pappu
04-16 11:15 AM
Thank you. We need more members meeting lawmakers.
wallpaper (A) Phloem fiber cells with
apb
12-21 05:46 PM
as long as your job duties are the same or similar it doesnt matter what title and salary it is..this is according to my lawyer....
Please search for postings by Logiclife on Aytes memo. The memo says that if the salary is "substantially" higher then the 485 could be rejected because it can possibly be concluded as not being in the same Job.
Please search for postings by Logiclife on Aytes memo. The memo says that if the salary is "substantially" higher then the 485 could be rejected because it can possibly be concluded as not being in the same Job.
lutherpraveen
07-16 04:17 PM
My lawyer said he filed July 2nd. (Mailed the application).
He has been my lawyer for the last 6 1/2 years, He is a pretty conservative person and wouldn't do anything harmful or risky.
so I trust his decisions.
He has been my lawyer for the last 6 1/2 years, He is a pretty conservative person and wouldn't do anything harmful or risky.
so I trust his decisions.
2011 Plant Cell Biology Structure
actaccord
01-31 08:46 AM
related to Employer-Employee relationship issue. Most of the time employees of consulting company are the one facing this issue. If work location is different from the company base address then question about the client and project raises, which most of the time turns out to be difficult case to prove employee-employer relationship and they end up with 221(g).
Companies needs take initiative and work with their lawyers to make sure employees are not affected during the trips (to home country), but very rarely company takes care of this without any issue pops up which is very sad.
221(g) is rampant in India nowadays for IT consulting companies.
ILW.COM - immigration news: H1B and H-4 Visa Applications in India Plagued by 221(g) Refusals: Part 1 (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2011,0127-murthy.shtm)
Companies needs take initiative and work with their lawyers to make sure employees are not affected during the trips (to home country), but very rarely company takes care of this without any issue pops up which is very sad.
221(g) is rampant in India nowadays for IT consulting companies.
ILW.COM - immigration news: H1B and H-4 Visa Applications in India Plagued by 221(g) Refusals: Part 1 (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2011,0127-murthy.shtm)
more...
ivorycard
07-24 06:39 PM
Would USCIS have a receipt date for NSC first and then another receipt date at TSC ???
Munna Bhai
10-19 01:15 PM
Please read the history of the post. He NEVER informed USCIS on AC21 and the GC got approved. In such a case, the only way he can prove his intent is to work for the petitioning employer is by working with him AFTER GC approval.
There's no question of AC21 after GC approval.
AC21 says that if 180 days is pending then you can switch the jobs and the next employer will employee you until you get GC. Once you get GC(even though you worked for next employer), then you need to stick with this new employer for another 6 months, no need to go back to old employer. That's the end.
There's no question of AC21 after GC approval.
AC21 says that if 180 days is pending then you can switch the jobs and the next employer will employee you until you get GC. Once you get GC(even though you worked for next employer), then you need to stick with this new employer for another 6 months, no need to go back to old employer. That's the end.
more...
satishku_2000
10-19 02:29 PM
Hi Guys,
I joined a fortune 500 company in April 2006 and my offer letter states that
"After one year of satisfactory or above performance, [Comapany Name] will make a determination about sponsorship for permanent residency".
The company made a technology change from Microsoft to Java and I am being told that since I do not have the skills for the new environment they will not sponsor my residency.
Is the company legally bound to sponsor my residency or am I better off looking for new opportunities.
Thanks a lot for your help.
In your case simple answer is NO.
I joined a fortune 500 company in April 2006 and my offer letter states that
"After one year of satisfactory or above performance, [Comapany Name] will make a determination about sponsorship for permanent residency".
The company made a technology change from Microsoft to Java and I am being told that since I do not have the skills for the new environment they will not sponsor my residency.
Is the company legally bound to sponsor my residency or am I better off looking for new opportunities.
Thanks a lot for your help.
In your case simple answer is NO.
2010 focus on plant cells where
ganguteli
06-25 04:52 PM
Army Recruiter's main job is to get you in the army by any means. .
Please clarify?
Also why can't they put all the promises on paper in writing. Without being put in writing people will suspect.
And what is the incentive for Army recruiter when he enlists people? Do they get special benefits or extra money per new candidate?
Please clarify?
Also why can't they put all the promises on paper in writing. Without being put in writing people will suspect.
