fittan
03-17 01:16 PM
My experience is that it is a big mess to change address. Did it last year for both my wife and my I-485. Had confirmation receipts etc. My change is ok but my wife still shows the old address in the system.
We found that out when we receive a letter that our case was transferred to TSC. The letter was initially sent to the old address, got bounced and then got re-delivered to the new address. We then had a infopass and found that it was still the old address.
Bottom line...go ahead and change but you better verify by calling USCIC and Infppass.
We found that out when we receive a letter that our case was transferred to TSC. The letter was initially sent to the old address, got bounced and then got re-delivered to the new address. We then had a infopass and found that it was still the old address.
Bottom line...go ahead and change but you better verify by calling USCIC and Infppass.
wallpaper hair Prince Harry kissing Zara
gsc999
07-21 04:08 PM
Many senior members have been waiting for this post to appear. This happens like clockwork after every successful achievement at IV :)
A troll from an anti-immigration website raises the same point as this thread. Some IVers respond, defending and provide explanation, as one member has already done. The troll dismisses the explanation and then chaos ensues. :rolleyes:
Lets learn from our past experiences. Lets file our I-485 and focus on the two action item on IV website.
Some new members may not understand wht I am saying. Please look at old archives and you will be able to see through this. It happened when CIR was passed in Senate last year and when we got text of STRIVE bill.
Plassey is a new member with no past record that shows his commitment to IV or his donation record. It is disingenuous to request/demand leader succession and financial record. This is the information our opponents want but they themselves never ever share.
It would be great if members don't respond and let this thread rest where it belongs.
A troll from an anti-immigration website raises the same point as this thread. Some IVers respond, defending and provide explanation, as one member has already done. The troll dismisses the explanation and then chaos ensues. :rolleyes:
Lets learn from our past experiences. Lets file our I-485 and focus on the two action item on IV website.
Some new members may not understand wht I am saying. Please look at old archives and you will be able to see through this. It happened when CIR was passed in Senate last year and when we got text of STRIVE bill.
Plassey is a new member with no past record that shows his commitment to IV or his donation record. It is disingenuous to request/demand leader succession and financial record. This is the information our opponents want but they themselves never ever share.
It would be great if members don't respond and let this thread rest where it belongs.
godbless
02-13 04:19 PM
I don't understand what r they upto and what r we upto. Our parents are not given the visitor visas, we are being charged fee to renew APs and EADs every year which is going to be increased manifold now, our spouses can't work, we find it difficult to travel when the AOS application is under process, we are made to contribute to the social security fund without even knowing if we will ever get that amount back, we are paying heavy taxes and in the end we are hoping for the CIR which is not in sight yet and which mostly talks about Illegals. Shame on them......
2011 Prince Harry, Shirtless
waitnwatch
02-06 04:13 PM
Thanks again. Just spoke to my company lawyer about this issue. He says in case the POE immigration officer does not give I-94 based on the extension there are two options. (1) go to CBP and fix it there like before (2) He will file for the extension of status. I was worried if there will be enough time to do this before she goes out of status and he assured me there won't be any problem even if we file on the last day i.e. 15th. Any advise on this?
Here's what I think and I am not a lawyer.
Your lawyer is correct. As long as your application is pending your spouse is not out of status. The approval once it arrives is retroactive so she will not be out of status. On the other hand a denial of extension of status also will apply retroactively with its own implications.
Here's what I think and I am not a lawyer.
Your lawyer is correct. As long as your application is pending your spouse is not out of status. The approval once it arrives is retroactive so she will not be out of status. On the other hand a denial of extension of status also will apply retroactively with its own implications.
more...
waiting_4_gc
01-19 11:58 PM
I would like to sign up for bay area.
Redwood City-94063
Redwood City-94063
va_dude
05-11 11:53 AM
Hi.
A colleague of mine recently travelled to india and back via London and used his EAD/AP to get in without any trouble at all.
But he did take a transit visa for London. Apparently they need you to get a transit visa even if you are not exiting the airport. Check the consular websites, etc. to confirm this though.
-va_dude
A colleague of mine recently travelled to india and back via London and used his EAD/AP to get in without any trouble at all.
But he did take a transit visa for London. Apparently they need you to get a transit visa even if you are not exiting the airport. Check the consular websites, etc. to confirm this though.
-va_dude
more...
knowDOL
04-03 04:18 PM
Wellsfargo also depends on lot of foreign workers for their IT needs.
This is the contact info of Wellsfargo Chairman & Ceo
Kovacevich, Dick M. (kovacedm@imc.wellsfargo.com)
kovacedm@imc.wellsfargo.com
(415) 396-4927
420 Montgomery
San Francisco, CA 94104
This is the contact info of Wellsfargo Chairman & Ceo
Kovacevich, Dick M. (kovacedm@imc.wellsfargo.com)
kovacedm@imc.wellsfargo.com
(415) 396-4927
420 Montgomery
San Francisco, CA 94104
2010 prince harry shirtless
aware
01-08 01:57 PM
thanks. that helps. however, I have one more question:
If I Xfer my H1 to B without A's knowledge and after few months want to join back A (because priority date has become current or got a better job etc.) do I need to get my H1 Xferred to A again or my old H1 is still valid?
If I Xfer my H1 to B without A's knowledge and after few months want to join back A (because priority date has become current or got a better job etc.) do I need to get my H1 Xferred to A again or my old H1 is still valid?
more...
whitecollarslave
01-14 05:06 PM
this topic can really harm the current admin fixes campaign, because the administration can claim that the precedence of visa recapture was done legislatively (as in AC21) and the administration can pass the baton to the legislature.
You know how the legislature has helped us in recent times. Right?
I have been told that this was a one time recapture in 2001 timeframe via AC21.
As per lazycis this happens every year - unused family based numbers are added to the employment based numbers. As per janilsal this was a one time legislative fix. Can you both post the source of this information?
Others, please comment if you know more about this. And please, please don't just make blanket statements if you can't back up your claims.
You know how the legislature has helped us in recent times. Right?
I have been told that this was a one time recapture in 2001 timeframe via AC21.
As per lazycis this happens every year - unused family based numbers are added to the employment based numbers. As per janilsal this was a one time legislative fix. Can you both post the source of this information?
Others, please comment if you know more about this. And please, please don't just make blanket statements if you can't back up your claims.
hair prince Harry was just
danila
07-19 11:31 AM
USCIS will make more money with fee increase.
I485 filers with new fee structure
I485+EAD+AP = $1010
Yearly renewal EAD+AP = $0
So you are saying that under the new fee structure EADs and APs will never expire? :) My understanding was that you will have to renew them regardless.
I485 filers with new fee structure
I485+EAD+AP = $1010
Yearly renewal EAD+AP = $0
So you are saying that under the new fee structure EADs and APs will never expire? :) My understanding was that you will have to renew them regardless.
more...
frostrated
05-25 03:56 PM
I do not think it is a racist comment, but at the same time it also shows the dislike of illegal immigrants. In today's world where each of us is working hard just to make two ends meet, and to watch another section of society take advantage of the welfare provisions is hurtful. Even those of us who are patiently standing in line need to be worried. There are no sufficient checks and the system is over-whelmed to stem the inflow of illegal immigrants.
What you might want to state to your colleague is show the fact that the current immigration system is broken and needs to be fixed. Talk about the relatively low legal immigration numbers and the backlogs that arise. Also talk of the fact that the government wants to fix the flow of illegal immigrants, but is not in a position to do anything unless the government can pass the CIR, which includes legalizing those that are in today.
What you might want to state to your colleague is show the fact that the current immigration system is broken and needs to be fixed. Talk about the relatively low legal immigration numbers and the backlogs that arise. Also talk of the fact that the government wants to fix the flow of illegal immigrants, but is not in a position to do anything unless the government can pass the CIR, which includes legalizing those that are in today.
hot house Tags: Prince Harry
MeraNoAayega
04-10 11:42 AM
and this is my 10th year H1B extension that company is asking for. Again we got RFE for H1B extension. We are tired of asking for 1 year extension so by using premium option of I-140 we can get 3 years of extension. Below is the detail of I-140 RFE we got in October 2008.
1. Copy of all four years of XXXXXXXXX transcripts in Bachelor�s Degree in XXXXX Engineering;
2. Copy of company�s Form 1120 U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return for 10/01/2006 to 09/30/2007;
3. Copies of company�s Bank Statements for the year 2008 (January to Current). Please note that we only require pages of the statements showing only the monthly bank balance. We do not need the entire statement package;
4. A copy of XXXXXX W-2 for the year 2007;
5. Copies of Pay-Stubs for XXXXXXXX for the year 2008 (January to Current); and
6. Experience letters (job letters) from previous employer(s): Please note that the Job letters does not have to be original. Scanned copy or Fax copy is acceptable. JOB DUTIES, DATES AND NAMES OF EMPLOYER IN JOB LETTERS SHOULD MATCH WITH JOB RESPONSIBILITIES IN LABOR CERTIFICATION (See attached). The job letter must submitted by your prior employer(s), on the company�s letter-head containing a valid address and telephone number; are dated; singed by a representative such as a supervisor or personnel officer; clearly state the period(s) of employment, position title(s) held by the beneficiary, and duties performed by you during the specified period(s) of employments.
Hope above helps you to understand kind of trouble I am in. Please share your knowledge or experience for me.
file writ of mandamus & sue uscis...:)
I know its easier said that done... but now a days lot of the applicants are resorting to this method to get a quicker adjudication...
1. Copy of all four years of XXXXXXXXX transcripts in Bachelor�s Degree in XXXXX Engineering;
2. Copy of company�s Form 1120 U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return for 10/01/2006 to 09/30/2007;
3. Copies of company�s Bank Statements for the year 2008 (January to Current). Please note that we only require pages of the statements showing only the monthly bank balance. We do not need the entire statement package;
4. A copy of XXXXXX W-2 for the year 2007;
5. Copies of Pay-Stubs for XXXXXXXX for the year 2008 (January to Current); and
6. Experience letters (job letters) from previous employer(s): Please note that the Job letters does not have to be original. Scanned copy or Fax copy is acceptable. JOB DUTIES, DATES AND NAMES OF EMPLOYER IN JOB LETTERS SHOULD MATCH WITH JOB RESPONSIBILITIES IN LABOR CERTIFICATION (See attached). The job letter must submitted by your prior employer(s), on the company�s letter-head containing a valid address and telephone number; are dated; singed by a representative such as a supervisor or personnel officer; clearly state the period(s) of employment, position title(s) held by the beneficiary, and duties performed by you during the specified period(s) of employments.
Hope above helps you to understand kind of trouble I am in. Please share your knowledge or experience for me.
file writ of mandamus & sue uscis...:)
I know its easier said that done... but now a days lot of the applicants are resorting to this method to get a quicker adjudication...
more...
house prince harry shirtless
nviren
02-17 03:32 PM
Updated profile.
I have put labor Certification. I think that means labor applied and waiting for certification. If not, please add explicite category as "Labour pending" or something like that.
Thanks,
Viren
I have put labor Certification. I think that means labor applied and waiting for certification. If not, please add explicite category as "Labour pending" or something like that.
Thanks,
Viren
tattoo prince harry shirtless mauritius
div_bell_2003
12-12 05:34 PM
Interestingly, I saw soft LUDs with todays date on my pending I-485, pending I-131 and approved I-765 and my wifes pending I-131 , not sure what's happening though :confused: ( as always with USCIS ) . My PD is way ahead (or behind, depends on the way you look at it) of the current cut off date ... March 2005.
more...
pictures prince harry shirtless mauritius. {DATA-BING}. {YOUTUBE}. {TWITTER:3}
rb_248
03-20 10:43 AM
How will this affect the GC process ?....let us say one claims his/her parents as dependents and get a RFE to produce Tax Returns. Immigration officer sees parents were claimed as dependents. Now how will this be interpreted ? Favorable/Unfavorable ????
Gurus, answers please.
Anybody ?????
Please post your thoughts. Thanks.
Gurus, answers please.
Anybody ?????
Please post your thoughts. Thanks.
dresses hair more. prince harry
cpbaherwani
12-13 02:40 PM
Why do we need to bother the moderators? Keep crushing and criticising such threads. People will get the message that everyone else is serious about the issues. They will find other places on the web for predictions.
more...
makeup about prince harrymay
optimystic
09-15 11:08 AM
Yeah...it may make sense to go with a lawyer. I was just trying to point out that we dont need to spend for lawyers if we don't have to.
girlfriend prince harry shirtless
vicks_don
10-08 07:47 PM
and some websites like priceline is not returning the full money also.
hairstyles Tags: Prince Harry Shirtless
vasa
07-11 12:02 PM
There was a similiar post earlier on this..
Lets notget carried away .. If you hurt your employers you HURT yourself..They just spent thousands of dollars to aid us in applying for 485, you want to cause them trouble.?whtagood will that do..
We are not illegal immigrants..
Moderators:Please delete this thread
Lets notget carried away .. If you hurt your employers you HURT yourself..They just spent thousands of dollars to aid us in applying for 485, you want to cause them trouble.?whtagood will that do..
We are not illegal immigrants..
Moderators:Please delete this thread
GoneSouth
02-15 09:34 AM
I-485, Section 3, Question 2, is: Have you received public assistance in the United States from any source, including the United States government or any state, county, city or municipality (other than emergency medical treatment), or are you likely to receive public assistance in the future?
This is for the so-called "public charge" test and is applicable to both primary and dependants. Seems like filing for UI while on EAD is a sure fire way to fail the public charge test if it is discovered by USCIS.
This is for the so-called "public charge" test and is applicable to both primary and dependants. Seems like filing for UI while on EAD is a sure fire way to fail the public charge test if it is discovered by USCIS.
ruby
08-17 09:14 AM
is it true that interfiling can only be used if EB2-PD is current?
--------------------------------------------------------------
//NSC Procedure of Transfer of Pending I-1485 From Current Approved Underlying I-140 Petition to New I-140 Petition
� This posting involves aliens who are waiting for the I-485 applications where the underlying I-140 petition was approved but due to retrogression, I-485 cannot be approved. Most of these cases are EB-3 cases. When the same alien obtains an EB-2 labor certification approval through the same employer or a different employer and the visa number is available for the EB-2 for him or her, he should be eligible for filing another I-485 application based on the visa number available EB-2 I-140 petition. This can be achieved either by concurrent I-140/I-485 filing or if the new EB-2 I-140 has already been approved, by filing of stand-alone I-485 application.
� However, in the foregoing situation, the Pearson Memo of 2000 allows the alien to transfer the pending I-485 application from the existing underlying approved I-140 petition to a new EB-2 I-140 petition such that the alien does not have to file another I-485 application to use the second I-140 petition. For this to happen, two conditions must be met: (1) The existing underlying I-140 petition (most likely EB-3) must have been approved before the I-485 transfer is requested. (2) Secondly, the visa number must be "current" for the new I-140 petition (most likely EB-2) before the I-485 transfer is requested. Inasmuch as the visa number is current, the pending I-485 application that suffer from the visa number retrogression can be transferred to the nex I-140 petition.
� According to the Nebraska Service Center, people should take the following procedure to request such transfer of pending I-485 application from one I-140 petition to another I-140 petition:
o Request for Transfer of Pending I-485 Application to a Newly Filed I-140 Petition That Has Visa Number Current: In this situation, he/she is filing a new I-140 petition (probably EB-2 with visa number "current") with the agency to transfer the pending I-485 application and attach it to the new I-140 petition. The NSC states that if he/she files such new I-140 petition, he/she should use "large, bold print in the cover letter or with a separate, brightly colored cover page and notation 'Inter-file I-140 with Pending I-485' and include the Receipt/File Number of Pending I-485 Application, both on the Envelope and Cover Letter.
o Request for Transfer of Pending I-485 Application to Already Approved New I-140 (most likely EB-2 category): NSC asks to print the attached over sheet on brightly colored paper, and submitting it with a cover letter providing the following Information:
Name of 485 applicant
Name of I-140 petitioner (employer)
I-485 Receipt Number
"A" Number of the 485 applicant
Prior I-140 petition (1) Receipt Number, (2) Filing Date, and (3) Approval Date
New I-140 to be inter-filed
Statement requesting new I-140 be inter-filed with the pending I-485 application
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
//NSC Procedure of Transfer of Pending I-1485 From Current Approved Underlying I-140 Petition to New I-140 Petition
� This posting involves aliens who are waiting for the I-485 applications where the underlying I-140 petition was approved but due to retrogression, I-485 cannot be approved. Most of these cases are EB-3 cases. When the same alien obtains an EB-2 labor certification approval through the same employer or a different employer and the visa number is available for the EB-2 for him or her, he should be eligible for filing another I-485 application based on the visa number available EB-2 I-140 petition. This can be achieved either by concurrent I-140/I-485 filing or if the new EB-2 I-140 has already been approved, by filing of stand-alone I-485 application.
� However, in the foregoing situation, the Pearson Memo of 2000 allows the alien to transfer the pending I-485 application from the existing underlying approved I-140 petition to a new EB-2 I-140 petition such that the alien does not have to file another I-485 application to use the second I-140 petition. For this to happen, two conditions must be met: (1) The existing underlying I-140 petition (most likely EB-3) must have been approved before the I-485 transfer is requested. (2) Secondly, the visa number must be "current" for the new I-140 petition (most likely EB-2) before the I-485 transfer is requested. Inasmuch as the visa number is current, the pending I-485 application that suffer from the visa number retrogression can be transferred to the nex I-140 petition.
� According to the Nebraska Service Center, people should take the following procedure to request such transfer of pending I-485 application from one I-140 petition to another I-140 petition:
o Request for Transfer of Pending I-485 Application to a Newly Filed I-140 Petition That Has Visa Number Current: In this situation, he/she is filing a new I-140 petition (probably EB-2 with visa number "current") with the agency to transfer the pending I-485 application and attach it to the new I-140 petition. The NSC states that if he/she files such new I-140 petition, he/she should use "large, bold print in the cover letter or with a separate, brightly colored cover page and notation 'Inter-file I-140 with Pending I-485' and include the Receipt/File Number of Pending I-485 Application, both on the Envelope and Cover Letter.
o Request for Transfer of Pending I-485 Application to Already Approved New I-140 (most likely EB-2 category): NSC asks to print the attached over sheet on brightly colored paper, and submitting it with a cover letter providing the following Information:
Name of 485 applicant
Name of I-140 petitioner (employer)
I-485 Receipt Number
"A" Number of the 485 applicant
Prior I-140 petition (1) Receipt Number, (2) Filing Date, and (3) Approval Date
New I-140 to be inter-filed
Statement requesting new I-140 be inter-filed with the pending I-485 application
--------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment