wandmaker
10-01 02:49 PM
Even i did not expect them to respond so quickly. do I need to be concerned about the fact that they did not send me any notice for my finger prints?
Paper filing cases does not get finger printing notice
Paper filing cases does not get finger printing notice
wallpaper Shweta Tiwari Posters , Shweta
ghost
09-12 02:39 PM
Another "budding" democrat is the Afro American from Chicago, Mr. Obama. He is very hostile to legal immigration because he thinks skilled immigration has a disproportionately negative impact on blacks.
where did you read this?
where did you read this?
sunny1000
01-23 05:54 PM
Her I-130 was approved a couple years ago and we are going to attach a copy of that with the I-485 application.
Her humanitarian parole was approved in 8/2010, expired that month, and it was an I-94 with no other paperwork and with no stamp in the passport.
In that case, I think 10F from the intstructions applies in her case (just my opinion).
I had attached a PDF that talks about arriving aliens, in my previous message.
Her humanitarian parole was approved in 8/2010, expired that month, and it was an I-94 with no other paperwork and with no stamp in the passport.
In that case, I think 10F from the intstructions applies in her case (just my opinion).
I had attached a PDF that talks about arriving aliens, in my previous message.
2011 Hot Shweta Tiwari Pictures
mccartjt
02-15 05:36 PM
If you haven't an I-485 filed you can't get AC 21 portability/transfer, if it takes 2 months to get FOIA info on your employers I-140 for two months then you're looking @ 8 months before you get that going too.
If you are realistic, don't forget there's a recession/depression on out there so getting work isn't going to be the easiest of tasks is it? So how are you claiming the right to a new position/thus GC? Or have I missed something here? If you get caught trying to pull a fast move kiss coming to the USA good bye!
If you are realistic, don't forget there's a recession/depression on out there so getting work isn't going to be the easiest of tasks is it? So how are you claiming the right to a new position/thus GC? Or have I missed something here? If you get caught trying to pull a fast move kiss coming to the USA good bye!
more...
gc_on_demand
01-08 03:56 PM
Most people here now are so bored, vexed and annoyed with Visa Bulletin that they don't even want to think of it.
I had stopped thinking about it as for reason
1. It moves with the speed of a local train. You never know when it would reach destination.
2. Neither my predictions nor my hopes ever got it right.
3. GC will come when it had to come and there is no point in thinking about it.
In India I use to see these lines on lot's of calenders.
jab jab jo jo hona hota hai woh tab tab hota hai.
So, there is no point in waiting for VB.
I was checking processing time and VB everyday.. I dont remember when I checked Processing time... same for VB.. I dont have excitement this time.
Even I haven't file for 485 and waiting to file for.
I had stopped thinking about it as for reason
1. It moves with the speed of a local train. You never know when it would reach destination.
2. Neither my predictions nor my hopes ever got it right.
3. GC will come when it had to come and there is no point in thinking about it.
In India I use to see these lines on lot's of calenders.
jab jab jo jo hona hota hai woh tab tab hota hai.
So, there is no point in waiting for VB.
I was checking processing time and VB everyday.. I dont remember when I checked Processing time... same for VB.. I dont have excitement this time.
Even I haven't file for 485 and waiting to file for.
sbmallik
08-10 01:23 PM
My priority date is June 2006.
I was with consulting company till 06/2009 after which I joined the client (fortune 10) company as full time employee. I'm on EB3 category using my EAD.
When I was with consulting company before I left they filed for my EB2 labor which is now approved.
Here is my DILEMMA.
OPTION#1) I can join my previous employer. i.e. the consulting company for interfiling between EB3 and EB2 so in which case if I go for premium I140 processing I will be on EB2 within a month or so.
BUT I'll have to leave my current full time employment which is with a fortune 10 company and good pay, I'm not comfortable to leave this position AND I do NOT want to loose the opportunity of getting my GC as soon as possible as EB2 dates are so close to my priority date.
OPTION#2) Discard the approved EB2 labor that my previous employer (consulting company) have for me and ask my current employer (fortune 10)company start my EB2 PERM labor and premium I140 and then interfile. IN THIS CASE, it might take about an year for me to get on to EB2 category BUT by then I'll miss the EB2 train if the dates become current before I get on to EB2 category....
I appreciate your help and time.
If I were you I would choose option #2, however, please make sure that your employer is ready to file a new EB2 application for the current job.
I was with consulting company till 06/2009 after which I joined the client (fortune 10) company as full time employee. I'm on EB3 category using my EAD.