And what is the incentive for Army recruiter when he enlists people? Do they get special benefits or extra money per new candidate?
more...
qasleuth
05-13 06:48 PM
Everytime I start to ask myself or my foreign workers colleagues these questions, the only answer we keep arriving upon is that the business lobby along with foreign business lobbies want cheap labor. Companies may choose to outsource it, but it is even more attractive to bring labor here where intellectual assets are more tightly monitored and schedules are more easily managed. Net result, win/win for the business and lose/lose for US citizens.
Im just saying....
that is your version of reality. You are gathering evidence to prove your assertions. All this anecdotal 'evidence' and you performing these field surveys tell you what you want your mind to listen. Maybe it is time to take up the issue to your company's HR. Why are your foreign worker colleagues telling you that they are cheap labor? and when they made that assertion, you took it lying down ?
The current economy has many IT professionals out of work. Yet, the visa workers remain. Students graduating in engineering in top US universities cannot get jobs. Why?
do you have a source which you can quote or is it the same mysterious anecdotal evidence ?
Im just saying....
that is your version of reality. You are gathering evidence to prove your assertions. All this anecdotal 'evidence' and you performing these field surveys tell you what you want your mind to listen. Maybe it is time to take up the issue to your company's HR. Why are your foreign worker colleagues telling you that they are cheap labor? and when they made that assertion, you took it lying down ?
The current economy has many IT professionals out of work. Yet, the visa workers remain. Students graduating in engineering in top US universities cannot get jobs. Why?
do you have a source which you can quote or is it the same mysterious anecdotal evidence ?
hair An Overview of Plant Cells
javadeveloper
08-07 07:38 PM
Considering the situation with EB3 priority dates, this may be a good idea of any EB3 who can potentially file EB2. (I know about the opponents of interfiling and I am not personally opposing or approving interfiling, this is just my honest personal opinion/advise for anyone and everyone stuck in EB3).
FYI: I am EB2 and was never EB3.
I wish all of us get our GC soon...
That's the spirit!!!Thanks for being honest ,I appreciate it.
FYI: I am EB2 and was never EB3.
I wish all of us get our GC soon...
That's the spirit!!!Thanks for being honest ,I appreciate it.
more...
Nickjr
04-28 01:46 PM
I can help you..
send me more details..
outlook2@hotmail.com
send me more details..
outlook2@hotmail.com
hot Export T-DNA to plant cell
annsheila79
04-19 09:53 AM
My collegues recieved in the 3rd month
more...
house Overview of WAVE marker lines
rpatel
07-03 02:47 PM
By copy did you mean a photocopy? or are the originals needed too. I know labor substitution is about to be eliminated but in a hypothetical scenario that the company A retains the original approvals and tries to use it to substitute labor for another candidate with similar skill sets and background ? Will the original benificiary still be still able to use 'copies' of old labor and I140 approvals to retain priority dates with new labor and I140 from company B?
Appreciate your response
You can keep your priority date after your 140 is approved.
However, there is not such thing as transfer of 140 from company A to company B. What would happen is, you would keep a copy of your approved labor and approved 140 at company A. Request them not to revoke it. Even if they revoke 140 and labor, you can still use that priority date in future.
Appreciate your response
You can keep your priority date after your 140 is approved.
However, there is not such thing as transfer of 140 from company A to company B. What would happen is, you would keep a copy of your approved labor and approved 140 at company A. Request them not to revoke it. Even if they revoke 140 and labor, you can still use that priority date in future.
tattoo in plant cells emphasizing
felix31
07-25 08:21 PM
All the fussing about where to file makes my head spin.
Anyways, I shipped my AOS paket visa UPS to Dallas, TX, direct filing is around the corner, and My I-140n was approved in Texas..I did not even consider filing to Nebraska.
I have come to the point that I dont care what happens next...
:rolleyes:..whatever!
Anyways, I shipped my AOS paket visa UPS to Dallas, TX, direct filing is around the corner, and My I-140n was approved in Texas..I did not even consider filing to Nebraska.
I have come to the point that I dont care what happens next...
