nixstor
08-04 12:33 PM
August 03 2007 USCIS Receipt date update from Nebraska has Typo. It has menioned 07/112007 instead of 07/11/2007 or something.
If anyof us submit an application with minor error like wrong check amount USCIS rejects the application instead of giving RFE, however, when USCIS issues updates with Typo it covers itself with the another update or doesn't bother?
I think, appilcants are at the descretion at the hand of USCIS?
Novice,
You are really being a greenhorn here [un]intentionally. Please focus your efforts towards DC rally. Start updating your profile and come out of the anonymous crowd.
Thanks
If anyof us submit an application with minor error like wrong check amount USCIS rejects the application instead of giving RFE, however, when USCIS issues updates with Typo it covers itself with the another update or doesn't bother?
I think, appilcants are at the descretion at the hand of USCIS?
Novice,
You are really being a greenhorn here [un]intentionally. Please focus your efforts towards DC rally. Start updating your profile and come out of the anonymous crowd.
Thanks
wallpaper portal 2 logo wallpaper.
askreddy
01-09 03:05 AM
For Feb 2009:
EB2 India will move to 10/01/2003.
May be true.Last week my EAD is approved for only one year.
My PD is Sep 2003 ( EB3)
EB2 India will move to 10/01/2003.
May be true.Last week my EAD is approved for only one year.
My PD is Sep 2003 ( EB3)
Clown Staples
05-07 06:22 PM
well that was fun..
2011 wallpaper Download Portal 2
augustus
07-20 01:40 PM
Can some tell me what to expect after filing I-485, AP and EAD.
What are the steps after this one?
Someone was saying FP , Namecheck, background check, what are these things? Receipt Date , so many rules etc. We can start this thread so it will be useful for everyone.
What are the steps after this one?
Someone was saying FP , Namecheck, background check, what are these things? Receipt Date , so many rules etc. We can start this thread so it will be useful for everyone.
more...
raysaikat
01-18 12:19 PM
thanks for the responses.
the thing is the company does not lay off - they will fire people to avoid severance pays and all. i would hate to be fired. so to keep my dignity, i want to resign before being fired. so i was wondering if i need to wait for the 6 months to complete or is it ok for me to resign early and move on. not too sure - can some one advise.
thanks
There is no "rule" or "law" that states that one needs to stay with their employer for 6 months after receiving green card. The essential point is that you had the intent of working with your employer when you got the green card. The problem is how you prove your intentions and/or how USCIS can determine what your intentions were. There is a legal precedence that has established the 30/60/90 days rule; if you change your mind before 30 days, then you had different intentions all the time; if you do that after 90 days, then no one will come after you. However, apparently the ruling is binding for DOS, not necessarily USCIS.
My general suggestion is that keep as much record as you can of the "hostile" environment in your office. If you do resign soon, then after 5 years during citizenship application if someone questions that, you should be able to *prove* that at the time of getting the GC you had intention to work for the employer, but it is the employer that made the environment hostile and counter-productive to your career that forced you to leave.
the thing is the company does not lay off - they will fire people to avoid severance pays and all. i would hate to be fired. so to keep my dignity, i want to resign before being fired. so i was wondering if i need to wait for the 6 months to complete or is it ok for me to resign early and move on. not too sure - can some one advise.
thanks
There is no "rule" or "law" that states that one needs to stay with their employer for 6 months after receiving green card. The essential point is that you had the intent of working with your employer when you got the green card. The problem is how you prove your intentions and/or how USCIS can determine what your intentions were. There is a legal precedence that has established the 30/60/90 days rule; if you change your mind before 30 days, then you had different intentions all the time; if you do that after 90 days, then no one will come after you. However, apparently the ruling is binding for DOS, not necessarily USCIS.
My general suggestion is that keep as much record as you can of the "hostile" environment in your office. If you do resign soon, then after 5 years during citizenship application if someone questions that, you should be able to *prove* that at the time of getting the GC you had intention to work for the employer, but it is the employer that made the environment hostile and counter-productive to your career that forced you to leave.
shsk
07-16 01:34 AM
Friday came and went past, Saturday passed off silently, Sunday still thinking what will happen tomorrow.
Let us hope Monday will be a good news for all Legal immigrants and our problems of PD fiasco will be solved.
Temporary or Permanent hope it will be good news to everyone :-)
Let us hope Monday will be a good news for all Legal immigrants and our problems of PD fiasco will be solved.
Temporary or Permanent hope it will be good news to everyone :-)
more...
ras
03-02 09:04 PM
It's more than 65 days now and am still waiting for the AP.
2010 Download Portal 2 Theme
GCBy3000
06-18 01:56 PM
If two prospective employers file for GC, then how this is handled. I beleive you could have two 485 in paralle. Just my thought.
more...
vandanaverdia
09-08 03:02 PM
I have been posting on orkut too & scrapping people. Looks like most of the people are not INTERESTED in participating in something that may ease them of their problems.
I guess they are waiting for OTHERS to do so... I don't care... I will still continue scrapping & keep trying.
At the end of the day, I know I will be satisfied with myself that I at least tried to make a difference to the whole scenario...
I guess they are waiting for OTHERS to do so... I don't care... I will still continue scrapping & keep trying.
At the end of the day, I know I will be satisfied with myself that I at least tried to make a difference to the whole scenario...
hair hd portal 2 background.
akgind
03-05 04:38 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. US has a "Totalization agreement" with a number of West European countries which allows their citizens to move their SS amount into their local PF-type account. I understand they have to give some declaration that they will not come back to the US for [U]work[U].
Thanks:cool:
Details of the Totalization Agreements are on the SSA web site:
http://www.ssa.gov/international/agreements_overview.html
These agreements do not provide for transfer of any SS amount to another country. They merely allow an individual to qualify for SS benefits in US based on 10 years of contributions in the two countries combined, and proportionate payment of monthly SS benefits by US in such cases. Also, they avoid dual contributions in case a working individual is covered by both countries' SS taxes.
1. US has a "Totalization agreement" with a number of West European countries which allows their citizens to move their SS amount into their local PF-type account. I understand they have to give some declaration that they will not come back to the US for [U]work[U].
Thanks:cool:
Details of the Totalization Agreements are on the SSA web site:
http://www.ssa.gov/international/agreements_overview.html
These agreements do not provide for transfer of any SS amount to another country. They merely allow an individual to qualify for SS benefits in US based on 10 years of contributions in the two countries combined, and proportionate payment of monthly SS benefits by US in such cases. Also, they avoid dual contributions in case a working individual is covered by both countries' SS taxes.
more...
snathan
06-19 03:58 PM
Your manager and HR looks like unprofessional people. I don't know the complete situation you were in, but usually managers try not to behave like this because they don't want other existing employees to know that they behave like this when someone resigns.
Sometimes its like working with a pig. When you regret you fought with a pig, its enjoying it.
Sometimes its like working with a pig. When you regret you fought with a pig, its enjoying it.
hot portal 2 logo wallpaper.
oomshiva
07-12 09:51 AM
Dal mein kuch kala hai
this is really getting more confusing and I think
Dal mein kuch kala hai ( something is verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry fishy going on behind how to solve this )
this is really getting more confusing and I think
Dal mein kuch kala hai ( something is verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry fishy going on behind how to solve this )
more...
house Portal 2 Wallpaper
notacrime
11-17 12:22 PM
I assume that the sticky post at the top of this very forum titled 'FBI Name Check Victims - Sign Up Here' indicates that there is a community of people stuck in name check on this forum.
It appears you take issue with the fact that my I-485 application is through marriage to a US citizen. But my situation is exactly the same as others stuck in FBI name check hell.
I have read through the threads linked to by others here, thanks everyone for helping out. But I still don't have a good answer to my question. What is the efficacy of writing your congressperson / senator? Based on responses and on other research so far it appears to be of no help for an individual case.
Anyone have stories of success?
I'm considering filing a writ of mandamus, as this whole thing is ridiculous. I am also committed to helping legislators understand the pain that this causes those of us in this situation. The link to American Families United was very much appreciated on this front - I'm going to head over there and sign up. I'm still going to check back here every couple of days too, as there are a lot of you who are very deeply immersed in this and you have a lot of valuable knowledge to share. I appreciate your time helping me.
All the best!
It appears you take issue with the fact that my I-485 application is through marriage to a US citizen. But my situation is exactly the same as others stuck in FBI name check hell.
I have read through the threads linked to by others here, thanks everyone for helping out. But I still don't have a good answer to my question. What is the efficacy of writing your congressperson / senator? Based on responses and on other research so far it appears to be of no help for an individual case.
Anyone have stories of success?
I'm considering filing a writ of mandamus, as this whole thing is ridiculous. I am also committed to helping legislators understand the pain that this causes those of us in this situation. The link to American Families United was very much appreciated on this front - I'm going to head over there and sign up. I'm still going to check back here every couple of days too, as there are a lot of you who are very deeply immersed in this and you have a lot of valuable knowledge to share. I appreciate your time helping me.
All the best!
tattoo portal 2 logo wallpaper.
chanduv23
02-19 01:09 PM
Based on your user id - you have to answer these kind of questions and not ask these kind of questions
more...
pictures portal 2 logo wallpaper.
logiclife
12-03 08:49 PM
Anything related to information security also goes through lengthy security background checks at consulates when you do visa revalidation, because of it being on TAL.
Just because you do "information security" does not mean that you cannot find a job in the regular sector. Lots of companies need some form of security in their software/applications.
Why don't you relax a bit and then scout outside the government sector? They do not have US citizenship requirements. Maybe it may be worthwhile to change your job profile to be an "information systems engineer/professional" and bank on ur software skills (java,c++,c, oracle etc).
He is right.
One of the main reasons why H1B workers are so competitive is that they are willing and capable to quickly learn new programming/technical skills and are willing to relocate ANYWHERE in the country within a matter of days.
Also, the job market has improved tremendously in last 2 years and you should not find any problem in getting another job that may have a different technology/skill required. You dont have to stick to the same job description when transferring from one H1 to another. That is only neccesary when you are thru your GC process.
Just because you do "information security" does not mean that you cannot find a job in the regular sector. Lots of companies need some form of security in their software/applications.
Why don't you relax a bit and then scout outside the government sector? They do not have US citizenship requirements. Maybe it may be worthwhile to change your job profile to be an "information systems engineer/professional" and bank on ur software skills (java,c++,c, oracle etc).
He is right.
One of the main reasons why H1B workers are so competitive is that they are willing and capable to quickly learn new programming/technical skills and are willing to relocate ANYWHERE in the country within a matter of days.
Also, the job market has improved tremendously in last 2 years and you should not find any problem in getting another job that may have a different technology/skill required. You dont have to stick to the same job description when transferring from one H1 to another. That is only neccesary when you are thru your GC process.
dresses portal 2 logo wallpaper.
wellwishergc
02-24 08:37 AM
I will join
more...
makeup portal 2 logo wallpaper.
leo2606
12-22 01:27 PM
Do we need EAD in hand to invoke AC21?
1) Applied I-485 and AP, did not apply for EAD.
2) After 180 days, can you move to a new company without EAD in hand? I mean H1-B transfer and moving I-485 to new company?
1) Applied I-485 and AP, did not apply for EAD.
2) After 180 days, can you move to a new company without EAD in hand? I mean H1-B transfer and moving I-485 to new company?
girlfriend dresses portal 2 logo render.
vinabath
03-20 10:28 PM
never seen RFE like this..... Are you sure?
See thats the reason I did not post the details.
See thats the reason I did not post the details.
hairstyles portal wallpaper android.
dvb123
09-20 05:34 PM
Is it true that there can be only 3000 visas(approx) for EB3-India p.a.
Unfortunately it is true. With husband and wife only 1500 ppl are gettting gc per year. During Clinton ac21 law in 2001 he gave 130,000extra immigrant visa numbers which was exhausted in 2005. Otherwise eb3 would have remained in late 1990's. So there was a fiasco in July 2001 and again another one in July 2007.
Retrogression was an age old issue. It was there and it will be there.
June 2001 Visa Bulletin
http://www.vkblaw.com/archive/2001/june.htm
After the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century was passed all eb categories became current
July 2001 Bulletin
http://www.vkblaw.com/archive/2001/july.htm
This is an excerpt from August 2001 bulletin
As many readers have already noticed, all of the Employment-based IV categories have became "current" while all of the Family-sponsored categories have either retrogressed or become "unavailable".
Note that the Employment-based categories are "current" and are expected to remain "current" in the foreseeable future for the following reasons: 1) the FY-2001 Employment annual limit is at an all time high (approximately 190,000); 2) the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act removed the per-country limit if there were otherwise unused numbers available, and 3) this Act also established a "pool" of (approximately 130,000) unused Employment-based numbers from FY-1999 and FY-2000 that could be used if the annual Employment numerical limit is reached
Unfortunately it is true. With husband and wife only 1500 ppl are gettting gc per year. During Clinton ac21 law in 2001 he gave 130,000extra immigrant visa numbers which was exhausted in 2005. Otherwise eb3 would have remained in late 1990's. So there was a fiasco in July 2001 and again another one in July 2007.
Retrogression was an age old issue. It was there and it will be there.
June 2001 Visa Bulletin
http://www.vkblaw.com/archive/2001/june.htm
After the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century was passed all eb categories became current
July 2001 Bulletin
http://www.vkblaw.com/archive/2001/july.htm
This is an excerpt from August 2001 bulletin
As many readers have already noticed, all of the Employment-based IV categories have became "current" while all of the Family-sponsored categories have either retrogressed or become "unavailable".
Note that the Employment-based categories are "current" and are expected to remain "current" in the foreseeable future for the following reasons: 1) the FY-2001 Employment annual limit is at an all time high (approximately 190,000); 2) the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act removed the per-country limit if there were otherwise unused numbers available, and 3) this Act also established a "pool" of (approximately 130,000) unused Employment-based numbers from FY-1999 and FY-2000 that could be used if the annual Employment numerical limit is reached
REEF�
11-26 04:22 PM
Besides pom, if you voted for pom, raise your hand!
coopheal
12-30 12:43 PM
Bump
No comments:
Post a Comment