gcfriend65
04-03 08:59 AM
The lawmakers in the senate, I believe, have already left for the easter break. If, I am correct, last year, senate was already negotiating the bill, at this time and left for easter break without finalizing. However, this year the story is entirely different. Nobody have even INTRODUCED the bill yet in the senate. As, per Harry Reid, the senate is gonna discuss the bill, in the last two weeks of May. But the question, I have is within this six weeks, would it be possible for the senate to table a bill, negotiate it ine the senate judiciary committee and bring it to vote in the senate?
Senate version of CIR..when..what..by whom...time is running out..:rolleyes:
Senate version of CIR..when..what..by whom...time is running out..:rolleyes:
wallpaper London 2012 Olympic Torch
javadeveloper
07-19 11:18 AM
First time I came to US on 12/15/2000 and left US after 86 days that is on 3/10/2001 , during this period I didn't had any paystubs. I re-entered to US on 12/15/2002(this is my latest entry into US) , I don't have paystubs from 12/15/2002 to 2/14/2000(60 days) ,i have paystubs from 2/15/2003 to 4/15/2003 and again I don't have paystubs from 4/16/2003 to 9/30/2003(165 days).After that I have continuous paystubs.Does it mean that I was out of status for more than 180 days(i.e 60+165=225 or 86+60+165=311) or I was out of status for just 165 days .Maximum continious days that i stayed in US without paystubs are 165.One more thing my employer(s) didn't generated my payslips though I worked for some days.My Labor and I-140 are cleared and my I-485 reached CIS on 07/09/2007.If I am out of status for more than 180 days what are the options i have?
Thanks In Advance
JD
Thanks In Advance
JD
GCOP
05-22 01:57 PM
There is one more question regarding I-94 (Bottom Part of Approved H1B). I am planning to go to India and have approved Parole Document . When I re-enter US, I am going to use AP.
Now, question is- While leaving US, Should I turn in bottom part I-94 ,of I-797 (H1B Approval ) along with the Form I-94 (which is stapled with passport) which I filled in when I returned to US during last trip ?
To my opinion, all the I-94 should be turned in ( The one with approval and also the other one when I re-enetred US last time). But any other thoughts would be helpful.
Thanks.
Now, question is- While leaving US, Should I turn in bottom part I-94 ,of I-797 (H1B Approval ) along with the Form I-94 (which is stapled with passport) which I filled in when I returned to US during last trip ?
To my opinion, all the I-94 should be turned in ( The one with approval and also the other one when I re-enetred US last time). But any other thoughts would be helpful.
Thanks.
2011 London 2012 Olympic Torch by
mjdup
11-27 11:23 AM
If there is still a need for sponsor, I can do it. I'm in touch with the three core members in this regard and will also be attending this. thanks,
more...
gc_dreamer_2010
02-19 08:05 PM
Thanks desi!
gckidhamal
12-27 06:06 PM
USCIS accepted my applications and sent the checks for the fees back with comment "A non-required fee or biometrics fee has been received. The fee is being returned and your application/petition is being processed."
more...
forgerator
02-20 03:19 PM
ok so I mailed my joint tax return this afternoon + the w7 form. There were a couple of snags...
1) the entry date into the US. Since she's in Lahore and never visited the U.S (although going to obtain H4 soon) so I told her to fill n/a, n/a, n/a for the mm/dd/yyyy entry date field.
2) line 2 of w7 i.e. the Mailing Address. I had filled this one as my own US mailing address, although I did put her Lahore address in the foreign address line 3 field. I did this based on my interpretation of the W7 instructions.
Everything is now mailed and I'm praying they don't reject everything based on these minor details. If they do, what are my alternatives, so I can prepare myself in advance.
1) the entry date into the US. Since she's in Lahore and never visited the U.S (although going to obtain H4 soon) so I told her to fill n/a, n/a, n/a for the mm/dd/yyyy entry date field.
2) line 2 of w7 i.e. the Mailing Address. I had filled this one as my own US mailing address, although I did put her Lahore address in the foreign address line 3 field. I did this based on my interpretation of the W7 instructions.
Everything is now mailed and I'm praying they don't reject everything based on these minor details. If they do, what are my alternatives, so I can prepare myself in advance.
2010 London 2012 Olympic Torch by
lutherpraveen
07-16 04:17 PM
My lawyer said he filed July 2nd. (Mailed the application).
He has been my lawyer for the last 6 1/2 years, He is a pretty conservative person and wouldn't do anything harmful or risky.
so I trust his decisions.
He has been my lawyer for the last 6 1/2 years, He is a pretty conservative person and wouldn't do anything harmful or risky.
so I trust his decisions.
more...
buehler
07-19 11:17 PM
Don't be paranoid. You will be fine. I have send multiple checks to USCIS in the past the same way you wrote and never had any problem.
Only problem I had was with my first application in 2001 where I wrote "Deposit Only" in the back of check and it was sent back by INS saying that they can't accept endorsed checks.
Lately I have been sending all the USCIS fees using USPS money orders to be on the safe side as federal government money orders are sure way of secure payment.
But with a Postal Order, you loose the ability to track and can't know when the cheque is being encashed. Also if you send a cheque, from the back of the encashed cheque one will be able to find out the receipt number.
Only problem I had was with my first application in 2001 where I wrote "Deposit Only" in the back of check and it was sent back by INS saying that they can't accept endorsed checks.
Lately I have been sending all the USCIS fees using USPS money orders to be on the safe side as federal government money orders are sure way of secure payment.
But with a Postal Order, you loose the ability to track and can't know when the cheque is being encashed. Also if you send a cheque, from the back of the encashed cheque one will be able to find out the receipt number.
hair The 70-day Olympic Torch Relay
chanduv23
06-30 02:42 PM
chanduv23,
Pre-adjudication - as the term is used by USCIS - definitely means the file is reviewed by the AO (Adj. Officer) exactly as prescribed in their Standard Operating Procedure. All in all the only things done after pre-adjudication - when PD becomes current are - requesting a visa# from DoS, putting the approved stamp and signing and registering the PR status. That does not mean the officer may not again review the file based on updated data but the chances of that happening is low.
Those who have received RFE's and pre-adj. or know that they are pre-adj without RFE should be very happy knowing that their cases will be speedily approved once their PD is current.
How else do you think they issued thousands of GC's in June and July 2nd '07 -much higher than their usual levels of approving cases.
Thats right, unless something drastically changes - preadjudicated cases are ONLY waiting for visa number.
By drastic change - what I mean is - chances are that if use ac21 and employer revokes 140 then you may get an RFE for employment verification. I am not sure about this though, because we have not seen anything like that happen ater preadjudication.
Pre-adjudication - as the term is used by USCIS - definitely means the file is reviewed by the AO (Adj. Officer) exactly as prescribed in their Standard Operating Procedure. All in all the only things done after pre-adjudication - when PD becomes current are - requesting a visa# from DoS, putting the approved stamp and signing and registering the PR status. That does not mean the officer may not again review the file based on updated data but the chances of that happening is low.
Those who have received RFE's and pre-adj. or know that they are pre-adj without RFE should be very happy knowing that their cases will be speedily approved once their PD is current.
How else do you think they issued thousands of GC's in June and July 2nd '07 -much higher than their usual levels of approving cases.
Thats right, unless something drastically changes - preadjudicated cases are ONLY waiting for visa number.
By drastic change - what I mean is - chances are that if use ac21 and employer revokes 140 then you may get an RFE for employment verification. I am not sure about this though, because we have not seen anything like that happen ater preadjudication.
more...
sunnymit
03-08 03:09 PM
I don't see any calculator in the above link. My EB3 PD is June 2003. Anyone has a guess when EB3 would reach that date ?
I am planning on filing new EB2 perm application as I lost hope on EB3 (Employer agreed). Though priority date can be ported over, with the backlogs on PERM process, it looks like it might take anywhere from 6 to 18 months for this process. Do you think moving to EB2 is a wise move ?
Is there any chance that EB3 June 2003 PD will be current before the end of this year ? Any thoughts would probably help in making a decision from my side. Thanks.
Unless there is some immigration reform it will take a long time for EB3 to get to June 2003. If your employer is willing to file for EB2 and then port your EB3's priority date, I think you should go for it without a doubt in your mind. Even if somehow, by some magical calculations, your date for EB3 gets current before that, it doesn't harm your EB2 application in anyway. So there is nothing really to loose anyway...
I am planning on filing new EB2 perm application as I lost hope on EB3 (Employer agreed). Though priority date can be ported over, with the backlogs on PERM process, it looks like it might take anywhere from 6 to 18 months for this process. Do you think moving to EB2 is a wise move ?
Is there any chance that EB3 June 2003 PD will be current before the end of this year ? Any thoughts would probably help in making a decision from my side. Thanks.
Unless there is some immigration reform it will take a long time for EB3 to get to June 2003. If your employer is willing to file for EB2 and then port your EB3's priority date, I think you should go for it without a doubt in your mind. Even if somehow, by some magical calculations, your date for EB3 gets current before that, it doesn't harm your EB2 application in anyway. So there is nothing really to loose anyway...
hot The London 2012 Olympic torch
eb3retro
10-13 05:59 PM
Many would certainly contribute if IV core members can guarantee all members of this organization a sure success for SKILL BILL to be passed before end of this year.
:D
I am surprised to see this kind of message from someone other than our great kakaji..:D :D :D
:D
I am surprised to see this kind of message from someone other than our great kakaji..:D :D :D
more...
house Olympic torch. The London 2012
sac-r-ten
02-26 10:16 AM
Immigration212, sorry to hear that you are paying for your parents mistake.
Champu, i think there was not need to get caste,creed and nationality into this.
Champu, i think there was not need to get caste,creed and nationality into this.
tattoo Top of the 2012 Olympic torch
drnyinyithan
02-24 01:37 PM
Immigration Reform is the only hope for EB3...
No,you can not say that, because there is a quota for EB3 every year and they are clearing out the backlog, please do not kill the hope of EB3 people....:cool:
No,you can not say that, because there is a quota for EB3 every year and they are clearing out the backlog, please do not kill the hope of EB3 people....:cool:
more...
pictures London 2012 Olympic posters
WeShallOvercome
07-24 01:18 PM
Tina are you doing research in names..
Badluck---whenever try to do something, my luck stops me.
thats why life sucks.
Same thing has been happening to me for years. Then I decided to try and get some positive energy around me and hence picked this name...
Believe me or not, Things have really brightened up for me after I registered with this name :) ( July 17th reversal of visa bulletin update, July 18th, Got my I-140 approved without any RFE, my case had a lot of issues which could have resulted in a denial )
Badluck---whenever try to do something, my luck stops me.
thats why life sucks.
Same thing has been happening to me for years. Then I decided to try and get some positive energy around me and hence picked this name...
Believe me or not, Things have really brightened up for me after I registered with this name :) ( July 17th reversal of visa bulletin update, July 18th, Got my I-140 approved without any RFE, my case had a lot of issues which could have resulted in a denial )
dresses London 2012 Olympics torch
BharatPremi
10-15 08:28 PM
Wow!! Keep it up.
more...
makeup London 2012: Olympic torch
abq_gc
04-28 01:42 PM
Agreed this is a forum related to immigration.. but I thought maybe my fellow IVians, who are on the top of what they do, might be able to help me out here. I am in a bind, and I need to change my field of work as I have not found any work in my field from the last 3 months now.
If anyone can suggest any good SAP training centers which provide free training and accommodation along with job placement, I will appreciate it.
thanks a lot guys,
abq_gc
If anyone can suggest any good SAP training centers which provide free training and accommodation along with job placement, I will appreciate it.
thanks a lot guys,
abq_gc
girlfriend LONDON: The London 2012
maddipati1
08-31 12:11 PM
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/CISOMB_Annual_Report_2007.pdf
YES INDEED, VERY INFORMATIVE. THX
YES INDEED, VERY INFORMATIVE. THX
hairstyles The London 2012 Olympic Torch
lazycis
02-25 09:10 AM
Company lawyer submitted on 08/15/07 to USCIS as per Fedex Tracking. Since they filled in the last movement I think I got lately 485 receipt. I can see Notice date as 10/23/07 at top right side on I-797C (Case type I485 aplication to Register Permanent Resident or Adjust Status).
So I'm just waiting eargarly to complete 180 days from notice date and I think I dont need any original labour or any other document to use AC21?
Can you suggest any good lawyer to help me in taking care my GC process.
Thanks for your proactive follow up.
On your I-485 receipt there is "Date Received" field which is the date you should use to calculate 180 days. It does not matter when the receipt was issued.
So I'm just waiting eargarly to complete 180 days from notice date and I think I dont need any original labour or any other document to use AC21?
Can you suggest any good lawyer to help me in taking care my GC process.
Thanks for your proactive follow up.
On your I-485 receipt there is "Date Received" field which is the date you should use to calculate 180 days. It does not matter when the receipt was issued.
ronhira
10-08 12:11 PM
u got be either gotcher or his staff....
What i said that Ron Gotcher knows that EB reform is held hostage by CHC.
is this a highly complicated problem that we need the intelligence of immigration lawyer to figure this thing out .... although we all know the iq of immigration lawyers....
Democratic party as well as Obama knows that if they dare pass amnesty (CIR)....independent and conservative (GOP voters) will throw them into the dungeon of political irrelevance. Democratic party will be politically finished..out of majority in Senate and Congress.
is that so.... quinn pool released today says less than 1% of the people think immigration is an issue......
isn't it the other way around.... if immigration bill is passed..... and gop continues to opposes immigration.... it will annihilate gop from wining anything for next 50 years.... and so gop should support immigration....these are the words of karl rove..... so whom should we listen on this one....... rove or gotcher..... i smell new battle lines being drawn...... the next wwf tittle championship..... rove v/s gotcher
What i said that Ron Gotcher knows that EB reform is held hostage by CHC.
is this a highly complicated problem that we need the intelligence of immigration lawyer to figure this thing out .... although we all know the iq of immigration lawyers....
Democratic party as well as Obama knows that if they dare pass amnesty (CIR)....independent and conservative (GOP voters) will throw them into the dungeon of political irrelevance. Democratic party will be politically finished..out of majority in Senate and Congress.
is that so.... quinn pool released today says less than 1% of the people think immigration is an issue......
isn't it the other way around.... if immigration bill is passed..... and gop continues to opposes immigration.... it will annihilate gop from wining anything for next 50 years.... and so gop should support immigration....these are the words of karl rove..... so whom should we listen on this one....... rove or gotcher..... i smell new battle lines being drawn...... the next wwf tittle championship..... rove v/s gotcher
pappu
11-18 10:32 PM
It is also a great opportunity for local members to meet IV core members and kickstart the MA and NH chapter activities. Pls try to make it to the event.
No comments:
Post a Comment