:rolleyes:..whatever!
more...
pictures to plant cell tissues
stillhopefull
03-28 10:31 AM
Hi - my 485 was tranfered to VSC from TSC last December. Their processing date for 485 is July 2006 :mad:! When TSC is already showing April 2007. Why would they load balance to a SC that is so far behind? Anything I can do to get the case moved back?? Has anybody else been transfered to VSC?
dresses exists in plant cells and
green_card
10-03 04:09 PM
a) you have brass balls. huge ones at that
b) the song "living on the edge" should be your constant theme song and should play as you walk around jangling those big brass orbs. :D
Hats off. i would never have the guts to pull off an international travelling coup like you did, especially post 9/11, especially after the attorney had asked you not to, with an expired H1 AND at the risk of losing the 485....
maybe the song "The Gambler" should play as you walk away and the credits roll...."know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em....know when to walk away....know when to run...."
Maan gaye guru. you are my new hero
scaredy cat that i am, i waited 7 years to visit India, and that was just to avoid F1 to H1 and visa stamping (of course this was right after 9/11)
..........because they didn't like the idea of my travelling after filing 485 as my H1 had expired- they were worried the 485 would be considered abandoned if I travelled without parole. I sort of told them I wont so its very awkward now to call up & tell them ' hey guess what-I ignored your advise and travelled and I'm back with my new visa stamp but its too clean for you to see?!'.
b) the song "living on the edge" should be your constant theme song and should play as you walk around jangling those big brass orbs. :D
Hats off. i would never have the guts to pull off an international travelling coup like you did, especially post 9/11, especially after the attorney had asked you not to, with an expired H1 AND at the risk of losing the 485....
maybe the song "The Gambler" should play as you walk away and the credits roll...."know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em....know when to walk away....know when to run...."
Maan gaye guru. you are my new hero
scaredy cat that i am, i waited 7 years to visit India, and that was just to avoid F1 to H1 and visa stamping (of course this was right after 9/11)
..........because they didn't like the idea of my travelling after filing 485 as my H1 had expired- they were worried the 485 would be considered abandoned if I travelled without parole. I sort of told them I wont so its very awkward now to call up & tell them ' hey guess what-I ignored your advise and travelled and I'm back with my new visa stamp but its too clean for you to see?!'.
more...
makeup mitosis in a plant cell.
jsb
03-17 08:12 AM
There are 2 received dates with your I-485 application. In the receipt, you will have a received date and if you see the USCIS site with your receipt number, there will be a description stating "We received your I-485..... with another date. Which date we have to consider to check the processing date? for my case I have 2 dates: Aug 8, 2008 and Sep 17, 2008.:confused:
CIS systems are not designed for handling PD's properly, as the PD issue comes only for a small percentage of total (family, employment, etc.) applications. Therefore, general information you get is simply to give you an idea that they have touched a case "received" on date published, which may have been cleared, or may not have been cleared due to various reasons, one of which could be "PD is not current". Thus, if case is not cleared due to PD not being current, published dates don't mean much.
Further, although there have been contradictory views on this, it has been confirmed by what USCIS Customer Service tells, that "received date" as interpreted by them, is the date the case was actually entered in the system, which you see online as "we received your case on...", no matter what is written on your receipt.
Note that physical files they need to work on, are sorted in sequence of their physical receipt (and data entry). PD's are buried somewhere in those files, and there is no easy way to sort files by PD. It is not a good system for retrogressed countries, but that seems to be what it is.
CIS systems are not designed for handling PD's properly, as the PD issue comes only for a small percentage of total (family, employment, etc.) applications. Therefore, general information you get is simply to give you an idea that they have touched a case "received" on date published, which may have been cleared, or may not have been cleared due to various reasons, one of which could be "PD is not current". Thus, if case is not cleared due to PD not being current, published dates don't mean much.
Further, although there have been contradictory views on this, it has been confirmed by what USCIS Customer Service tells, that "received date" as interpreted by them, is the date the case was actually entered in the system, which you see online as "we received your case on...", no matter what is written on your receipt.
Note that physical files they need to work on, are sorted in sequence of their physical receipt (and data entry). PD's are buried somewhere in those files, and there is no easy way to sort files by PD. It is not a good system for retrogressed countries, but that seems to be what it is.
girlfriend inside plant cell)
Eberth
09-28 06:09 PM
i dont know, buttons, graphics, interfaces etc...
hairstyles Overview of plant fluid
nousername
03-25 09:27 PM
I was in somewhat similar situation a while back.. Due to my own fault my I-94 was getting expired (before my actual visa) and I was on my 5th yr. Instead of re capturing the H1 time from vacation, etc my lawyer filed my labor under premium process and got I-140 approved in 10 days. Based on that approved I-140 she applied for my H1 extension.
Anyway, going back to your point, I would discuss these points i.e. PP for H1 followed by PP for labor upfront with the future employer, as you can not afford to waist any time.
My only concern is that while filing for I-140 PP is easy but the actual preparation of documents, etc takes time. This includes news paper ad, interview, etc.. This can easily take 3 to 4 months. But on the bright side your employer might already have done this for the existing job opening.
Good luck.
Thank you very much for the response. Yes, I have talked to an employer today...they seem to be willing. Ill have an interview on friday.
How do i convince the lawyers---in case i get hired---that I need the H1B transfer in PP and that the I-140 should be expidited too...Can you please give me a link or a website that indicates that its possible to:
1. Expedite I-140 ( and why I dont have much time)
2. That I can extend beyond 6 years if I-140 is approved.
The reason is that, i know of a person that process these visas and she seemed to not know that you can extend beyond 6 years if I-140 is approved. She sited an example about how a client had to go home because the GC isnt approved.
I am so thankful to the contributors of IV..i learned a lot here! You guys know more that some lawyers I know!---of course...im not saying I dont need lawyers--because I do. But it pays to be informed!!
God bless you all!!!
Anyway, going back to your point, I would discuss these points i.e. PP for H1 followed by PP for labor upfront with the future employer, as you can not afford to waist any time.
My only concern is that while filing for I-140 PP is easy but the actual preparation of documents, etc takes time. This includes news paper ad, interview, etc.. This can easily take 3 to 4 months. But on the bright side your employer might already have done this for the existing job opening.
Good luck.
Thank you very much for the response. Yes, I have talked to an employer today...they seem to be willing. Ill have an interview on friday.
How do i convince the lawyers---in case i get hired---that I need the H1B transfer in PP and that the I-140 should be expidited too...Can you please give me a link or a website that indicates that its possible to:
1. Expedite I-140 ( and why I dont have much time)
2. That I can extend beyond 6 years if I-140 is approved.
The reason is that, i know of a person that process these visas and she seemed to not know that you can extend beyond 6 years if I-140 is approved. She sited an example about how a client had to go home because the GC isnt approved.
I am so thankful to the contributors of IV..i learned a lot here! You guys know more that some lawyers I know!---of course...im not saying I dont need lawyers--because I do. But it pays to be informed!!
God bless you all!!!
bobzibub
06-02 02:06 PM
1st, when fertility rates drop below 2.1 children per woman, population doesn't stabilize, it drops. European populations are dropping for this reason, not stabilizing as he claims. When one generation retires, a diminished population causes damage because retirement benefits like social security is based upon one generation paying for the retirement of the next. European countries are in serious trouble because the generation that could pay for the baby boomers is much smaller. But baby boomers have the votes to force their retirement benefits. The loser is future generations who will foot the bill.
2nd, he uses a graph to look at population clearly showing diminished margins. But he assumes that immigration will only grow linearly, which is clearly false. Unlike his claims, it is clearly "conjecture" and it is clearly "subjective". In fact, it sounds like a pump-and-dump stock scheme to me.
3rd, if the growth of the population doubles, that does not mean that the expenditure on infrastructure doubles as he implies. Most of the expenditure is maintenance on existing infrastructure. (He must know that, he is attempting to scare the beJesus out of people.)
4th he assumes that immigration is purely from the third world. I'm sorry, but I did not escape poverty coming to the US from Canada. If anything, I believe that the US is not addressing long term infrastructure and health issues that will make Canada relatively wealthier in the long run. (see 5)
5th is assumes that immigration is what causes wages to drop. How about the abolishment of unions, the US health care fiasco that bankrupts and destabilizes families, the increase in the costs of education? How about funding schools in poor neighborhoods?
Surely the 5 in 1000 immigrants (the ones that don't vote) are not the ones responsible for lowering of wages for less educated Americans. The longer they blame immigrants the longer the problems will not be fixed. So he is doing a disservice to the American poor. One good thing about cutting off all immigration to the US would be to see these guys look around at all the troubles that they still see, and remove the possibility of blame for their own problems.
6th, I've never heard of an American claim that immigration is a solution to third world poverty. That is a red herring. There are policies that could work, such as lessening farm subsidies, lowering trade barriers, prevention of war, fewer privatization of poor country's infrastructure for the benefit of western firms, etc.
7th, if national parks are being loved to death, perhaps they should make more national parks? There are not that many here, and many are being mined and forested.
2nd, he uses a graph to look at population clearly showing diminished margins. But he assumes that immigration will only grow linearly, which is clearly false. Unlike his claims, it is clearly "conjecture" and it is clearly "subjective". In fact, it sounds like a pump-and-dump stock scheme to me.
3rd, if the growth of the population doubles, that does not mean that the expenditure on infrastructure doubles as he implies. Most of the expenditure is maintenance on existing infrastructure. (He must know that, he is attempting to scare the beJesus out of people.)
4th he assumes that immigration is purely from the third world. I'm sorry, but I did not escape poverty coming to the US from Canada. If anything, I believe that the US is not addressing long term infrastructure and health issues that will make Canada relatively wealthier in the long run. (see 5)
5th is assumes that immigration is what causes wages to drop. How about the abolishment of unions, the US health care fiasco that bankrupts and destabilizes families, the increase in the costs of education? How about funding schools in poor neighborhoods?
Surely the 5 in 1000 immigrants (the ones that don't vote) are not the ones responsible for lowering of wages for less educated Americans. The longer they blame immigrants the longer the problems will not be fixed. So he is doing a disservice to the American poor. One good thing about cutting off all immigration to the US would be to see these guys look around at all the troubles that they still see, and remove the possibility of blame for their own problems.
6th, I've never heard of an American claim that immigration is a solution to third world poverty. That is a red herring. There are policies that could work, such as lessening farm subsidies, lowering trade barriers, prevention of war, fewer privatization of poor country's infrastructure for the benefit of western firms, etc.
7th, if national parks are being loved to death, perhaps they should make more national parks? There are not that many here, and many are being mined and forested.
caviteman
12-02 02:19 PM
Reply from Senator Boxer
========================
Dear Mr. XXXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act. I appreciate hearing from you, and I share your support for this landmark legislation.
As you may know, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid attempted to offer the DREAM Act as an amendment to the Department of Defense (DOD) Authorization bill for Fiscal Year 2011. Unfortunately the Senate minority blocked this legislation from even coming to the floor for debate.
Though I am deeply disappointed by this temporary setback, I will keep working to enact the DREAM Act this year. I am proud to be a co-sponsor of S.729, the Senate version of the DREAM Act. This bill would allow an individual to qualify for legal status if he or she has lived in the United States for at least five years, graduated from high school, completed two years of college or two years of service in the U.S. armed forces, and demonstrated strong moral character.
Each year, thousands of immigrant students with good grades are denied college admission because of their immigration status. Most of these young people had no choice in the matter, having come to the United States with their parents at an early age and spent a significant portion of their lives living in America. The DREAM Act would give these students a real shot at the American dream by providing them with a pathway to legalize their immigration status.
Again, thank you for writing to me about the DREAM Act. You can count on me to keep working to enact this vital legislation. Please feel free to contact me in the future about this or any other issue of concern to you.
Barbara Boxer
United States Senator
========================
Dear Mr. XXXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act. I appreciate hearing from you, and I share your support for this landmark legislation.
As you may know, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid attempted to offer the DREAM Act as an amendment to the Department of Defense (DOD) Authorization bill for Fiscal Year 2011. Unfortunately the Senate minority blocked this legislation from even coming to the floor for debate.
Though I am deeply disappointed by this temporary setback, I will keep working to enact the DREAM Act this year. I am proud to be a co-sponsor of S.729, the Senate version of the DREAM Act. This bill would allow an individual to qualify for legal status if he or she has lived in the United States for at least five years, graduated from high school, completed two years of college or two years of service in the U.S. armed forces, and demonstrated strong moral character.
Each year, thousands of immigrant students with good grades are denied college admission because of their immigration status. Most of these young people had no choice in the matter, having come to the United States with their parents at an early age and spent a significant portion of their lives living in America. The DREAM Act would give these students a real shot at the American dream by providing them with a pathway to legalize their immigration status.
Again, thank you for writing to me about the DREAM Act. You can count on me to keep working to enact this vital legislation. Please feel free to contact me in the future about this or any other issue of concern to you.
Barbara Boxer
United States Senator
No comments:
Post a Comment