When I was with consulting company before I left they filed for my EB2 labor which is now approved.
Here is my DILEMMA.
OPTION#1) I can join my previous employer. i.e. the consulting company for interfiling between EB3 and EB2 so in which case if I go for premium I140 processing I will be on EB2 within a month or so.
BUT I'll have to leave my current full time employment which is with a fortune 10 company and good pay, I'm not comfortable to leave this position AND I do NOT want to loose the opportunity of getting my GC as soon as possible as EB2 dates are so close to my priority date.
OPTION#2) Discard the approved EB2 labor that my previous employer (consulting company) have for me and ask my current employer (fortune 10)company start my EB2 PERM labor and premium I140 and then interfile. IN THIS CASE, it might take about an year for me to get on to EB2 category BUT by then I'll miss the EB2 train if the dates become current before I get on to EB2 category....
I appreciate your help and time.
If I were you I would choose option #2, however, please make sure that your employer is ready to file a new EB2 application for the current job.
more...
saibaba
03-31 02:19 PM
Yes. Actually I'd like to know the answer to this query as well. From an Immigration perspective, what are the ramifications when 'Married and filing Jointly' versus 'Married and filing seperately'. I also have my I485 pending. Thanks in advance.
well...lemme open seperate thread as the present thread is into something else...
well...lemme open seperate thread as the present thread is into something else...
2010 Shweta Tiwari Wallpaper
pomogranate
11-21 06:37 PM
:crying:
more...
Rockford
07-16 12:37 PM
Hi,
The one who got approval from 2005 must be an EB1? Otherwise it is totally unfair to other persons waiting in queue for so long time. Can you please give the details as when did that person filed 485. Is it early July or before that?
It is EB2. See this :
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10178
The one who got approval from 2005 must be an EB1? Otherwise it is totally unfair to other persons waiting in queue for so long time. Can you please give the details as when did that person filed 485. Is it early July or before that?
It is EB2. See this :
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10178
hair 2011 Shweta Tiwari Wallpapers:
tejonidhi
10-02 01:47 PM
I am waiting on my spouse's EAD/AP approval. Applied on 8th July. My EAD/AP got approved last month (applied for myself and spouse on same day).
Can you please tell me what you mean by POJ method?
there is slight change in the sequence
Here is the sequence.
1) 1 800 375 5283
2) 1,2,2,6,1 receipt notice# 1,3,4
3) you will have to wait for 10 to 15 minutes and one of the officer will come online for you.
4) at least they will give you information about your case ( mine is sent to some storage and they had to issue an expedite request to get it processed again. I am july 2 filer with notice dat of sept 8,2007 3 infopass apointments, 1 SR). the officer has access to look at the file and can give you appropriate information( they are not like regular service agents who will read what you see on USCIS.gov).
5) as of now they told me that I will information from USCIS in 2 weeks.
Can you please tell me what you mean by POJ method?
there is slight change in the sequence
Here is the sequence.
1) 1 800 375 5283
2) 1,2,2,6,1 receipt notice# 1,3,4
3) you will have to wait for 10 to 15 minutes and one of the officer will come online for you.
4) at least they will give you information about your case ( mine is sent to some storage and they had to issue an expedite request to get it processed again. I am july 2 filer with notice dat of sept 8,2007 3 infopass apointments, 1 SR). the officer has access to look at the file and can give you appropriate information( they are not like regular service agents who will read what you see on USCIS.gov).
5) as of now they told me that I will information from USCIS in 2 weeks.
more...
Munna Bhai
08-28 08:57 AM
Party Over...Still Hang Over. Anyways who declared the party is over? I didnt hear anything from the host(USCIS) or his wife(DOS)? I dont know about you...I'm still going for a refill(waiting for september). :D
Host(USCIS) or his wife(DOS) have gone to sleep, they don't declare, they do what they want to.
If you as a guest still want to enjoy the party, feel free to stay. I have decided to enjoy my long weekend. The best way is to find "another party (BILL)".
IV rocks..
Host(USCIS) or his wife(DOS) have gone to sleep, they don't declare, they do what they want to.
If you as a guest still want to enjoy the party, feel free to stay. I have decided to enjoy my long weekend. The best way is to find "another party (BILL)".
IV rocks..
hot Shweta Tiwari : Wallpapers
meridiani.planum
07-20 01:39 PM
Can you clarify the difference between case scenario 3 and 4. It looks like there is no need of filing multiple 485 petition if one has already filed and pending.
There is way by which one can "Interfile" using the spouse approved I-140 as stated in scenario 4.
people did multiple filings for different reasons.. interfiling is easier if one application is already in the system, you have receipts, A# and all that.
However we had cases where PD became current for both spouses in the same month (like July last year) and there was no time to file one app, see how it goes, then based on PDs decide to interfile or not. Also in cases where both spouses had I-140 pending and some risk of denial in both, it made sense to file 2 485s, so even if one I-140 gets denied, there is still atleast one AOS set still pending.
USCIS has a memo about interfiling, and its a known, accepted form of doing things. There is no regulation about multiple 485s. USCIS in an AILA teleconf mentioned that they discourage applicants frmo having 2 485s pending. However since there is no real regulation or law in place preventing multiple filings aggressive lawyers go ahead with it (Rajiv Khanna is one). The very conservative lawyers (Murthy, Fragomen) steer clear to avoid any potential complication. At this point its hard to say who is right, but I dont know of any case that got into a big mess because of 2 filings (the worst I have heard is when EAD or AP comes its sometimes hard to tell which 485 they based it on, but if both remain pending thats also not an issue).
Interfiling across spouses (scenario 4) is also a big of a gray area. Many lawyers (including mine) say it can be done, some say it cant be done, others have taken different stances at different points in time (if you see their chatlogs etc over the course of last 3-4 years).
There is way by which one can "Interfile" using the spouse approved I-140 as stated in scenario 4.
people did multiple filings for different reasons.. interfiling is easier if one application is already in the system, you have receipts, A# and all that.
However we had cases where PD became current for both spouses in the same month (like July last year) and there was no time to file one app, see how it goes, then based on PDs decide to interfile or not. Also in cases where both spouses had I-140 pending and some risk of denial in both, it made sense to file 2 485s, so even if one I-140 gets denied, there is still atleast one AOS set still pending.
USCIS has a memo about interfiling, and its a known, accepted form of doing things. There is no regulation about multiple 485s. USCIS in an AILA teleconf mentioned that they discourage applicants frmo having 2 485s pending. However since there is no real regulation or law in place preventing multiple filings aggressive lawyers go ahead with it (Rajiv Khanna is one). The very conservative lawyers (Murthy, Fragomen) steer clear to avoid any potential complication. At this point its hard to say who is right, but I dont know of any case that got into a big mess because of 2 filings (the worst I have heard is when EAD or AP comes its sometimes hard to tell which 485 they based it on, but if both remain pending thats also not an issue).
Interfiling across spouses (scenario 4) is also a big of a gray area. Many lawyers (including mine) say it can be done, some say it cant be done, others have taken different stances at different points in time (if you see their chatlogs etc over the course of last 3-4 years).
more...
house Shweta Tiwari Wallpaper 1
casinoroyale
08-22 09:45 AM
Any more AP approvals from NSC? It looks like USCIS is thinking why approve the cases when most of the APs start expiring from October, may be they will flood :D with approvals in September and October.
tattoo Shweta Tiwari Photos .
copsmart
02-21 07:48 PM
Yeah, you should read it one more time.
Especially this line... "voluntarily departs from the employment in an hostile environment to get a new job, and the USCIS obtains an evidence, either before 180 days or after 180 days of filing of I-140 and I-485".
This has been known for a long time. Its says that alien who has filed I-140/I-485 should not vlountarily switch job before 180 days have passed. This has been known always...which is why July 2007 filers started invoking AC-21 after 6 months/1 year....
Especially this line... "voluntarily departs from the employment in an hostile environment to get a new job, and the USCIS obtains an evidence, either before 180 days or after 180 days of filing of I-140 and I-485".
This has been known for a long time. Its says that alien who has filed I-140/I-485 should not vlountarily switch job before 180 days have passed. This has been known always...which is why July 2007 filers started invoking AC-21 after 6 months/1 year....
more...
pictures Shweta Tiwari wallpaper
adhantari
08-03 09:44 AM
how much did you pay for LS?
dresses Shweta Tiwari Wallpaper 3
SGP
11-16 02:26 PM
What is the station and program .. any web links ??
You can listen to it online on Radio Dil best bollywood hindi music radio station (http://www.radiodil.com). Or from your phone by calling 400-418-5000.
You can listen to it online on Radio Dil best bollywood hindi music radio station (http://www.radiodil.com). Or from your phone by calling 400-418-5000.
more...
makeup Tiwari Hot Wallpapers,
pmamp
08-06 04:13 PM
It is certainly not out of their (NSC's) league to do something like that - work on the case w/o posting a LUD and approve them/send notices in batch.
I think it is possible to data mine the case status from USCIS site quite easily. Based on the case number decode it is possible to write a routine to go through all the cases in sequence and extract the information. I believe that is what ImmigrationWatch is doing. What is lacking there is the country of chargeability - which is not available on the case status display.
In any case I hope - IO at NSC wakes up from their hibernation and starts working. May be they are waiting for the flowers from IV members :)
Something tells me that NSC might be working on 485 cases like TSC with an exception of sending or updating the approval notices as and when they are completed.
Maybe they will send all the approval notices this weekend for the cases being worked on till now.
After seeing the Immigrationwatch on the number of approvals and cases touched at NSC(not sure how reliable this is)but , this might be the case.
Also, if you see the history of NSC on approval notices sent , this might make sense. Example did anyone observed this trend in EAD approvals from NSC? My Approval notice for EAD says that the Case is approved on 12/11/07, however the Card expiration date was valid from 12/05/2007 to 12/04/2008. A gap of 8 days between date sent and actual approval
Just being positive....Thats all...Hopefully True
I think it is possible to data mine the case status from USCIS site quite easily. Based on the case number decode it is possible to write a routine to go through all the cases in sequence and extract the information. I believe that is what ImmigrationWatch is doing. What is lacking there is the country of chargeability - which is not available on the case status display.
In any case I hope - IO at NSC wakes up from their hibernation and starts working. May be they are waiting for the flowers from IV members :)
Something tells me that NSC might be working on 485 cases like TSC with an exception of sending or updating the approval notices as and when they are completed.
Maybe they will send all the approval notices this weekend for the cases being worked on till now.
After seeing the Immigrationwatch on the number of approvals and cases touched at NSC(not sure how reliable this is)but , this might be the case.
Also, if you see the history of NSC on approval notices sent , this might make sense. Example did anyone observed this trend in EAD approvals from NSC? My Approval notice for EAD says that the Case is approved on 12/11/07, however the Card expiration date was valid from 12/05/2007 to 12/04/2008. A gap of 8 days between date sent and actual approval
Just being positive....Thats all...Hopefully True
girlfriend Shweta Tiwari wallpaper
GCNirvana007
03-15 10:52 AM
I am currently in Chennai on a business trip. I am narrating an incident which happend in front of my eyes yesterday.
One of my neighbour's car was parked in the street. A rash motorcycle guy slammed it in the rear. Totally his fault. Car owner question him for his reckless driving. He ran away cameback with 5 guys ( all political ). By this time, cops arrived as well. Those 5 guys uttered these words infront of the cops and everybody.
" Do you know who i am. I am in politics. I will wipe you all".
After he left, people asked cops why they were quiet. Cops said, they were scared for their lives
One of my neighbour's car was parked in the street. A rash motorcycle guy slammed it in the rear. Totally his fault. Car owner question him for his reckless driving. He ran away cameback with 5 guys ( all political ). By this time, cops arrived as well. Those 5 guys uttered these words infront of the cops and everybody.
" Do you know who i am. I am in politics. I will wipe you all".
After he left, people asked cops why they were quiet. Cops said, they were scared for their lives
hairstyles Shweta Tiwari Hot Photos,
username007
06-26 03:44 PM
I too have a simple question - Do we need to write set of checks for each applicant OR for all the applicants only one set of checks are needed?
Can it be a personal bank check?
Can it be a personal bank check?
brb2
09-12 03:25 PM
I watched the full judicial committee proceedings and the following CIR bill on Cspan. Obama introduced an amendment (can't recall the details now) at that time and it was related specifically related to the "affect" on low skilled American workers. After watching the whole drama I was determined I would never ever vote for democrats.
where did you read this?
where did you read this?
tikka
06-07 08:45 AM
I usually try not to clog up the threads but I would like to put on a record that this statement is a sweeping generalization. There are many people who are contributing/emailing/faxing/calling the senate offices but not posting about it, myself included. So, a few bad apples do not mean that 11,000 members have sipped tea and coffee.
You are right. There has been a lot more support to IV in the last few days/weeks.
If you or your friends do call/webfax/mail senaotors, can you please post online?
Somtimes it just encourages other members and they realize that calling a senator is almost as easy as sending a wefax!
Thank you again for your contribtutions.
You are right. There has been a lot more support to IV in the last few days/weeks.
If you or your friends do call/webfax/mail senaotors, can you please post online?
Somtimes it just encourages other members and they realize that calling a senator is almost as easy as sending a wefax!
Thank you again for your contribtutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment