reform which will help us. the only major opposition to our cause is from few groups posing to represent american technology professionals. whether ur ideaology is liberal or conservative is of no importance to immigration matters.
i see lot of posts of all kinds even for ICICI bank!! but political comments are a PR nightmare.
IV can put a disclaimer that whatever is posted in forums is not its own opinion but ur doing a damage to IV check out opinions of dailykos and other liberal blogs they are not taken kindly by conservative media. go discuss politics on politics blogs.
as far as guys giving red dots i think they are not being sincere about their own actions.
more...
pictures Fukushima Dai Ichi Power Plant
RNGC
02-21 04:01 PM
Why not have dedicated paid IV attorney instead of volunteer attorney who advises the members on issues. IV members could chip in to pay for the attorney(s) for this purpose. May be have one attorney for each region of west central and east. I could chip in too for this purpose.
This is what I suggested here
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=17132
We need a IV lawyer network with fixed rates ( like prepaid taxi) for each tasks.
This is what I suggested here
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=17132
We need a IV lawyer network with fixed rates ( like prepaid taxi) for each tasks.
dresses Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear
hopefulgc
08-29 10:47 AM
For the love of God.....we have all been watching here that this was never posted on Aug 15th.
what is next ..daylight robbery?
wait that is already going on!
USCIS should outsource their operations to the Indian Government System. I bet there would be improvements nevertheless :D:D:D
am i reading it right but they moved the dates to June 18, 2008 !! for TSC..also it says posted aug 15th...!!!!
what is next ..daylight robbery?
wait that is already going on!
USCIS should outsource their operations to the Indian Government System. I bet there would be improvements nevertheless :D:D:D
am i reading it right but they moved the dates to June 18, 2008 !! for TSC..also it says posted aug 15th...!!!!
more...
makeup fukushima, nuclear,
Saralayar
03-18 10:18 AM
Hi All,
I have received the following email from CRIS stating that my wife's I485 was issued an RFE. I am new to this forum and tried to search but couldn't find it. Sorry if I am duplicating this.
================================================== ====
*** DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL ***
The last processing action taken on your case
Receipt Number: LINXXXXXXXXXX
Application Type: I485 , APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: Request for Additional Evidence Sent
On March 17, 2009, we mailed a notice requesting additional evidence or information in this case I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS. Please follow the instructions on the notice to submit the requested information. This case will be in suspense until we receive the evidence or the opportunity to submit it expires. Once we receive the requested evidence or information and make a decision on the case, you will be notified by mail. If you move while this case is pending, call 1-800-375-5283 to update your address.
If you have questions or concerns about your application or the case status results listed above, or if you have not received a decision from USCIS within the current processing time listed*, please contact USCIS Customer Service at (800) 375-5283.
*Current processing times can be found on the USCIS website at www.uscis.gov (http://www.uscis.gov) under Case Status and Processing Dates.
*** Please do not respond to this e-mail message.
Sincerely,
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
================================================== ====
My details:
Initially came on F1 and then H1B and staying on H1 till to date.
PD May 2006 PERM Regular process
I140 approved on August 2007 Regular Process
I485 applied on July 2007 with receipt date on August 2007 for both me and my wife.
My I140 did received RFE and employer replied promptly with proper tax documents and got approved in a week after USCIS received documents.
I485 applied on July 2007 for both me and my wife along with EAD only but not AP for the first time. Applied for EAD and AP second time and received both without any problems.
I have used AC21 (employer sent AC21 letter to USCIS after a month of joining) after almost a year of my I140 approval and joined my client company in the same position with same job duties and client company processed H1B for me and H4 for my wife and got successfully stamped in India during December 2008.
Wife working on EAD for a different employer at the same location.
My questions are
1. Did anyone in EB2 with 2006 PD notice this kind of behavior?
2. Where will my RFE be sent? to my new employer lawyer or to my old employer lawyer?
3. Can anyone guess what might be the reason for RFE?
I will update the post as soon as I know the exact details of the RFE but meanwhile wanted to know what might be the reason and wanted to ask expert opinions on how to proceed further.
Thanks in advance for the replies.
Please fill all the details of the dates of your profile so that others can answer well. This will also help IV for getting correct data for their Agenda.
I have received the following email from CRIS stating that my wife's I485 was issued an RFE. I am new to this forum and tried to search but couldn't find it. Sorry if I am duplicating this.
================================================== ====
*** DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL ***
The last processing action taken on your case
Receipt Number: LINXXXXXXXXXX
Application Type: I485 , APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: Request for Additional Evidence Sent
On March 17, 2009, we mailed a notice requesting additional evidence or information in this case I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS. Please follow the instructions on the notice to submit the requested information. This case will be in suspense until we receive the evidence or the opportunity to submit it expires. Once we receive the requested evidence or information and make a decision on the case, you will be notified by mail. If you move while this case is pending, call 1-800-375-5283 to update your address.
If you have questions or concerns about your application or the case status results listed above, or if you have not received a decision from USCIS within the current processing time listed*, please contact USCIS Customer Service at (800) 375-5283.
*Current processing times can be found on the USCIS website at www.uscis.gov (http://www.uscis.gov) under Case Status and Processing Dates.
*** Please do not respond to this e-mail message.
Sincerely,
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
================================================== ====
My details:
Initially came on F1 and then H1B and staying on H1 till to date.
PD May 2006 PERM Regular process
I140 approved on August 2007 Regular Process
I485 applied on July 2007 with receipt date on August 2007 for both me and my wife.
My I140 did received RFE and employer replied promptly with proper tax documents and got approved in a week after USCIS received documents.
I485 applied on July 2007 for both me and my wife along with EAD only but not AP for the first time. Applied for EAD and AP second time and received both without any problems.
I have used AC21 (employer sent AC21 letter to USCIS after a month of joining) after almost a year of my I140 approval and joined my client company in the same position with same job duties and client company processed H1B for me and H4 for my wife and got successfully stamped in India during December 2008.
Wife working on EAD for a different employer at the same location.
My questions are
1. Did anyone in EB2 with 2006 PD notice this kind of behavior?
2. Where will my RFE be sent? to my new employer lawyer or to my old employer lawyer?
3. Can anyone guess what might be the reason for RFE?
I will update the post as soon as I know the exact details of the RFE but meanwhile wanted to know what might be the reason and wanted to ask expert opinions on how to proceed further.
Thanks in advance for the replies.
Please fill all the details of the dates of your profile so that others can answer well. This will also help IV for getting correct data for their Agenda.
girlfriend Picture of Fukushima Nuclear
eb_retrogession
02-09 08:23 AM
The founder of Minutemen was on CSPAN this morning, and it appears that for his rally in DC - a whopping 100 people showed up !!!!!!!
ummmmm last I checked we had about 220 users viewing this website yesterday :-)
ummmmm last I checked we had about 220 users viewing this website yesterday :-)
hairstyles Fukushima nuclear power
jingi1234
10-06 05:42 PM
gc_buddy: What was your RFE about?
gc28262
06-05 03:43 PM
Hi,
My company applied my I140 May 16, 2007. It is still pending because of background check.
I140 should not be pending because of background check. I485 requires Background check.
I applied other I140 from different company with Jun 2008 PD got approved just in 4 months but this one got stuck because of background check. Some one please throw some light on this and suggest some action items for me so that I140 can approved sooner. My pending I140 has PD June 2004.
Please help me I am frustrated with long wait first 3 years for labor backlog now this new I140 's more than 2 years wait.
Thanks.
How do you know it is stuck in background check ?
Searching other forums, I have seen people stuck in background check for I-140 for upto 2 years.
I applied concurrently in july fiasco, but got my I-140 approved only yesterday.
My company applied my I140 May 16, 2007. It is still pending because of background check.
I140 should not be pending because of background check. I485 requires Background check.
I applied other I140 from different company with Jun 2008 PD got approved just in 4 months but this one got stuck because of background check. Some one please throw some light on this and suggest some action items for me so that I140 can approved sooner. My pending I140 has PD June 2004.
Please help me I am frustrated with long wait first 3 years for labor backlog now this new I140 's more than 2 years wait.
Thanks.
How do you know it is stuck in background check ?
Searching other forums, I have seen people stuck in background check for I-140 for upto 2 years.
I applied concurrently in july fiasco, but got my I-140 approved only yesterday.
fromnaija
03-04 06:10 PM
Only thing I did not like was Ballmer....
mbawa2574,
I think you should edit your post to remove the offensive comment. That's the "Honorable" thing to do.
mbawa2574,
I think you should edit your post to remove the offensive comment. That's the "Honorable" thing to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment